Attention: Are they not perhaps pushing for an early March attack on Iraq?
Epimenedes | 21.02.2003 09:54
Put these pieces of information together:
"Britain, U.S. plan to present resolution to UN next week"
http://www.canoe.ca/LondonNews/lf.lf-02-21-0016.html
(ie. the talk earlier this week that they would wait until mid-March for a new resolution may not be correct)
with
"Rumsfeld: Military ready to go if Bush gives order"
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/21/sprj.irq.rumsfeld
http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=07D2D7B1-C5E7-490B-9716DFB2185BF5E1
with
"Both the United States and Britain warn their citizens to leave Iraq, Kuwait, and the occupied territories of Israel immediately"
http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=35E77821-89DB-4615-B5697759F5E7D406
They had always preferred the early March deadline, and had thought it was on stream until Blix, and the French/German/Russian opposition, made a mid-February UN agreement impossible.
BUT THE BASTARDS CONTINUED TO WORK TO THEIR ORIGINAL MILITARY TIMETABLE
so people perhaps need to be ready to be very busy in the next couple of weeks.
Epimenedes
Comments
Display the following 2 comments