Chatham House report about the EDL
Paddy Finucane | 08.03.2013 17:51 | Anti-racism | Culture | Workers' Movements
The description states that the report's findings run "contrary to widely held assumptions which trace support for counter-Jihad groups to the financial crisis, economic austerity and political isolation", despite the fact that the far-right in the UK experienced dramatic growth in support years before the present government's current program of austerity. The financial crisis and economic austerity are realities the far-right (unsuccessfully) sought to exploit – they are not conditions which produced the EDL or its many splinter-groups, begging an obvious question about who the report thinks made such assumptions in the first place?
A few gripes like that notwithstanding, report findings seem mostly accurate – confirming for instance that EDL supporters a/ are "more likely than their fellow citizens to have voted", b/ are "not more likely to be unemployed (or) dependent on social housing", c/ are "not necessarily young and uneducated", d/ are "xenophobic and profoundly hostile towards immigration", and e/ are "more likely... to expect inter-communal conflict and (to) believe violence is justifiable and inevitable".
These findings are all compatible with the interpretation that EDL supporters are (despite a smattering of younger hooligans and older religious nutters and middle-class eccentrics) in significant part drawn from the tiny minority of those middle-aged, semi-skilled, often self-employed and non-unionised tradesmen, who are also deeply xenophobic and immersed in a culture of racially-motivated street violence – who have in other words been involved in far-right thuggery (and been voting for far-right parties) for decades. Bearing in mind that MOST self-employed tradesmen wouldn't touch the EDL with a barge-pole, this report suggests the EDL are pretty much the kind of people who observant Anti-Fascists always thought they were.
************************************************
The English Defence League
Cordelia Nelson
7 March 2013
"A new Chatham House report, which draws on YouGov research, challenges stereotypes about the English Defence League and the wider counter-Jihad network. The report by Dr Matthew Goodwin, entitled "The Roots of Extremism: The English Defence League and the Counter-Jihad Challenge", finds that widely held assumptions about counter-Jihad sympathisers may need to be reassessed. Contrary to widely held assumptions which trace support for counter-Jihad groups to the financial crisis, economic austerity and political isolation, our research for the report reveals that most respondents sympathetic of the EDL’s values are:
• Actively engaging in mainstream politics, and more likely than their fellow citizens to have voted at the last election
• Not more likely to be unemployed, dependent on social housing or motivated simply by economic insecurity
• Not necessarily young and uneducated. Less than a fifth (16%) of sympathisers in our sample are aged 18-29 years, and fewer than one in ten supporters has no qualifications whatsoever
• Not simply anti-Muslim and overtly racist, but xenophobic and profoundly hostile towards immigration
• More likely than the British public to expect inter-communal conflict and believe violence is justifiable and inevitable
YouGov’s Political and Social Research Manager Laurence Janta-Lipinski comments "This new research helps to shed light on an under-researched and poorly-understood group in British society. The report helps to answer some of the fundamental questions surrounding these groups and challenges some of the widely-held views on their demographic make-up, core concerns and potential support"."
yougov.co.uk/news/2013/03/07/english-defence-league/
Paddy Finucane