NASA faked Mars landing of 'Curiosity'
Buzz | 07.08.2012 10:49
Fake Landing : Mars Curiosity Rover Is Really Near Area-51 In Nevada
The supposed landing of the Curiosity was CGI and computer sound effects piped into mission control at JPL in order to fool the engineers, the invited guests, the media and the dumbed down public.
The real rover is in Nevada near Area-51 complete with a Hollywood backdrop standing in for the horizon and the colour imaging being re-tuned to a red tint in order to make blue skies look pink and the brown desert soil look deep red.
It's all FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!
The supposed landing of the Curiosity was CGI and computer sound effects piped into mission control at JPL in order to fool the engineers, the invited guests, the media and the dumbed down public.
The real rover is in Nevada near Area-51 complete with a Hollywood backdrop standing in for the horizon and the colour imaging being re-tuned to a red tint in order to make blue skies look pink and the brown desert soil look deep red.
It's all FAKE, FAKE, FAKE!
Whistleblowers connected to both NASA and the JPL have confirmed what a number of us have known for some time. The Americans were simply not capable of achieving the mission so they built a film set and with the help of some clever CGI faked the whole thing.
This of course is from the same people who faked the moon landings, imagine how much better they have got since 1969 ? Back then they made a number of errors:
1) When the astronauts are putting up the American flag it waves. There is no wind on the Moon.
2) No stars are visible in the pictures taken by the Apollo astronauts from the surface of the Moon.
3) No blast crater is visible in the pictures taken of the lunar landing module.
4) The landing module weighs 17 tons and yet sits on top of the sand making no impression. Next to it astronauts’ footprints can be seen in the sand.
5) The footprints in the fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, as if made in wet sand.
6) When the landing module takes off from the Moon’s surface there is no visible flame from the rocket.
7) If you speed up the film of the astronauts walking on the Moon’s surface they look like they were filmed on Earth and slowed down.
8) The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt.
9) The rocks brought back from the Moon are identical to rocks collected by scientific expeditions to Antarctica.
10) All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.
This of course is from the same people who faked the moon landings, imagine how much better they have got since 1969 ? Back then they made a number of errors:
1) When the astronauts are putting up the American flag it waves. There is no wind on the Moon.
2) No stars are visible in the pictures taken by the Apollo astronauts from the surface of the Moon.
3) No blast crater is visible in the pictures taken of the lunar landing module.
4) The landing module weighs 17 tons and yet sits on top of the sand making no impression. Next to it astronauts’ footprints can be seen in the sand.
5) The footprints in the fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, as if made in wet sand.
6) When the landing module takes off from the Moon’s surface there is no visible flame from the rocket.
7) If you speed up the film of the astronauts walking on the Moon’s surface they look like they were filmed on Earth and slowed down.
8) The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt.
9) The rocks brought back from the Moon are identical to rocks collected by scientific expeditions to Antarctica.
10) All six Moon landings happened during the Nixon administration. No other national leader has claimed to have landed astronauts on the Moon, despite 40 years of rapid technological development.
Buzz
