Targeted killings and "surgical interventions", the automation of death
K (Ona Expansiva) | 17.07.2011 23:17 | Analysis | Terror War
As noted by The Guardian on June 30th , the attack in Somalia also represents the expansion of the campaign without drivers to a sixth country , U.S. drones are currently active and and operative in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen and more recently in Libya. Also last week BBC echoed the intentions of the Obama administration to provide drones to their allies in Africa, namely Uganda and Burundi for their use in Somali territory (where both countries contribute about 9,000 troops to the African Union troops contingent deployed in "peace operations"). According to US defense officials., drones would be deployed in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, which control is disputed.
The use of drones as a method of eliminating suspected terrorist threats has increased over the past four years (from 4 instances in 2007 to 53 in 2010), especially in the U.S. campaign on the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan with about 253 episodes reported since 2004, final results (in terms of victims) of such operations are difficult to verify but are estimated to be between 1,500 and 2,500 victims, calling into question basic concepts such as national States sovereignty or the summary execution of perceived suspects redefining the military actions of the second millennium. The UN special rapporteur on summary, extrajudicial or arbitrary executions Philip Alston has been criticized on numerous occasions the concept of targeted killings . Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) such as Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International have also expressed concern and condemnation. A good summary of critical voices is to be found in this article originally appeared in Counterpunch by Doug Noble, member of the Upstate Coalition to Ground the Drones .
K (Ona Expansiva)
e-mail:
onadaexpansiva@gmail.com
Homepage:
http://onadaexpansiva.blogspot.com