Did the CPS unlawfully authorise undercover work?
dangermouse | 18.01.2011 12:40 | Repression | Liverpool | Sheffield
Do the police have the power to authorise officers to commit crime?
The CPS basically do this anyway, when they find some excuse and say it's "not in the public interest" or "insufficient evidence to prosecute" when it comes to the police, but that's somewhat different, because that's after the fact and so harder to challenge.
Apparently the head of the CPS, Keir Starmer, has just told the Justice Committee that "decisions on undercover policing do not involve the CPS"
![](/img/extlink.gif)
I was also interested to read that, according to Bob Quick, who as an assistant commissioner was the former head of special operations at the Metropolitan police, a senior officer can authorise an undercover officer to participate in criminal acts: "If they are not involved in the planning, or did not instigate or initiate an offence, if their role is of a peripheral nature, they can be granted participating status."
![](/img/extlink.gif)
I wasn't aware that there was any law that gave police officers the power to allow other police officers to commit crime, so it would be interesting if someone could find out exactly which statute allows this.
dangermouse
Comments
Display the following 11 comments