"Right, so a job i've been after for several years opened its recruitment window this week (a fortnight every year at best), and the blurb contains this gem:

[#]My prospective employers wrote:
We would particularly welcome applications from communities that are currently under-represented, such as people from a minority ethnic background and women[#].
I am neither of the above, and this has precisely zero impact on my ability to do the job. You can see how the BNP spin this as anti-white male prejudice. Cos it is, regardless of the intentions. Fucksake.
This thread particularly welcomes contributions from platformist fuckwits and male feminists defending this PC shite.

so am i being a bigoted cunt, or is it just that i'm a little pissed off to wait 18 months for a 10-day application window in which the absence of a dark-coloured vagina could consign me to 18 more months of tedious office shit?"

Amazingly the above quote was written, not by a member of the BNP on Stormfront, but a member of Solidarity Federation on a publicly accessible 'libertarian communist' website. The Solidarity Federation (SolFed) is a federation of class struggle anarchists advocating a strategy of anarcho-syndicalism as a method of abolishing capitalism and the state, and has historically had a reputation for being serious opponents of bigoted and reactionary ideas. But ironically the above quote from one of its members doesn't actually contravene Solfed's aims and principles as according to their constitution: "All members have the right to: Free expression of their ideas"

The question is what has turned a once active proponent of working class solidarity (Solfed came out of DAM - leading one of the most active anti-fascist initiatives of its era) and an advocate of collective workplace militancy into a repository for BNP-lite sentiment?

And what does it say about the state of the anarchist movement where members of revolutionary organisations can feel confident enough coming out publicly with this sort of stuff?