A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

George Galloway, MP: Building 7 collapse "practically impossible"

Edited audio from George Galloways friday and saturday radio show in which he makes it quite clear that he disagrees with the official conspiracy theory surrounding the events of 9/11 and asks people to investigate further.

Audio George Galloway show (edited)- 17th April 2009 - mp3 15M

Audio George Galloway show (edited) - 18th April 2009 - mp3 18M

George Galloway

George Galloway MP had a New Yorker called Tom Kiley on his Talksport radio show friday and saturday night talking about 9/11 and with particular focus on the destruction of the Twin Towers and World Trade Centre Building 7. George Galloway opens the first show

http://www.wearechange.org.uk/galloway17april.mp3 explaining that he still holds Islamic extremists responsible but a recent chance meeting with Tom in New York has planted seeds of doubt in his mind. Soon into the second show

http://www.wearechange.org.uk/galloway18april.mp3 George Galloway admits "it's hard to see scientifically why both of the Towers fell down in the way that they did and it's practically impossible for me to see how Building 7 could have fallen down in the way it did"

Some of the professional organisations mentioned include:

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

http://ae911truth.org

Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

http://stj911.com

Little over a week ago 9 members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice had a peer-reviewed paper 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe' published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal. According to one of the scientists involved Professor Steven E Jones "in short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings." It can be read at

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM.

In 2008, several of these authors published three articles challenging the official reports in US scientific journals, The Open Civil Engineering Journal

http://bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM, The Environmentalist

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4, and The Journal of Engineering Mechanics

http://ascelibrary.aip.org/dbt/dbt.jsp?KEY=JENMDT&Volume=134&Issue=10#DISCUSSIONS%20AND%20CLOSURES. Dozens of other papers making similar challenges have been published in the sister publication of the Scholars group, The Journal of 9/11 Studies

http://journalof911studies.com

DISCLAIMER: We Are Change London do not endorse all of Tom Kiley's positions.

G
e-mail: info@wearechange.org.uk
Homepage: http://www.wearechange.org.uk

Comments

Display the following 24 comments

Yes of course. — Its true!!!!!!!
Yep, we are! — Bankrupt Nation.
Accompanying articles — Scientific Method
A Tough Choice... — Me
9/11: The Facts Speak for Themselves — Scientific Method
Why Tower 7 would have fallen the way it did. — Onlyme
@ onlyme — Scientific Method
@ Scientific Method — Onlyme
Which experts? — Which experts?
Re. yep we are! — Its true!!!!!!!
@ Its true!!!!!!! — 9/11 Truth Activist
when in doubt bring out the lizards — A
Path of least resistance — MonkeyBot 5000
New guidlines? — Why oh why?
Food for thought — clueless idiot
Nick Griffin? When in doubt bring out the nazis — reductio ad nazium
911 atrocity was 21st Century televisual scam — FITwatcher general
@ FITwatcher general — 9/11 Truth Activist
Project Censored on 9-11 — 2%Human
Think it through — Stroppyoldgit
You need to look at all the evidence before theorising — 2%Human
dear activist — FITwatcher general
Conspiracy vs. Coincidence — California Dreaming
A picture is worth years of waffle? — Thermate

UK Indymedia

George Galloway, MP: Building 7 collapse "practically impossible"

Comments

Global IMC Network