Hidden Article
This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.
IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All
postings to the open publishing
newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK.
Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the
newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the
contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or
services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an
endorsement nor a recommendation.
no to climate lies |
18.07.2007 16:35
| Climate Chaos
There\'s a great little article by Dr David Evans, who used to work for the Australian Greenhouse Office. He was, as he admits, doing a well-paid scientific job modelling the effects of man-made CO2. It\'s the sort of thing that Kyoto, and other future schemes, would depend on implicitly. However, as Evans explains, once he had a chance to look at the science he\'s had a change of heart. Where is the observational evidence, he asks? After 20 years (and billions of dollars) of intense investigation why is the evidence so scant?
Read his article, as true confessions go it, it\'s a good one.
http://ncwatch.typepad.com/media/files/D-Evans2007.pdf
There\'s a great little article by Dr David Evans, who used to work for the Australian Greenhouse Office. He was, as he admits, doing a well-paid scientific job modelling the effects of man-made CO2. It\'s the sort of thing that Kyoto, and other future schemes, would depend on implicitly. However, as Evans explains, once he had a chance to look at the science he\'s had a change of heart. Where is the observational evidence, he asks? After 20 years (and billions of dollars) of intense investigation why is the evidence so scant?
Read his article, as true confessions go it, it\'s a good one.
http://ncwatch.typepad.com/media/files/D-Evans2007.pdf