1.We are Allan and Julie Knight, we have been in a legal battle since 1999 to date- we are litigants in person. This case is about non payment of our work invoices for vodaphone plc (their agent). This was a simple commercial case.

2.The information released in this article is a brief account of some of the injustice we have suffered to date.

3.This is an attempt to ‘break free’ from the injustice we suffer and make the courts honour their judgements, which are totally in our favour and have been for eight years!

Please help us publicise these facts worldwide.


Some of the Crimes of Nicholas Sarkozy (President Elect) France:

4.In the European Court in Brussels a criminal trial took place in April/ May 2007 in front of a panel of 15 judges.

5.The accused; Vodaphone plc/ British Government/ British Judiciary/ The Bank of England/ Nicholas Sarkozy/ Other French Government Officials.

6. Lord Justice Clarke (Head of the Court of Appeal in England) who appeared as a witness and co-accused in the trial gave vital evidence against other co-accused, his testimony lasted 4 days! This is just a small amount of the information relayed to the court.

7.The evidence he gave against Nicholas Sarkozy is as follows;
I.Nicholas Sarkoy is not his real name. His family were Hungarian refugees post world war 2. They stole the name of an aristocratic Hungarian family in order to elevate their own status.
II.Vodaphone plc. have heavily funded Sarkozy’s presidential election campaign (we know this is totally illegal to accept foreign company funding for such purposes in France.)
III.Lord Justice Clarke also revealed that Nicholas Sarkozy has been heavily involved in ‘Perverting the Course of Justice’ in our legal case since 2005 (our legal action has been ongoing since 1999, against vodaphone plc. and their agent and eventually the British Government).

Crime and Punishment carried out by Nicholas Sarkozy

Lord Justice Clarke’s testimony clarified the involvement of a Jaques Verjais;
IV.Verjais was ‘brought in’ to cause chaos in our Strasbourg (Court of Human Rights) and French Criminal Proceedings. He was an advocate for the British Government and Vodaphone plc.
V.L J Clarke’s testimony revealed that Jaques Verjais was in fact blackmailed by Nichlas Sarkozy to create total havoc and finally ‘events’ forced* Verjais to reveal his supporters inside the Presidential Office.

*note: This was connected to the illegal dismissal of a prosecuting Judge in an earlier criminal trial conducted in Paris France. The case was brought against the following parties;
The directors of Vodaphone plc.
Their Lawyers in various countries
Their Vodaphone agent
His Lawyers in the UK
Certain other Lawyers working in France including Jaques Verjais
Certain assistants of the Lawyers
Certain officials of the British State

The accused are charged/ found guilty of the following crimes- contrary to the provision of the criminal code (French Law):
Fraud;
Deception;
Theft;
Conspiracy to undertake the above

All the accused mentioned above are held in cells contained in the criminal courts in Paris since the 20th December 2006. Except Jaques Verjais.
Once Verjais had revealed his connections in the presidential office he was tried by a court in Lyons France on the 1st February 2007 and sentenced to 15 years in prison- he has been sent to Martinique (French Colony).
This all happened because Nicholas Sarkozy was doing a ‘cleaning up’ process to pave his way to the Presidency of France.

Now we return to the trial in Brussels

8.The criminal trial in Brussels came to an end on Friday the 4th May 2007, totally in our favour, with a 2/3rd majority of the panel of judges sitting. The accused have all been found guilty and will be sentenced at a later date. Some having prison sentences and others with suspended sentences or just fines.

9.The European Court in Brussels judgement is presently being filed and circulated to all European Courts. Publication of this will be on Monday 14th may 2007.

10.Due to the Presidential Election in France the above statements from L J Clarke (7-I to 7-VI) have been blocked by the Brussels Court from being made public knowledge by delaying their final judgement.

11.Blocking the above information has denied the French electorate a fair and legal election.

12.We understand that the other French candidates knew about L J Clarkes testimony but failed to inform the French electorate.

13.Further L J Clarkes testimony has caused Nicholas Sarkozy’s wife to leave him.

14.Since the Brussels judgement has been ‘sealed’ and is circulating, we, through our Barrister (English) and advocate (French) have been attempting to get access to our awarded moneys (this money has been awarded to our selves by the Strasbourg Court for abuse of our Human Rights by the British Government). Even though we have been awarded monies from our court action we have not received one penny of it.

15.The process to withdraw our money was correctly activated by our barrister through a branch of the European Clearing Bank in Brussels- on our instruction. On Wednesday the 9th May 2007.

16.Also on Wednesday 9th May 2007 Sarkozy phoned our barrister and threatened him/us with the French secret police and said we would never be paid.

17.On Thursday 10th May 2007 our barrister attended the bank- only to be told he could not collect any money for us as he was ‘not authorised’ to do so. This was contradictory to Wednesdays 9th Mays agreement with the bank. This was the opening to the latest efforts to pervert the course of justice in our case that Nicholas Sarkozy had set up with the Belgium Police/ Government and courts! This 'scam' was authorised at the highest level to protect the lies which had been exposed throughout the course of our criminal trial in Brussels.

18.Once our barrister had left the bank, he called us to inform us of (a) the refusal to supply him with our money, (b) he was asking our French advocate to travel to Brussels to sort this out which he agreed to do.

19.Once the call was concluded to us, he was arrested by armed Belgium Police under the allegation of attempting to steal our money. The allegation was made by the bank he had just attended.

20.Our barrister was detained in police cells, without access to a solicitor, strip searched looking for the supposedly stolen money which the bank had refused to give him!

21.Our barrister was bailed eventually by our French advocate once he had found where he was (in a police cell).

22.A hearing was set for Friday 11th May 2007 in the Brussels in European Court where the Criminal Trial took place (in item 4 of this article).

23.This hearing was mysteriously switched to a lower local Belgium Court again under Nicholas Sarkozy’s influence.

Hearing in Belgium Court – Friday 11th May 2007

24.In front of a jury our barrister was defended by our French advocate.

25. The prosecuting side included the Bank Officials (whom agreed to give our monies legally to our barrister - then being part of the 'scam', refused), the Belgium police and a member of the Belgium Government.

26.Our French advocate pointed out to the Court. (a) the prosecuting team, bank/ police / government official were in fact the criminals involved in this scam. (b) That we should immediately be brought as witnesses for our barrister to prove his innocence. (c) The judge refused both (a) and (b) – no reason given. (d) After our barrister gave evidence in the witness box the judge ‘threw the case out’- stated “this is the most ridiculous case he had ever been involved in”. (e) The judge discharged our barrister as there was no evidence against him.

27.We ask the French people and Belgium people to demand this information be made public and stop Nicholas Sarkozy from becoming French President. He is a fake and a criminal.

One race, one nation, one love, one truth.