Glasgow: M74 Court Case Ends
CH | 28.06.2006 16:23 | Ecology
According to their final diary entry (see link below), the judge spent the morning re-characterising the findings of the Inquiry as matters of "policy discretion" rather than Fact.
Details aren't given but that would seem to include such matters as:
- increased "community severance"
- increased CO2 emissions, contrary to their stated policy objectives.
- increased traffic, contrary to wanting to reduce them.
The end of the legal action leaves it open for work to begin on the road extremely soon, given that certain road-promoting interests seem to have carried on regardless.
See also: http://www.foe-scotland.org.uk/about/m74_diary.html
CH
Additions
Additional Information
28.06.2006 21:14
The BBC report also quotes Council Leader Stephen Purcell stretching the truth somewhat to justify pissing away (at least) £45M of Glasgow funds to make it's poorest communities more ill and more excluded.
He says: "will bring economic and social benefits to the entire west of Scotland".
The report says: "largely a redistribution of jobs from other parts" (11.62) and "effect of these various adverse impacts on these communities … very severe [during construction and permanently]" (11.35)
He says: "help reduce congestion in different areas of Glasgow".
Report says: "would not provide free flowing conditions on the Glasgow motorway network" (11.14) and "in fundamental conflict with the policy commitment to reduce vehicle use" (11.13)
The numbers refer to the Conclusions of the Public Local Inquiry, downloadable from:
http://scotland.indymedia.org/usermedia/application/6/1_m74_inquiry_report_conclusions.pdf
CH
Homepage:
http://www.jam74.org
Comments
Display the following 2 comments