Legal action against Crossrail-hole Tower Hamlets Council & their broibed liars
The Editor/Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/lawmedia 2006 | 15.03.2006 11:36 | Analysis | Indymedia | Social Struggles | London | World
Khoodeelaar No to Crossrail hole Bill Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 News Conference held in Brick Lane at 1400 hrs GMT Tuesday 14 March 2006. The fuller texts of the News Conference together with the campaign programme announced by Khoodeelaar in the run up to the Council elections scheduled for 4 May 2006 will appear here from 1500 hrs GMT on Wednesday 15 March 2006Reports will include 1. Which Tower Hamlets Crossrail-hole Councillor lied on satellite TV channel 2. Which ‘ethnic’ newspapers published misleading reports after the 22 January 2006 meeting against the Crassly conceived Crossrail plan-scheme-project Bill [UK House of Commons] held at the Brady Centre in Hanbury Street3. What action will be taken against which ethnic newspapers for carrying lying propaganda for the Crossrail hole-Tower Hamlets Council4. Which Tower Hamlets Councillor is implicated in financial deals with what part of the Crossrail-hole-affected area in London East One?5. How much Council cash is paid under what ‘ethnic’ programme to corrupt what part of the community in the East End of London and under what law?6. Which Tower Hamlets Council posed in front of the TV news cameras in January 2006 holding a banner that had been designed to legitimise their latest lie and which councillor gave answers – written by who? – that actually exposed the lie that Michael Keith’s ‘leadership’ had been telling the community all along?Tower Hamlets Council’s petition to Parliament is a shamTower Hamlets Council does want the shaft- tunnels and hole/s in the East EndTower Hamlets Council has bribed some ethnic papers to cover up the liesTower Hamlets Council [numerically largest] ‘Opposition’ Group has FAILED to spot the lying – at latest in publicTower Hamlets Opposition councillors [other than the Lib Dems] have failed to make any issue of the Crossrail lies by the controlling clique.[And many more reports]And many more items of news and campaign infoEarlier edition/sFirst reports Who is imposing the threat of ‘civil war’ against the Brick Lane London E1 via Crossrail attack?This was the question raised at the Khoodeelaar No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign news conference held in Brick Lane today.A resident of Princelet Street said that he was opposing the Crossrail hole attack on the community because it threatens his home, his community.he also said that the Crossrail planned hole attack the Brick Lane Area is like threat of civil wear on our community.To break up our community.He speaker Iqbal Hussain gave up his work to support the Khoodeelaar campaign news conference.[More on the Khoodeelaar news conference throughout the evening]Another Khoodeelaar Campaign news conference speaker and local business man Turan Miah said that the community was noticing how certain ‘ethnic’ papers were failing to tell the truth about the anti-social pro-Crossrail role of known some local Tower Hamlets Councillors.He said that if the truth about the councillors’ complicity is reported then the people would do to those councillors what the public were doping in some other countries against corrupt politicians.Another resident of the Princelet Street, off Brick Lane, Monaf Miah said that he had been supporting the Labour Part for many years. He is no longer able to support the same sort of politics after the Crossrail attack was brought to the area by the Labour majority council.[More reports due to be posted here throughout the evening on Tuesday 14 March 2006] br/> Khoodeelaaronline publishing arrangement at 1820 hrs GMT on Sunday 12 March 2006. The Khoodeelaar Manifesto 2006 seminar [1530 on Sunday 19 March 2006] will examine the contents of the Crossrail Bill in the context of the attacks plans that it contains against the East End of London. To prepare registered participants, we are publishing this list [below] extracted from the KHOODEELAAR Special reports compiled on the following themes and topics.© The Editor /Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/lawmedia 2006The evidence of the Crossrail Bill in the UK House of Commons now shows that the UK parliament has already been undermined seriously by Tony Blair.Blair is now seeking to reduce even more of the Parliament’s say over the executive and give the executive virtual powers to ignore |Parliament.How? because that Crossrail Bill is allegedly being scrutinised by a select committee of MPs. That is a farce.The whole process has been made subject to the dictates of the Blair Government via their team of overpaid 'counsel' and QC/s and those of the Bigger Business 'objectors' to parts of the hybrid Crossrail Bill.The utter majority of objectors, who include community and small business components and individual residents from The Brick Lane London e1 Area, have been relegated to the very last of the process.In the context of those post, the Existing 'scrutiny' 'by Parliament’ in the UK is already a sham.What is contained in the Crossrail Bill is neither economically sound nor socially desirable nor environmentally acceptable.Yet Transport Secretary Alistair Darling has already allocated an extra £100 Million in grants to the promoters of Crossrail while the Crossrail Bill is being only scrutinised.It is not yet in the statute Book but the Secretary of Sate is abusing his position openly and the Select committee has not said a word in opposition to that.So, Parliament is already undermined very seriously and the existing batches, groups and packs of MPs are not going to stand up for Parliament as the sovereign centre of the UK unwritten Constitution that is supposed to be.As was seen on 19 July 2005 when the same Crossrail Bill was given a Second Reading in the UK House of Commons with less than 30 MPs bothering to register a vote against.1. How much Council cash has the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council paid to ‘ethnic’ language ‘publications’ and ‘media’ for the purpose of propaganda on the clique’s role on Crossrail hole attacks on the East End?2. What academic reports – if any- have been published without Government aid or Council link or sponsorship that supports the claim that ‘Crossrail will bring benefits’? 3. Why did the former ‘head of the legal section’ in Tower Hamlets Council pick a fight with a London councillor over Crossrail? 4. What is the secret behind the silence of the so-called Opposition on the Greater London Assembly about the powers of the Mayor on Transport? 5. Who wrote that other [London] ‘EVENING STANDARD’ Crossrail plugging letter in February 2004 that got ‘signed’ by Tower Hamlets Council leader Helal Abbas [Abbas Uddin]?6. Is Tower Hamlets Council being exceptionally uncooperative with the ‘East London Advertiser’ when the Council refuses to disclose information even when that disclosure is requested under the domestic UK legislation ‘Freedom of Information Act’?7. Why did Alistair Darling bribe the Crossrail company with cash to the tune of £100 Million even before the Crossrail Bill ‘select committee’ has finished its own formal [and gong-through-the-motion, ritualistic scrutiny of the 'Crossrail Bill'? 8. Why has Tower Hamlets Council failed to make any comment on the Railways Act 2005? Is that because that Act, sneaked in by Alistair Darling as a de facto legislative tool to rush or expedite the passage of the Crossrail Bill through the UK Parliament? 9. Is it factually sustainable to say that the crassness at the centre of the Crossrail plan – the whole Crossrail Bill, not just the parts that affect or relate to the East End of London – is so pronounced, so thick, so total that its stench can be felt no matter where the investigator looks? Is this thesis supported by the latest Ken Livingstone Crossrail-hole-Bill propaganda sheet [which is imitated in the EAST END LIES the in-house spinner of lies for the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council]? In that Ken Livingstone propaganda sheet, ‘Whitechapel’ ‘Crossrail station’ is shown without showing all the proposed Crossrail stations in central London, thus creating the false image of Whitechapel being ‘as important’ as a Central London location! Is this lying propensity also evident in the Crossrail Company’s record of the past five years – whatever form it has existed in?[These questions will be explored and answers sought at the Khoodeelaar manifesto Seminar 2006 on Sunday 19 March 2006]
br />
The Editor/Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/lawmedia 2006
e-mail:
lawmedia@hotmail.com
Homepage:
http://www.khoodeelaar.com