Tower Hamlets Councillor identifies with Khoodeelaar! No to Xrail hole campaign
© The Author / Khoodeelaar / CBRUK / Lawmedia 2006 | 22.02.2006 08:34 | Analysis | Social Struggles | London
And the creeps that will be heading for consignment in the hole of their own crass collusion with Crossrail hole plan might all come from the Blairing freaks-box that carries the poseurs and the abusers pretending now to have been the democratic voice of the Tower Hamlets Council!
And the creeps that will be heading for consignment in the hole of their own crass collusion with Crossrail hole plan might all come from the Blairing freaks-box that carries the poseurs and the abusers pretending now to have been the democratic voice of the Tower Hamlets Council!
KHOODEELAARONLINE QUOTE no-to-crossrail-hole-motion-put-by- COUNCILLOR LOUISE ALEXANDER Wednesday 22 February 2006
“Tuesday, 21 February 2006
Unequivocal motion on Crossrail to Full Council
This Council confirms that:
It is this Council's duty to protect the community's rights not to suffer damage to the environment, health and business.
This Council categorically rejects:
• Any Crossrail intervention shaft in the Brick Lane London E1 area, as contained in the present Crossrail Bill in the House of Commons;
• Crossrail plans for an additional tunnel surfacing in Allen Gardens;
• The use of a conveyor belt to take spoil to dump in Mile End Park;
• The unsubstantiated, uneconomic and wasteful provision of a Crossrail station at Whitechapel which will necessitate digging an evacuation shaft in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
This Council resolves to:
• Use the strongest possible terms when this Council presents the arguments and the evidence in support of any previously-submitted formally-timed petition to the Crossrail Select Committee in the House of Commons.
• Members of this present Council undertake to lobby within their political parties and for the active attention of the Government to represent the interests of the residents of this Borough. This Council undertakes to take action in court and constitutionally to maintain, establish, reinstate and protect the community's right not to suffer the damage to environment, health and business which will be brought about by having an intervention shaft in this area.”
KHOODEELAARONLINE UNQUOTE no-to-crossrail-hole-motion-put-by- COUNCILLOR LOUISE ALEXANDER Wednesday 22 February 2006
KHOODEELAARONLINE QUOTE COUNCILLOR LOUISE ALEXANDER Wednesday 22 February 2006. This is the motion that I will be presenting to the meeting of Full Council on 1st March. It's an unequivocal statement of intent, designed to unite the Council on what has become the hottest topic for the local elections.
I have severe doubts that it will be passed in full. Firstly, officers sometimes restrict which motions are permitted at Full Council. Secondly, the Labour Group have a tradition of tabling amendments to our motions at the last minute, amendments that mute or even change the meaning of the motion. But any amendment or rejection of this motion will tell us a lot about the intentions of the ruling group.
I can't see how the Labour Group will be able to accept the clause that mentions Whitechapel. Cllr Keith has been running around Brick Lane area for the last week apparently trying to prove that he is now anti-Crossrail, conveniently ignoring the fact that were it not for diverting the Crossrail line so that there is a station at Whitechapel, there would be no need for a huge shaft in the Brick Lane area. A Crossrail station at Whitechapel has been the prize that our Council has been negotiating, while short-sightedly ignoring the disruption this will cause.
The Lib Dem Group have also submitted another motion about informing the public and consulting them on such issues as whether it a station at Whitechapel is indeed worth the disruption. The other motion also raises the spectre of secrecy at the way this Council is run. On the same topic, Cllr Khan will be asking how many times the group of 5 Councillors that constitute the Crossrail working group met, and which of these Councillors were present.
Another of our questions to Cabinet Members asks what's the difference between an intervention shaft, an evacuation shaft and a ventilation shaft and which of these are opposed by the Council's petition to the Government about the Crossrail Bill. As you may have noted from my previous Crossrail posting here, I was weak on this important detail.
Given that Mayor Doros Ullah barred the Lib Dems' call for an Emergency Meeting of Full Council before 14th February to debate Crossrail, this Crossrail motion on 1st March will be a key debate in what will be the last meeting of Full Council before the Council elections on 4th May. There will be a demonstration outside the Town Hall beforehand at 6pm. All political parties have been invited to speak.
KHOODEELAARONLINE UNQUOTE COUNCILLOR LOUISE ALEXANDER Wednesday 22 February 2006
© The Author / Khoodeelaar / CBRUK / Lawmedia 2006
e-mail:
lawmedia@hotmail.com
Homepage:
http://www.khoodeelaar.com
Comments
Display the following 3 comments