Time to free the BBC from 'America' and establish a 'constitutional Britain' independent from GWBushy 'America'
Time to free the BBC from 'America' and establish a 'constitutional Britain' independent from 'America'

©The Professor 2005


The moronness, the stupidity at a most basic level - and that is going farther back than even the age of John Major at Number 10 Downing Street - of the BBC’s ‘broadcasters’, is renewed and reexhibited throughout the day. And night.

As it was done again just before the 1230 London time ‘headlines’
on ‘BBC radio five live’.

The ‘broadcaster’ was allegedly interviewing ‘live’ a reporter who was filing an item on an English nominally locally controlled police force having publicised a claim about their device to catch ‘car criminals’.

A point came during the ‘broadcast’ when the concept of ‘entrapment’ was relevant.

But instead of probing its application to the item about the particular police force from a legal and ‘English law’ standpoint, the BBC ‘broadcaster’ felt impelled [or was he under standing orders within the BUSH-BLAIR Con Corporation? and so compelled] to publicise the existence of ‘America’ and what allegedly happens in ‘America’ about similar police practices!

Where does that leave the ‘English’ ‘citizen’?

Or, the listener in ‘Britain’ where the so called ‘BBC radio five live’ is supposed to be doing the broadcasts?

Is England so servile a part of whatever it is that ‘America’ is about that the BBC has to impose that word on things that do NOT belong in the facts, in the contexts and in the practices?

Or at all in the ‘constitution’, whatever the concept of a “British constitution independent from 'America' ’” denotes, connotes and means ?

How many other legal jurisdictions or constitutional ‘models’ do the BBC ‘broadcasters’ so reverentially cite and plug so blindly and stupidly ?

None.

The only and very m,marginal recognition that they show in any of their files and packages occurs in relation to the ‘colonies’ of English Canada, Australia, New Zealand and until the last quarter of the last century, Rhodesia and South Africa.

All the ‘BBC-approved’ ‘critics’ of the BBC are themselves manifestly deficient in ethical and moral integrity and lack the vital ingredients in their organisational and intellectual makeup that would have to be present in them for them to qualify as credible sources of moral authority over what the BBC’s role is and should be and how the masses in ‘Britain’ must be freed from this almost 90 year old machine of lies and brainwashing.

The BBC is tacky and has the same type of grabbing persons holding positions in it that are typified by the likes of those who write edit and control the so-called British press and the tiny non-BBC broadcasting mainly radio outlets.

Those include ‘Talksport’, ‘LBC’ in London and their even smaller regional counterparts in the tiny locations across the main populated parts of the British isles.

The idiocies of the BBC broadcasters are allowed to remain unchallenged by ALL the known and publicly accessible media of ‘mass’ miscommunication.