Not much of an "exchange" really at the moment, since the "exchange" is mostly on my part but here it is nevertheless, in case you would like to use this a "draft" for asking some questions to various media outlets, as well as adding your own questions. At the very least, we can let them know we know, and give them a little taste of "terror" perhaps.

I gave my word to the reporter that I would not mention either their, or their organisation's name, and so I have removed all reference to said identifications.

- - - - - - -

Thank-you for your reply.

There is a Peace Vigil taking place in London today where I have been told there will be people who have that information, in case you wish to obtain it. Sadly, I live overseas and am therefore not able to attend. The details regarding the Peace Vigil are contained at the bottom of this reply, for your information.

Apparently, Jean Charles did contractual jobs and did not have a fixed employment. Finding out where he had carried out some work recently, should prove interesting don't you think?

Considering he was under surveillance and had been allowed (a presumed "suicide-bomber"?) to get onto a BUS before arriving at the station (Stockwell) he was murdered at, it is highly unlikely this was the result of a "mistake", as I'm sure any reasonable person with an inquiring mind will agree, or at the very least, find quite odd?

In fact, one of the witnesses which sounds most reliable to me, personally - Chris Martin, states that he was actually THROWN by the plain-clothed Metropolitan cops inside the Tube carriage which was packed with passengers...

If these were Metropolitan cops and not special forces like the S.A.S. or some foreign agency empowered to take part in these anti-terro operations, why have their names not been released yet? Will they be released, do you think? Do you know their names?

Do you have any idea at all when footage from Stockwell showing what actually took place will be released, or if it will be released at all, please?

I would also like to ask you whether you know why the King's Cross footage of the four men accused of carrying out the 7/7 attacks has never been released, instead being replaced by footage from Luton Station which appears to have some anomalies when studied closely?

In fact, it has been later claimed (falsely) by the BBC, that the Luton footage of the four men was ALSO released in order to "find out more about what they were doing", when that is not the case. Footage of the four men at King's Cross has never been released (to the public). Isn't that so?

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4676861.stm

I am also interested (I hope I'm not boring you and that you are finding these questions interesting) in knowing for whom Richard Jones works for? He is the witness who gave out completely contradictory statements left, right & centre, to the media, and turned out to be practically single-handedly responsible, for originating and promoting the "suicide-bomber" conspiracy theory.

Have you any idea how I might be able to get in contact with him by the way? I have a few questions to ask him, even if accredited journalists will not, or cannot, for whatever reason. I'm sure he would appreciate the opportunity to clear his name, which is now being associated with "liar", "buffoon", etc, because of the wild and contradictory statements attributed to him by various media organisations?

Along with asking Mr. Jones whether he thinks it was very kind of the "suicide-bomber" to wait until he, and eleven others (according to some of the statements attributed to him), got OFF the bus, before activating the bomb? Yes, I think he would appreciate the opportunity of answering the questions I have to ask him, and clearing his name, if he has nothing to hide, of course. Who does he work for?

Is there a D.A. Notice at the moment, requesting that certain information concerning these London attacks should not be discussed via licensed media? To the best of my knowledge, it is permissible to at least acknowledge that a voluntary D.A. Notice is in place, otherwise I would not ask you this question.

And concerning the survivor of one of the explosions that took place on a Tube carriage - Bruce Lait. He relates that:-

Quote: "The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed UPWARDS as if the bomb was UNDERNEATH the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember ANYBODY being where the bomb was, or ANY bag," he said.

Cambridge News

Rather interesting too is it not? Have tough questions been asked of the chief of Police Sir Ian Blair regarding this? If so, why is the public not being shown his answers to them (and the tough questions in the first place)?

Have you heard an official explanation as to why Metronet stated that power surges had caused the explosions? Or why the Transport Police lied about power surges, if they never took place?

Did Jean Charles de Menezer's (or Menezes) recent contract jobs have anything to do with work on the Underground or for the National Grid or Metronet, at all? I know you have stated you do not know, yet surely the answers to these questions would be in the public interest. And therefore some proper investigatory journalism would be in order here.

The National Grid company contradicted both Metronet and the Transport Police by stating there was no power surge at all by the way, as you might already know. So who is telling the truth?

Do you find it extremely coincidental, to say the least, that the Route 30 bus was commandeered and diverted right outside the BMA residence, so doctors were then able to tend to the wounded practically immediately?

In fact, the bus exploded right outside Fortress GB's headquarters, which is the Company responsible for installing the London Underground's Smart-Card systems, and also has a vested interest in Bio-Metric Technology Applications, stocks of which will soar sky-high as a result of forthcoming anti-terror legislation requirements, which will be contracted out to Companies LIKE Fortress GB itself.

Is it not also strange that none of the four accused (for the 7/7 attacks) men left a "suicide-note" for their families? None of them. Not a single one.

And how come an exercise, with at least three scenarios running concurrently, was taking place on the same day and organised by a Company that works for, or is actually part of, London Underground? And are you aware that agencies like the F.B.I. were looking for civilian role-players to take part in like simulations?

Quote: "The bureau is seeking bids from firms that can provide at least 60 civilian role players to staff these training scenarios for 12 months (and perhaps for four option years). The role players portray bank robbers, TERRORISTS, MURDERERS, crime VICTIMS, and WITNESSES. They sometimes carry weapons..."

How to set-up a patsy

 http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0713051fbi1.html


Peter Power (Visor Consultants) claims that one of the scenarios of the 7/7 "Drill" ended up being very similar to the events that took place that same day. He also said he would not mention the name of the Company that hired his own Company to take part in this simulation. Do you know which Company he is referring to, please? Should this not be public knowledge? Again I have to ask - is there a D.A. Notice, or a D. Notice even, in effect?

Thank-you for taking the time to read this letter.

Here is the relevant information about the Peace Vigil taking place today, in case you are interested, for whatever reason:-

From: Brazilnet [mailto: brazilnetwork@onetel.com]
Sent: 24 July 2005 21:57
To: Name withdrawn
Subject: Stockwell Tube Peace Vigil - MONDAY 6PM


Dear friends, please circulate this message!


STOCKWELL TUBE PEACE VIGIL - MONDAY 6PM

Following the death of Jean Charles de Menezes on Friday 22nd July Lambeth Stop the War Coalition have called a Peace and Solidarity Vigil at Stockwell tube station at 6pm on Monday 25th July. George Galloway will be speaking.

All sections of the community are invited and strongly encouraged to attend. Please find a leaflet for the vigil attached.

John Rees, Stop the War Coalition, said: "However horrific the bombings in London on 7th July and however important it is to secure the safety of the public, there can be no excuse for the police adopting a shoot-to-kill policy which guns down innocent people in cold blood. This is precisely the crime for which we hold the terrorists responsible. The police in a democratic society have a duty to act with higher standards. They should be trying to diminish the climate of fear, not add to it."

END MESSAGE
- - - - - - -

Please know I will take the utmost care to remove absolutely all references to your name AND organisation, in this exchange, if I decide to share this with anybody else, because I appreciate your taking the time to reply. And I will also do so, in the hope that you might get back to me when you find some or any answers at all to these questions which many people are asking on the internet and in houses and cafes and bars all over the world. The difference, at this point in time, between a great portion of the public's awareness, and what licensed media are reporting (or non-reporting), is indicative that the licensed media is not serving the public's interests. What would you reply to that, please?

Yours sincerely,

Danny.

P.S. I had to leave about a gazillion questions out too, because I know you must be a busy person. Particularly about Netanyahu's prior warning, also Rudy Giuliani's association with 9-11 and his presence there in London on the same day, and former head of the Mossad Efraim Halevi's outstanding prescience in describing the "multiple, SIMULTANEOUS explosions" which took place on 7/7, on the very same day, in an article in the Jerusalem Post, when the truth about the synchronicity of the Tube explosions was not known until 9/7 when the Police declared that simultaneous explosions had indeed occurred. Let alone Halevi's claim that the attacks were "near-perfect". Since only a person who knows what the "terrorists" plan actually was could know whether they were perfect, IMperfect, or NEAR-perfect.



----- Original Message -----
From: "NAME REMOVED"
E-mail address removed
To: "Danny"
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Jean Charles de Menezes


> As yet I don't have that information.
> Rgds
> Name removed now


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Danny"
> At: 7/24 16:08
>
> Dear Name Removed,
>
> Greetings.
>
> I would like to know who Jean Charles de Menezes worked for. Can you help,
> please?
>
> Regards,
>
> Danny.

The ONLY solution is to enforce The Plan against the traitorous Zionist NWO False Flag Op mass-murderers