CCTV sabotage or something more sinister?
og | 16.07.2005 14:38 | Sheffield
Thank God MI6 do a sloppy job and thank Heavens some people still have the guts to tell the truth. The only ones who are buying the official story, which is falling apart, are police and politicians who want to enforce more obscene Draconian terror laws.
London Stagecoach Employee Says Bus Bombing Suspicious
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach,
the company responsible for the majority of London buses.
Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site
of the bus bombing last Thursday.
The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted.
The driver notes the following about CCTV maintainence.
"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. This is done by a private contractor.... So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came
to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working. Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different.
Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV
is regularly maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras were not working.
Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV
a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker?
Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack,
case closed! That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
It's beyond doubt that these four Muslims were framed.
They were most likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan
and then brought back and told they were to take part
in an important exercise to test national security.
Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains
and then detonate the bombs remotely.
Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and kill other innocent people?
Og
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 15 2005
We received an e mail from an employee of Stagecoach,
the company responsible for the majority of London buses.
Our contact works a route roughly one mile from the site
of the bus bombing last Thursday.
The bus driver pointed out that the number 30 bus was the only one to be re-routed after the initial bombs went off in the London Underground, every other bus carried on its normal journey, but for some reason this bus was diverted.
The driver notes the following about CCTV maintainence.
"CCTV gets maintained at least 2 or 3 times a week and can digitally store upto 2 whole weeks worth of footage. This is done by a private contractor.... So when I heard that the CCTV wasn't working on a vehicle that's no more than 2 years old since last June.....I'm sorry that's rubbish, I work for the company I know different."
Also a point of interest....last saturday a contractor came
to inspect the CCTV on the buses at the depot, According to my supervisor the person spent more than 20 hours over that weekend, 20 hours to see if the CCTV is working. Also that person who came was not a regular contractor, for security reasons the same few people always come to the depot to carry out work, this time it was different.
Drivers in the depot already think the so called bombers had inside help because it was to organised. Some even think it had help from the company."
I have received other information suggesting that the CCTV
is regularly maintained and checked. The police pay the bus company to check it, and the bus company makes a substantial profit out of this, so all parties benefit from keeping the CCTV systems working.
This information makes it all the more suspicious that the bus cameras were not working.
Was the mammoth 20 hour inspection session of the CCTV
a means of disabling the CCTV, or something even darker?
Were the contractors, who were not familiar to the bus company employees, actually placing the bomb?
But don't worry, the media are drooling over this picture of supposed suicide bomber Hasib Hussain, who we are told detonated the bus bomb.
Well, it's a grainy picture of a Muslim guy with a rucksack,
case closed! That's good enough evidence for me, I'm going back to sleep.
It's beyond doubt that these four Muslims were framed.
They were most likely hired as MI6 spies, sent to Pakistan
and then brought back and told they were to take part
in an important exercise to test national security.
Give them the rucksacks, get them on the trains
and then detonate the bombs remotely.
Do you really believe for a second that guys with 8 month babies and guys who taught diasbled schoolchildren would want to blow themselves up and kill other innocent people?
Og
og
