American Dissident Voices Broadcast of June 14,2003



My program last week, in which I discussed White identity as the
necessary basis for everything we do, generated quite a bit of
mail from readers. Although most mail was favorable, several
writers did express concern about my discussion of religion.

Because I said that we must think of ourselves as White people,
and that we should put race -- what we actually are -- higher in
our scale of values than religion -- what we believe -- some
writers took me to task for being non-Christian and some took me
to task for being anti-Christian, and accused me of wanting to
eradicate Christianity from a future White society.

I can't really reassure those who worry that I am a
non-Christian, though I appreciate their concern for my soul. I
believe that we live in a world of matter and energy, and that
there is no other world outside the world of reality, and that
the divine-- the true and therefore supremely good -- lies not in
ancient religious writings, which are often mistaken, nor on
another 'plane' of existence, which doesn't exist, but within the
reality of the past, present, and especially the future, and is
discoverable by the scientific method applied by the minds of the
best of our evolving race.

Most importantly, I believe that the divine path is also the path
of the upward development of our race. And I also believe that
the current limitations on our knowledge are not limits or faults
of the scientific method, but are instead the current limits of
the human condition and the human brain, which even among our
best minds is but a millimeter above the primordial swamp on a
journey to the stars. And I further believe that the best, most
racially-conscious Christians agree with me on these last two and
most important points. They may couch it in religious terms -- a
journey to God instead of a journey to the stars; respect for
God's will versus respect for Nature's laws -- but both they and
I understand that our uniquely beautiful and creative race must
survive and progress if our lives are to have any meaning at all.

As for those who think that the future White state envisioned by
the National Alliance would persecute Christians, nothing could
be further from the truth. The National Alliance does not dictate
the religious beliefs of its members, though none may be Jewish
in genes or beliefs. There are National Alliance members who
profess Christianity. They are Christians who put their race
first, and set aside differences in religion for the sake of
racial survival. The National Alliance unites into one community
those who want to restore the traditional racial basis of
society. We also want to go beyond the vision of racial
preservation of our forefathers. Based on what we have learned
about race in the modern era, we believe we can and should enter
an era of racial progress.

The National Alliance, like its founder Dr. William Pierce,
recognizes that one of the great needs of our race is for freedom
-- freedom to inquire, to study, to question, to know through
one's own independent quest for truth. We want to build a society
fit for White men and women to live in, one that is in full
accord with all our needs. And that must be a society that, to
the maximum extent possible compatible with racial survival,
grants freedom of conscience and freedom of inquiry to its
citizens. Freedom of conscience includes freedom of religion.

Would we use -- or allow -- the power of the state to be used to
suppress religion? No, for the reasons of freedom of conscience
outlined above, we would never do that. And further, the history
of the 20th century gives us such horrifying and recent examples
of the results of such anti-religious fanaticism that they can
never be forgotten. We remember the destruction and looting of
the churches, and the wanton butchery of clerics, nuns, and
worshippers which occurred in the Soviet Union and in so-called
Republican Spain, in which an anti-religious mania was inflamed
by the Communists as a cover for the Jewish destruction of the
existing White society, the killing of thousands of White
Russians and Spaniards, and the replacement of a native ruling
class with an alien one.

Would we shut down the charlatans and hucksters of the TV
evangelism racket, who prey on the innocent and trusting
less-educated members of our race? Yes we would, and so would any
decent White Christians if they or we controlled the television
and radio airwaves as the Jews do today.

Any racialist would know that Jerry Falwell and his ilk, who
purposely and maliciously foster a loyalty among their White
followers to Israel and the Jews, are undisguised traitors to
their people; and their treason and deception, in a sane country
that intended to survive, would not be tolerated for even one
second.

Just listen to Falwell in an interview he gave to CBS [
 http://tinyurl.com/e1b0 ]:

"It is my belief that the Bible Belt in America is Israel's only
safety belt right now... There are 70 million of us. And if
there's one thing that brings us together quickly it's whenever
we begin to detect our government becoming a little anti-Israel."

In April 2002, even that faithful servant of the Jews, President
Bush, expressed his opinion that it would be good if Israel
withdrew its tanks, and stopped using them to kill Palestinians
in their own towns on the West Bank. What did Falwell do? He sent
an outraged letter to the White House which was followed by a
rallying of his flock, who immediately flooded the President with
100,000 emails protesting this shocking infringement of the Jews'
right to keep and bear arms and kill the Gentile dogs with
impunity. Bush decided the tank question wasn't so important
after all.

Falwell continued to expand on his favorite theme and First
Commandment: "There's nothing that would bring the wrath of the
Christian public in this country down on this government like
abandoning or opposing Israel in a critical matter... I really
believe when the chips are down Ariel Sharon can trust George
Bush to do the right thing every time."

According to Christian Zionist John McAteer in the same article,
"God gave the land of Israel to the Jewish people. ...Every grain
of sand between the Dead Sea, the Jordan River, and the
Mediterranean Sea belongs to the Jews." Not a word about any land
-- anywhere -- belonging by right to White people or any other
people, including Christian people. These liars have deceived our
people so that they and their wealth and their work and the blood
of their sons and daughters are totally in the service of the
Middle Eastern parasite. As I said, no people could tolerate such
deception and destruction, and no racially conscious White
person, Christian or non-Christian, should have to tolerate it
for an instant. Suppressing treason and suppressing religion are
two totally different things.

Would we allow any religion to have state power? No, the history
of the West since the Christian era has included many massacres
of White people by White people in the name of religion -- even
more than the massacres of Whites by Jewish Communists, even
though the latter were larger in scale. One thinks of the Thirty
Years' War, the Crusaders versus the Greek Christians, and many
others. Allowing one sect political power over all the others and
over non-believers is a formula for repression, resentment, and
possibly, if the wrong sect comes to power, the ultimate stifling
of the greatest hope for the future of our kind in the universe,
the free inquiry of science and the application of its
discoveries to ensure our racial survival and progress.

A sincere racialist Christian, whose work I genuinely admire and
who I consider to be a man of high integrity and a long-time
friend, told me recently that his vision of a future White state
would be a Christian state in which the Bible would be the only
law and in which no non-Christian philosophy could be promoted --
on pain of death. I think his zeal has (temporarily, I hope)
blinded him to reason.

First, I would point out to him that his brand of racialist
Christianity, though it is undoubtedly truer to White Western
traditions than are most churches today, is a tiny and despised
sect among Christians as a whole, and would be vigorously opposed
in any future Christian state. The beliefs of most Christians
about the "only law" would be diametrically opposed to his. His
fellow racialist Christians might find themselves among the first
to undergo the "pain of death" for wrong beliefs if such state
power was given to anyone in the name of religion. And I would
further point out that the genie of free inquiry has been
released in our society since the Renaissance, and its benefits
are so enormous, both practically and spiritually, that very few
people, religious or non-religious, are willing to give them up.
Any attempt to suppress freedom of religion and freedom of
thought will instantly have as its implacable and passionate
enemies millions of the best White minds, many of them men and
women with their hands on the levers of power through their
positions as educators, technicians, and scientists. Imposing
rigid religious dogma -- or rigid anti-religious dogma -- is a
complete political and practical non-starter in the West, and all
efforts to do so on the part of well- or ill-intentioned Whites
are utterly wasted efforts. We do not have time for wasted
efforts, and we strongly oppose any attempts to impose religious
uniformity on our people.

How would a future religion-based state prevent its 'elders' from
having a new 'revelation' and completely changing the principles
on which the state was founded? That's what happened to the
Mormon Church a few years ago. Their doctrines had long favored
White people almost exclusively. Some of their religious writings
discussed this explicitly. With minuscule exceptions, only Whites
were proselytized and only Whites could be leaders of the Church.
But one day a 'new revelation' occurred and the leaders of the
church magically discovered that the old interpretation of sacred
scripture was wrong and they declared that, overnight, their
racial policy was to be reversed. Thereafter non-Whites could
become church leaders and non-White countries were to become the
focus of missionary efforts.

A similar thing happened to the Dutch Reformed Church in South
Africa. That church had long supported the freedom and
independence of the Afrikaner people who made up its membership.
It was a bulwark of White racial survival and the survival of
White civilization on the dark continent. It fully supported the
Apartheid or 'separate development' policy of the South African
government, which was an absolute necessity for White survival
there. Despite all the economic pressures of the Jews (who
control the financial establishment of the West) to destroy White
South Africa, as long as the Dutch Reformed Church stood firm,
White South Africa survived. Despite the assassination of South
Africa's great leader Dr. Verwoerd in 1966, as long as the Dutch
Reformed Church stood firm White South Africa survived. Despite
the institution of Jewish television programming in South Africa
in 1975, as long as the Dutch Reformed Church stood firm White
South Africa survived. Despite the fact that the Jewish
Oppenheimer family was long the most powerful economic entity in
South Africa, as long as the Dutch Reformed Church stood up for
apartheid, White South Africa survived. Despite the screaming,
spitting, and 24/7 vilification of South Africa for decades by
the Jewish media in the West, and the resultant institution of
crippling state sanctions on that country which went on for many
years, as long as the Dutch Reformed Church supported White
survival, South Africans did not bend and they maintained their
freedom and independence. But as soon as the leaders of the Dutch
Reformed Church had a 'new revelation,' and declared that the
teachings of their church had been wrong for 400 years and that
the races were equal after all, the South African people gave up
their country voluntarily and voted for a new constitution which
guaranteed them slavery, savagery, and murder on a scale that
boggles the mind, and which also guarantees their extinction as a
people unless a radical change in consciousness occurs there
soon.

Now it really does not matter much if the 'new revelations' that
occurred in the Mormon Church and the Dutch Reformed Church were
the results of naive faith, creeping secularism, outside
pressure, or bundles of Jewish cash. The fact is they occurred.
And the only thing that could possibly have stopped them from
occurring was if the leaders of those churches and of those
societies had put race first, and made racial survival a
non-negotiable principle that could never be changed.

Making religion the first principle of a society entails a great
risk to the race, since the religions vying for state power in
our age are all based on an interpretation of ancient writings
which are, to put it mildly, subject to a wide range of
interpretations.

But, to be fair to religion, making anything except race the
highest value of your society is dangerous. Making economic
principles -- whether of the egalitarian socialist or rapacious
capitalist variety -- your highest value is a danger to the race.
The state bureaucrats who thrive under international socialism
love dependent people who always vote to give the bureaucrats
more power -- and who is more dependent, and politically
dependable, than the Black and Mestizo underclass? The rapacious
capitalists love cheap labor and a dumbed-down consumer class
which is very susceptible to mass marketing techniques. Who fits
those profiles better than the same underclass beloved of the
bureaucrats? Who ships factories to China's and Mexico's slave
labor pens, and who brings non-Whites to work in their
chicken-rendering plants and agribusinesses by the millions? Yes,
basing your society on economic principles can be fatal to your
people, too.

We must make racial survival and racial progress the two most
important principles of the state. Our race's very nature
requires freedom of conscience and therefore freedom of religion.
And our racial progress depends on freedom of inquiry.

What we who care about the survival of our race should be doing
is putting race first at all times, and making all of our efforts
count in showing our fellow Whites the necessity of standing
together. White Christians should not disparage the publication
of explicitly non-Christian racialist books or articles, and
non-Christian racialists should not attack racialist Christians
who are sincerely raising the racial consciousness of their
flocks. And we should all put our shoulders to the wheel and
sacrifice until it hurts in the cause of building a White
community which will some day gain the power to secure a free and
independent state exclusively for the benefit and interests of
White people. And such a state will of necessity be one that
allows freedom of thought and conscience on matters of religion.
Without such a state, we all die, and our children suffer and
disappear into the enslaved and degraded masses of the Jewish
global plantation.

We must begin where the founding fathers of the United States
left off, and make the racial basis of our society even more
explicit than they did. Racial preservation and racial progress
must be made the first principles of our Constitution, and those
principles must not ever be subject to amendment. No
'revelation,' no sentiment, nothing must ever be allowed to
threaten the survival of our people.

Of course, a Constitution is just a piece of paper. It means
nothing without a strong community dedicated to its principles,
and willing to die rather than see it overthrown. We are building
that community in the National Alliance. Please join us.

***

The philosopher Savitri Devi called it 'enthralling.' Dr. William
Pierce called it "a survival manual for the White race." Revilo
Oliver of the University of Illinois, one of the leading
classicists of the last century, called it "unique... a veritable
encyclopedia of everything that is directly pertinent to our
race's position in the world today."

The book is William Gayley Simpson's Which Way Western Man?,
which was unavailable for years and which has just been
republished in a new edition by National Vanguard Books.

William Simpson began his career as a graduate, summa cum laude,
of a major theological seminary, and became a Franciscan brother
working among the poor and disenfranchised in an attempt to make
a better world. Simpson saw the magnitude of the problems he and
his comrades were trying to solve, and realized that the
ameliorative work in which they were engaged would never solve
the problems they were tackling, and could at best only slow down
the steady decline of our civilization and of human quality
generally.

He read the great philosophers, particularly Nietzsche, and from
the 1920s to 1980 kept a written record of his quest for truth
and for the meaning of life, which he found in the never-ending
quest to increase human excellence and quality. Which Way Western
Man? is the result of that quest, and it is one of the most
important books of the last 100 years.

Published in 1980, the first edition sold out within a few years
and was not reprinted, as the author was working, throughout the
80s and until his death in the 1990s, on a series of revisions
and additions which reflected new knowledge and the mature final
insights of the author. At last, the monumental job of revision
has been completed and the second edition of Which Way Western
Man? is now available.

Which Way Western Man? is more than just a work of history,
philosophy, and science, although it is all of that -- it is also
the story of a life, the life of an unusually sensitive and
compassionate man, a man who could understand the mission of St.
Francis as well as that of Nietzsche -- a man who could see our
position in the universe and relate it to the ordinary reader in
a way that no other writer has ever done. I recommend Which Way
Western Man? with my highest commendation. It is a life-changing
book.

Which Way Western Man? is available as item number 407 from
National Vanguard Books. This huge, encyclopedic work of 1070
pages is $39.95 plus $3 shipping and handling in the U.S., $5
elsewhere in the world. That's item 407 for $39.95 plus $3 in the
U.S., $5 world, to National Vanguard Books, Box 330, Hillsboro WV
24946 USA. Or you can order online by clicking on the book image
at natvan.com.