Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Lies, Power and Destruction

PeaceMonger | 26.03.2003 20:27

Dr Eric Herring, senior lecturer in International Politics at Bristol University, questions the Government's arguments for war with Iraq.

From the Bristol Evening Post
Wednesday 26th March 2003:

According to the British government those of us not in favour of war are morally inadequate because we are not backing the liberation of the Iraqi people.

How soon we forget. Just two weeks ago the British Government was saying, to quote Jack Straw: "I don't regard Saddam Hussain staying in place as optimal but it is not part of this resolution to change the regime".

In other words, this was to be a war to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction.

The British and American claimed to have secret information that proved Iraq had a revived nuclear weapon programme and vast stocks of chemical and biological weapons.

Already, we are being prepared for the possibility, indeed likelihood, that no serious capability of any of this kind will be found.

Tony Blair yesterday said: "British security services have tried to search out weapons dumps of the IRA for 30 years - not with a great deal of success."

It is worth recalling that a key element of the British Government's "proof" turns out to be stolen from an American student's essay passed off as British Government intelligence.

Another key document which supposedly shows Iraq importing uranium from Africa has been declared fake by United Nations weapons inspectors.

One more piece of the picture which is being ignored is the role of previous British governments in contributing to Iraq's weapons programmes. Under Margaret Thatcher, Britain backed the building of chemical plants which they expected would be used to make chemical weapons. This was at a time when Iraq was gassing Iranian forces. Soon after the Iraqis went on to gas the Kurds.

We ought not to forget what this war is meant to be about - and we shall see if claims of Iraqi weapons programmes are actually justified.

Of course, the liberation of the Iraqi people from the rule of Saddam Hussain is something we would all welcome.

But we should not lose sight of the fact that this was meant to be a war to protect us from the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.



Taken from the Tuesday 25th March edition of the Bristol Evening Post:

DR ERIC HERRING SAYS US AND BRITISH TROOPS MAY FACE A LONG WAR TO TAKE CONTROL OF IRAQ

11:00 - 26 March 2003


Dr Eric Herring, senior lecturer in International Politics at Bristol University, says US and British troops may face a long war to take control of Iraq THE last time American forces fought the Iraqis, in 1991, the war on the ground was over in three days. We are only five days into this war but there appears to be no prospect of it being over soon.

Why are matters different now? Twelve years ago, the Americans preceded the ground war with a month of air bombardment - this time there has been none of that.

The coalition forces have half the number of troops that were committed to the Gulf War in 1991.

The first Gulf War was marked by combat in open desert, which made it much easier to target Iraqi forces. Today, the coalition forces face combat in towns and cities.

Most importantly, in 1991 the objective was simply to remove Iraqi forces from Kuwait - this time the aim is to capture all of Iraq.

Why did the United States launch the war in this way? It appears that they hoped for a quick Iraqi military coup to get rid of Saddam Hussein, followed by surrender.

They also hoped that they might kill Saddam in a missile attack.

The question then is, where is the war going to go from here?

There are three possible outcomes - two of which are nightmare scenarios for the US and British.

The one they hope for is that there will be a sudden Iraqi coup or mass surrender.

The second possibility is that they will end up laying siege to Baghdad, a city of five million people, and Basra, a city of nearly two million people.

Water and electricity supplies will not survive and civilians will start dying in their thousands.

This is what happened last time. Already, in Basra, lack of water has put most of the city's population at extreme risk.

The third possibility is street fighting to take these cities at enormous cost to both sides. They would not only have to fight the regular Iraqi army but also the elite of the Iraqi military - Saddam's Republican Guard and Special Republican Guard - which in 1991 quickly withdrew from Kuwait.

The most feared outcome for the US and British from the second and third scenarios is that they would have to negotiate with Saddam Hussein.

PeaceMonger

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. One more monsterous possibility — James
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech