It's interesting watching the government and the news media working
together to condition the public to support a war against Iraq. This
week's issue of Time magazine -- that's the May 13 issue -- has a
painting of Saddam Hussein on the cover in which he looks like a
sinister Colombian cocaine lord, with dark glasses, a straw hat, and a
scowl. The story about him and his family inside gives us a pretty
greasy image of the bunch: certainly not the sort of people you'd want
living next door.

Is Time's image of Saddam accurate, or is it a deliberately distorted
caricature? I've never met Saddam or even spoken with anyone who does
know him personally, so I can't answer that question with certainty. But
the same issue of Time magazine also presents a whitewash of Ariel
Sharon's murderous incursion into the Jenin refugee camp. And, of
course, the magazine is part of the Time-Warner-CNN Jewish media
conglomerate. Time's editor-in-chief is Norman Pearlstine. And all of
the Jewish media are beating the war drums against Iraq. And so is
everyone in the Bush government, from the Jews behind the scenes like
Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle on up through the top figureheads, such
as Donald Rumsfeld and George Bush.

What's especially interesting to me about all of this is that it is a
180-degree change from the situation we had 30 years ago, during the
Vietnam war. Then the media and the government, instead of being aligned
as they are now, were directly opposed to each other, with the Jewish
media making up what amounted to a cheering section for the Viet Cong.
The equivalent today would be for Fox News to interview former Taliban
officials instead of Defense Department bureaucrats and Israeli
diplomats and for Time magazine to depict Ariel Sharon on its cover with
a sinister expression instead of Saddam Hussein. Well, that's another
story. What's clear today is that where Jewish interests are concerned
-- where the Middle East is concerned -- the news media and the
government are in lockstep. Perhaps you remember how, before the U.S.
bombing of Afghanistan began last fall, all of the Jewish media were
pushing hate propaganda against the Afghans, trying hard to convince the
American public that we ought to bomb them.

There were television specials about how mean the Afghans were to their
women. In one Kabul street scene that was broadcast over and over again
in various anti-Afghan news segments, an Afghan man was shown
ineffectually swinging what looked like a fan belt at the legs of a
woman, presumably his wife. The implication was that this was typical of
the way Afghan men treated their women. Bush's wife announced on
television that we needed to "liberate" the Afghan women. Then, after a
few weeks of intense hate propaganda by the media, the bombing began.
And it looks as if that's exactly what they have in mind for Iraq.

Well, we expect that from the media. As long as they are controlled by
Jews they will support Jewish interests rather than American interests.
Anyone who expects otherwise is living in a dream world. More
disappointing is the behavior of the Gentile politicians and
bureaucrats. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld seems to be trying to
outdo George Bush as the government's champion liar. Rumsfeld has been
raving all week about the need to "take out" Iraq as soon as possible,
because Saddam Hussein is trying to develop weapons of mass destruction.
We need to get rid of Saddam because he is a threat to the peace and
security of the United States, et cetera. Every time I turn on Fox News,
they have Rumsfeld or some other government "expert" warning us about
the danger of not invading Iraq and getting rid of Saddam before he
develops nuclear or biological weapons.

And every time I see or hear such propaganda I must repress the urge to
shout: "And what about Israel, you lying SOB? What about Ariel Sharon?
You pretend to be concerned about nuclear and biological weapons being
in unauthorized hands, but Israel is the only country in that part of
the world that has an unauthorized arsenal full of nuclear and
biological weapons. You never mention the danger of a homicidal maniac
such as Ariel Sharon having his hands on nuclear and biological weapons.
Iraq never has attacked the United States, but Israel has. Have you
forgotten already about Israel's attempt to sink the USS Liberty and
blame it on the Egyptians?"

Then, there is that pompous little bigot we have for an attorney
general, John Ashcroft. He was on TV last Saturday giving a commencement
speech at Catholic University in Washington, DC, and preaching a crusade
against terrorism and terrorists. He was telling us how evil terrorists
are, how different they are from us, how they hate everything we stand
for, and how we must root them out and destroy them. Watching this grim,
tight-lipped little religious fanatic rave against terrorists was an
experience in surrealism. Does Ashcroft believe that Palestinians blow
themselves up because they like to do that sort of thing? Does he
believe they would be using suicide bombers if the Jews didn't have an
occupation army in Palestine and weren't killing Palestinian women and
children and bulldozing Palestinian homes? Does he believe that they
would be strapping explosives on their own women and sending them into
Jewish restaurants and discos if they had tanks and F-16s and Apache
helicopters like the Jews are using against them?

And when Ashcroft rages self-righteously about waging war against
state-sponsored terrorism he never mentions the state that sponsors more
terrorist activity than any other, and that is Israel. Perhaps Saddam
Hussein would like to sponsor terrorism against other countries, but it
is Israel, not Iraq, that actually sends teams of trained assassins into
other countries to kill and terrorize: into Jordan to squirt poison into
the ear of a popular Muslim cleric or into Lebanon to use a car bomb to
kill a potential witness against Ariel Sharon in a war-crimes trial.

Well, of course, Bush and Rumsfeld and Ashcroft and all the rest of that
slippery crew understand these things. I never have said that they
should be hanged for being stupid or ill-informed but for being liars
and traitors: they should be hanged for letting American interests go to
hell while they scramble to serve the Jews at America's expense. And now
they're hell-bent on dragging us into another war because that's what
the Jews want: certainly not because it will benefit America.

And I have to tell you that I have mixed feelings about all of this. On
the one hand I am automatically, instinctively against anything the Jews
and their collaborators in Washington are for. If they want us to fight
another war for them, I'm automatically against it. If they tell us that
Saddam Hussein is an evil person and ought to be killed, my reaction is
that there has to be something good about anyone they hate so much. But
I also try to be cold-blooded and rational about these things.
Anti-Jewish feeling is stronger now, all around the world, than it has
been in a long time, and the basic reason for this very welcome
development is the servile obedience of the Bush government to Jewish
demands.

It's the U.S. government allowing itself to be used by Israel that
caused the September 11 attack, that resulted in the war against
Afghanistan, that has emboldened the Israelis to brutalize and repress
the Palestinians even more than usual, that is leading us toward a war
against Iraq, and that may yet lead us into a Third World War. All of
these things in themselves are undesirable, and yet they are having an
overall good effect by raising anti-Jewish feeling, and that in the long
run may outweigh everything else.

It's like Affirmative Action. The forced integration of Blacks into our
White society in America has had many evil effects. Easily the worst of
these effects has been the increase in miscegenation, the increase in
mongrelization. But Affirmative Action has been the most irritating
aspect of racial integration for many White Americans: the most
unpopular aspect. Many ordinary White Americans are willing to accept
miscegenation, in some cases because their churches tell them that
that's what Jesus wants, and in other cases because they don't feel
personally threatened by it. But they do feel threatened by Affirmative
Action. They feel that it's fundamentally unfair to take jobs or
promotions away from Whites and give them to less-qualified Blacks just
because they're Blacks. They feel that it might deprive them personally
of employment or a higher salary. And so my attitude toward Affirmative
Action is, right on! The more the better! White Americans need to be
irritated by the racial problem.

I feel the same way about the new campaign Blacks are pushing to obtain
reparations for slavery. It sounds like a really stupid idea with no
merit at all. I mean, if anybody should pay reparations, Blacks should
pay them to us for bringing their ancestors over here from the African
jungle, teaching them the rudiments of personal hygiene, tripling their
life expectancies, putting them on welfare, and tolerating their
criminal behavior for the past 400 years. But Blacks want trillions of
dollars -- and I mean trillions -- in reparations for the unpaid labor
of their slave ancestors, and they figure that now that White men have
become such a spineless bunch of wimps, this is a good time to push for
it.

Of course, most Whites still don't feel threatened by the reparations
campaign; it still seems to them more theoretical than real. But the
campaign is gaining momentum, and I think it'll have a really salutary
effect on most White Americans when it finally dawns on them that
they're being asked to cough up a sizable piece of change for Blacks
they feel already have gotten more than enough from them. So I'm hoping
that the reparations campaign will continue growing and will cause a lot
of irritation.

I believe that many racially conscious White Americans will agree with
me on this: that it's worth putting up with Affirmative Action and
reparations, just so Blacks as a whole will be seen as a threat by
Whites who might otherwise be tempted to tolerate them. I believe that
many patriotic Americans can see the silver lining in the September 11
attack that served as a wakeup call for all Americans and convinced many
who needed to be convinced that we must regain control of our
government, that we must get the Jews off our back.

But a Third World War? Am I really willing to accept a Third World War
just so more people will become conscious of the danger of permitting
the Jews to control our government? Isn't that like throwing the baby
out with the bath water?

If we back off a bit and look at our situation realistically and from a
viewpoint which takes in the whole picture, one of the first things we
realize is that we already are involved in a worldwide war -- or at
least, a race-wide war. Up through the end of the 19th century our
people ruled the world unchallenged. And then came a century of
self-destructive insanity. Two fratricidal world wars of unprecedented
destructiveness and the rise of communism stand out in the 20th century.
We killed off tens of millions of our own people in these wars, and
Jewish communists killed tens of millions more in a selective way,
deliberately butchering the best of our people in an effort to make us
easier to rule. The 20th century was the century during which the mass
media rose to dominate the thinking of the masses of our people -- and
fell into Jewish hands.

The 20th century also was a century of unprecedented scientific and
technological progress for our people. We made enormous strides forward
in transportation, manufacturing, communications, agriculture, the
eradication of disease, and weaponry. If in addition to our
technological advances we had retained control of our mass media, not
let ourselves be lied into two world wars, and nipped Jewish Marxism in
the bud, we would be in an absolutely unassailable position now.

But we did let the Jews gain a stranglehold on our mass media of news
and entertainment, we did let ourselves be lied into two world wars, we
didn't stamp out communism before it had wreaked a dreadful toll, and we
let all of our technology be turned against us. We gave it away to other
races, foolishly thinking that we were being good Samaritans. We went
into the Third World and helped the non-Whites there control the
diseases that were keeping their populations in check. We showed them
how to increase their agricultural production so that they could support
vastly larger populations. We permitted them to replace their spears and
sticks and stones with modern weapons that we had invented.

The result, of course, was a population explosion among the non-White
races, so that they now outnumber us 12 to one around the world. And
this non-White population explosion that we foolishly caused has
resulted in the destruction of our planet's tropical rain forests and
other natural habitats and the extinction of thousands of species of
plants and animals. White Americans don't pay much attention to this
because it is happening mostly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, but I
find it distressing. Even if the explosion of Black and Brown races
didn't pose a direct competitive threat to the White race for breeding
and living space on the planet, I greatly prefer a world with more rain
forest and more big cats and members of other non-human species, and
fewer Black, Brown, and Yellow featherless bipeds.

Some of the cleverest of our own people now are making great efforts to
find an AIDS vaccine that will halt the plague that otherwise might trim
the Black population of Africa back to a more manageable size. Others
are concerned about more efficient ways of getting relief supplies to
parts of the Third World that are suffering from chronic famine.
Microsoft chairman Bill Gates, certainly an otherwise intelligent man,
has given hundreds of millions of dollars for medical aid to lower the
death rate among African infants and children. All of this is suicidal
insanity.

Of course, we have other problems that seem much more pressing, but the
problems of habitat destruction and species extinction caused by the
overpopulation in the non-White parts of the world will catch up with us
very soon. We are sharing the dwindling resources of this planet with
far too many non-Whites. It's pretty clear that to deal effectively with
these global problems we need to reorient the way in which most of our
people look at the world. We all need to understand that we still are as
much subject to Nature's laws as we ever were. We all need to understand
that we are living in a finite world and are competing with other races
for survival in this world. We need to root out the egalitarianism, the
"we're all one species" nonsense, the whining "why can't we all just
learn to get along with each other?" lunacy that has pervaded our
policies toward other races and replace it with a hardheaded racial
survivalism.

There are two ways to go about this. One way is for us to let ourselves
be pushed into a Third World War. That might go something like this: The
Jews continue their insistence that the United States use its military
power to bomb and invade Iraq and set up a puppet government, more or
less as we have done in Afghanistan. The ever-obedient Bush government
goes along, using bases in Saudi Arabia. Outraged Muslim militants in
Pakistan stage a coup there and lynch all of the politicians and
bureaucrats who have been collaborating with the United States. U.S.
military units that had been operating inside Pakistan in the hunt for
Afghan patriots are ambushed by Pakistani military units and butchered.
The Bush government retaliates by bombing Karachi. Frightened Saudi
leaders demand that the U.S. military units in Saudi Arabia for the
assault on Iraq leave immediately. The Bush government, on orders from
Ariel Sharon, refuses. OPEC imposes a total oil embargo on the United
States and threatens similar embargoes on any countries in Europe that
collaborate with the United States in the assault on Iraq. That includes
Germany, which serves as a staging area for the U.S. military in its
assault on countries in the Middle East. There is rioting in German
cities as German citizens protest being dragged into the U.S. war
against Israel's enemies, and at the same time a wave of Muslim suicide
bombings takes place in the United States, mostly in crowded shopping
malls, killing hundreds of Sally Soccermoms.

North Korea decides to take advantage of the U.S. problems at home, in
Europe, and in the Middle East, and invades South Korea. The Bush
government threatens a nuclear strike unless the North Koreans withdraw
immediately. The Chinese government decides the time has come to take
possession of Taiwan and does not believe that the United States will
try to wage nuclear war against China and North Korea at the same time.

Well, you can use your imagination to complete the scenario. The good
news that could come from a Third World War is that with an end to
intervention by misguided White do-gooders, AIDS, famine, and
cannibalism would be able to whittle the African population back down to
pre-colonial levels pretty quickly. Some European governments certainly
would be overthrown, and perhaps in a few cases patriotic governments
would replace them. In the United States just about anything might
happen. At least, no more welfare checks would be going out, and the
urban rabble would be eating each other.

No matter what developed, however, it hardly could lead to anything
worse than leaving the present course of events on track, because that
course leads to certain extinction for our people. A Third World War at
least would reshuffle the cards.

There is, of course, a better way, and that is to break the Jewish
stranglehold on our mass media, regain control of our government, and
then follow a rational plan to do with surgical precision and with much
less destruction of our planet that for which a Third World War might or
might not lay the groundwork. That's the way I have chosen. It's
certainly not an easy way, but it is a way that becomes surer and surer
as more and more decent and responsible White men and women join me
along this path.

I have prepared a video presentation that outlines my path. If you find
my American Dissident Voices broadcasts interesting, I think you'll also
find my 51-minute video presentation interesting too. I'd like to send
you a copy to view for yourself and to share with your friends. Send $5
to National Vanguard Books for the compact-disk version of this
presentation or $10 for the VHS cassette version. If you're outside the
United States, make that $6 and $15 respectively. Ask for my 51-minute
video presentation.