London 8 30 PM Sat 06 Dec 2014
Indymediadotorgdotuk is suppressing the Comment below that takes a look at the Indymedia outfit along with a detailed review of the Guardians deep rooted bias against Muslims and man ore faiths
Indymediadotorgdotuk is suppressing the Comment below that takes a look at the Indymedia outfit along with a detailed review of the Guardians deep rooted bias against Muslims and man ore faiths
London 8 30 PM Sat 06 Dec 2014
Indymediadotorgdotuk is suppressing the Comment below that takes a look at the Indymedia outfit along with a detailed review of the Guardians deep rooted bias against Muslims and man ore faiths
It may be because the Indymedia has lost the original ways
The Guardian has been losing its original promise for ages
But so has the much more recent Indymedia
Mr Ahmed may also be a target of antiMuslim Mindset that pervades Fleet Street
(see more on the Guardian’s ‘Mohametans’ below)
There really isn’t a platform that can be called genuine place for free campaigning publishing in Britain today
People therefore feel less than enthusiastic about posting on Indymedia site as well
As a telling paradox, and referring to the dishonesty that has been discussed in the main pits (about the Guardian), there has been a plethora of “titles” and “sites” that are in fact capitalising on the intellectual and ethical vacuum (see main article)
Over the years, certain “radical, campaigning” names have been given massive space by both the Guardian as well as by parts of the BBC, until recently the Newsnight programme, but an examination of the key evidence shows that the “radical” journalists have also been
“Western” ones
The serious flaw in that is that most facts, most grass roots, most historic and cultural and empirical evidence is beyond these “radicals” and is only known to the people, thinkers, campaigners in the African, Asian countries
But they are never allowed anywhere near the same “recognition” let alone the space
Mr Ahmed is among those so denied
The Guardian did not been recognise the word “Muslim”
It used to call Muslims “Mohametans”!
How crazy is that attitude?
In the run up to the 1947 events, the Guardian refused to refer to Muslims as such or even use the spelling Moslem while it had no problem is using the ordinary spelling for other faith groups in the BIP-subcontinent!
BIP Bangladesh India Pakistan
The Guardian, on the facts, has had a problem in treating all Faith and Cultural Groups equally and fairly
