Set aside for a moment Sir Ian Blair and his daily race-hate lies paid for by London's longsuffering council tax payers. Every time they say 'suicide bomber' on the news my guts go over. Mostly because I know the newsreaders are just trotting out anonymous military sources, but we are SUPPOSED to feel sick. It's part of a psycological operation to get us to hate Muslims in which the highest level BBC editors and managers are complicit.
Photoshopped frame grab from the official Scotland Yard website
Bombers away!
Journalist - the magazine of the National Union of Journalists
http://www.nuj.org.uk/inner.php?docid=85
January/February 2007 - page 31
'911 Truth' campaigner TONY GOSLING says the media should not call people 'suicide bombers' without real evidence
I AM becoming increasingly alarmed, in the run-up to a possible invasion of Iran, by the way British newspapers and broadcasters are reporting terrorism. Through systematic bias and the influence of a lying government, the BBC, which is supposed to be our national benchmark medium, has turned on the public and become an accessory to the crime.
The coverage of the July 7 London bombings has become a frightening case of trial by television. Unfortunately, as evidence to the contrary trickles out, our media editors' verdict looks increasingly questionable.
The BBC crossed a lethal professional line when it decided to refer to the four 7/7 suspects as 'suicide bombers'. Ignored is inconvenient evidence including the advance warning to the Israeli embassy and the untidily Photoshopped Luton CCTV image (a railing behind the figure at the back passes in front of his arm).
By rubber stamping Muslim guilt here in the UK the corporation has taken on a leading role in an anti-Muslim pogrom. BBC spin now flies in the face of its motto carved on Broadcasting House, "Nation Shall Speak Peace Unto Nation", as its one-sided presentation of modern terrorism builds a neo-con case for a religious war against Islam, and for Islamic oil and opium.
A professional journalistic blunder is committed with almost every new story of a "suicide bomber". Whether a bomb explodes accidentally, by remote control or if a "bomber" believes he has a shipment of cocaine in his bag he's still most likely to be termed a "suicide bomber" in the news.
In April 2004 Bush's Iraq chief Paul Bremer initiated the Iraqi insurgency by closing down the Al Sadr newspaper. The reason? The editor had printed a front-page lead story that a "suicide bomb" in a bus queue was, according to eyewitnesses, a missile fired from a helicopter. The newspaper was closed down by the US Army the next day.
This simple lie, referring to a "suicide bomber" on the say-so of anonymous military contacts with little or no evidence, is a propaganda narrative of which Josef Goebbels himself would have been proud. It sends out a clear message demonising the target racial or religious group as insane, murderous and impossible to reason with. Dead men condemned with no proof and no court case - the presumption of the "suicide bomber" is not only bad journalism, it seeds genuine terrorism.
When a racial or religious group, after false-flag attacks, becomes demonised and targeted by racists it begins to fight back and real terrorism is born.
See the photoshopped Luton CCTV image on the Scotland Yard site here, take a deep breath, and save to your hard drive it in case a masonic mole takes it down.
http://tinyurl.com/snbjv
full size 'cctv frame grab'
http://www.met.police.uk/news/terrorist_attacks/groupcctv.jpg
Hope to meet serious lovers of truth and righteousness here:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358797.html
Tony
Journalist - the magazine of the National Union of Journalists
http://www.nuj.org.uk/inner.php?docid=85 January/February 2007 - page 31
'911 Truth' campaigner TONY GOSLING says the media should not call people 'suicide bombers' without real evidence
I AM becoming increasingly alarmed, in the run-up to a possible invasion of Iran, by the way British newspapers and broadcasters are reporting terrorism. Through systematic bias and the influence of a lying government, the BBC, which is supposed to be our national benchmark medium, has turned on the public and become an accessory to the crime.
The coverage of the July 7 London bombings has become a frightening case of trial by television. Unfortunately, as evidence to the contrary trickles out, our media editors' verdict looks increasingly questionable.
The BBC crossed a lethal professional line when it decided to refer to the four 7/7 suspects as 'suicide bombers'. Ignored is inconvenient evidence including the advance warning to the Israeli embassy and the untidily Photoshopped Luton CCTV image (a railing behind the figure at the back passes in front of his arm).
By rubber stamping Muslim guilt here in the UK the corporation has taken on a leading role in an anti-Muslim pogrom. BBC spin now flies in the face of its motto carved on Broadcasting House, "Nation Shall Speak Peace Unto Nation", as its one-sided presentation of modern terrorism builds a neo-con case for a religious war against Islam, and for Islamic oil and opium.
A professional journalistic blunder is committed with almost every new story of a "suicide bomber". Whether a bomb explodes accidentally, by remote control or if a "bomber" believes he has a shipment of cocaine in his bag he's still most likely to be termed a "suicide bomber" in the news.
In April 2004 Bush's Iraq chief Paul Bremer initiated the Iraqi insurgency by closing down the Al Sadr newspaper. The reason? The editor had printed a front-page lead story that a "suicide bomb" in a bus queue was, according to eyewitnesses, a missile fired from a helicopter. The newspaper was closed down by the US Army the next day.
This simple lie, referring to a "suicide bomber" on the say-so of anonymous military contacts with little or no evidence, is a propaganda narrative of which Josef Goebbels himself would have been proud. It sends out a clear message demonising the target racial or religious group as insane, murderous and impossible to reason with. Dead men condemned with no proof and no court case - the presumption of the "suicide bomber" is not only bad journalism, it seeds genuine terrorism.
When a racial or religious group, after false-flag attacks, becomes demonised and targeted by racists it begins to fight back and real terrorism is born.
See the photoshopped Luton CCTV image on the Scotland Yard site here, take a deep breath, and save to your hard drive it in case a masonic mole takes it down.
http://tinyurl.com/snbjv full size 'cctv frame grab'
http://www.met.police.uk/news/terrorist_attacks/groupcctv.jpg Hope to meet serious lovers of truth and righteousness here:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/12/358797.html Tony
Homepage:
Comments
Hide the following 26 comments
Pogrom
28.12.2006 05:20
The Muslim population of Britain is growing at a significant rate.
Some "pogrom"... Maybe it's a "genocide". "Ethnic cleansing" perhaps?
This just a bunch of anti-Western hype not borne out by any facts.
Truth and Fiction
Pure garbage
28.12.2006 10:00
Image compositting is a very simple process (but very difficult to pull off convincingly... even harder to fool a forensic scientist). Imagine you have a series of pictures and you have a pair of scissors. You cut out the bits you want and lay them on top of one another. Now this is where digital compositting diverges from old photomontage: in Photoshop (and its ilk) you cannot have one bit of a layer tucked under anything.
To tuck things under, you have to make the effort to delete data out the way or to make a new layer with just the bits to sit on top of the other layer(s).
Therefore, the bit you have ringed is so obvious not a result of any image fakery, it is startling that no-one has taken you to one side and told you "You're barking up the wrong tree!"
Whilst agreeing that the BBC is in step with the rest of the Western media agencies in pouring fat on the fire when it comes to relations with the muslim communities, which in some quarters like the Daily Star is pretty much 'incitement to racial hatred', I'm afriad your article sadly misses those very real issues and delivers a rehash of old tosh that could easily have been culled from PrisonPlanet or WRH.
Apart from that, the article itself does little to put meat of the bones of its title.
Compo Sit
Short and Long term
28.12.2006 10:03
...
Provocateur plants?
28.12.2006 10:21
It is was very easy to get Moslems who had been bullied in school, or antagonistically stopped and searched in the street to take up violence against the society that rejected them. The induced psychological disorders make it east to mislead people.
The rot in the BBC has always been there, but became much worse when Thatcher had Alastair Milne dumped. That was being planned in 1954 along with inducing the Miners Strike.. It was a broadcast on the morning of an election in Thtacher's time that precisely fitted Michael Edwardes' forecast that caused me to write ""EVIDENCE OF A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST DEMOCRACY IN THE U.K" doing a google for exactly that yesterday brough it up. Doing it today does not. Are there censors at work?
Ilyan
Ignored Is Inconvenient Evidence that Contradicts Tony Gosling's Assertions
28.12.2006 10:50
It is a rucksack harness not a railing, FFS!
Schnoz
Faked image - Khan's legs are reversed
28.12.2006 11:36
The real giveaway that this image is a forgery is 'Sid' Khan's legs are not reflected properly in the glass behind him. Sid is the first of the group.
I've discussed this at my blog
Related - in that the official fantasy of suicide bombers of 7 July 2005 was used as an excuse to kill Jean Charles de Menezes
A recent article on my blog briefly discusses Gematria of the number eleven in relation to the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes
Gematria eleven is important in other 'ritual sacrifice' events.
dizzy
Homepage:
http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/
pogrom ?
28.12.2006 12:17
C.O.G
Where are the prison camps?
28.12.2006 12:36
And perhaps you heard about rendition? 2,000+ "suspects" rendered but only 200+ at gitmo -- where are the rest? Still in secret CIA prisons or murdered?
SACC
Homepage:
http://www.sacc.org.uk/
Revealed - over 100 secret prisons
28.12.2006 12:41
Disappearances in the War on Terror have formed an integral part of the Bush administration's programme of secret detention. This latest report by Cageprisoners: Beyond the Law: The War on Terror's Secret Network of Global Detentions, highlights the wide-reaching extent of those countries that house these detainees, generally at the behest of the US government. The report shows that out of the 120 prisons identified worldwide, 72 have been, or are currently being used by the US to interrogate detainees.
By piecing together statements of released detainees, work of investigative journalists and human rights organisations, we provide the most definitive and up to date list of prisons used in the ‘War on Terror.’
Commenting on the findings of the report, Manfred Nowak, UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, wrote, "…Cageprisoners publishes a comprehensive report which reveals the systematic practice of enforced disappearances in a global network of secret places of detention."
Further the Chair of the British Institute of Human Rights, Geoffrey Bindman, states that in the policies of the War on Terror,
"This report is directed at one glaringly disgraceful element in that strategy: the detention without charge or trial and the physical abuse of those suspected of involvement in terrorism."
The release of the report aims to catalyse the process of bringing transparency to a situation deliberately shrouded in obscurity. Deliberately denying prisoners access to open courts or any semblance of justice, whilst being tortured and coerced into giving false confessions is not befitting of any civilised society. It is imperative that transparency swiftly be brought to this process, so that the innocent can pick up the remains of their shattered lives and be returned to their loved ones.
The report consists of a list of detention facilities, an accompanying document to explain the terms and provide analysis of the findings, and finally a map, pinpointing the network of ghost detention sites worldwide:
* Beyond the Law – Report
* Beyond the Law – List of Prisons:
* Beyond the Law – Map of Global Network
SACC
Homepage:
http://www.sacc.org.uk/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=322&catid=35
"I want a sweetie"
28.12.2006 13:57
Well, I can see the watcher having a laugh at IMUK's expense very soon. Well at least it puts the incredible claims of Photoshop fakery clearly in focus.
Can we hid the whole thing before more nutters latch on to it?
Judas Priest
its not complicated
28.12.2006 16:45
incorrigible
I'll show you a nutter
28.12.2006 17:26
There's a nutter for you
The last commentator called for the whole thread to be censored by Indymedia before it attracted more nutters! I get accused of being a nutter often but it's always without any analysis. They are never detailed or specific like I am when I accuse Tony Blair of being dernged and deluded. So please witch-accusers be more specific. For example, this is how it's done
Tony Blair's Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Charles Clarke has just recently criticised Gordon Brown in psychological terms. This blog has speculated before on Tony Blair being manic. We now bring you a better analysis.
It is suggested that Tony Blair suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder incorporating mania.
Individuals with NPD do not respond well to treatment
1.
since they do not accept they have a problem
2.
since they do not complete a course of treatment
Therefore it is usually untreated. Blair may take medication which leads to weight gain or bloating. Dosage is difficult because the condition is not stable. Medication will take approx. 6 weeks to become effective.
NPD involves emotional problems
1.
empathy / emotions generally,
2.
aloofness and superiority,
3.
poor grasp of reality, because
4.
a self-image is created – it is the self-image that is important and protected. The self-image is often far removed from reality or any rational basis. Consider Blair's recent comments in the States re: inner-certainty,
5.
Lies – this is protecting the self-image,
6.
absolute need for adoration and respect (called Narcissistic supply),
7.
sensitivity to criticism,
8.
NPD individuals often chose odd people to respect. In Blair's case, he respects fame e.g. rockstars, because that's a source of adoration.
NPD individuals crave adoration – consider Blair's visits to the States. If that adoration is absent, they'll go off and do something else which provides that adoration e.g. The lecture circuit.
When challenged, sensitivity to criticism can cause withdrawal and depression. They have a certainty that they are superior to everyone else simply by existing.
Suggestions:
Personal criticism should be directed at the self-image which changes over time – it's as if it has to do gymnastics to survive. You are able to recognise this because it strikes you as deluded or far-fetched although you can sense that it's worse than you think, he really does believe it e.g.
“It's worse than you think. I really do believe it”,
"We will not win the battle against this global extremism unless we win it at the level of values as much as force, unless we show we are even handed, fair and just in our application of those values to the world.” in the States Aug 2006
The following quotes are from
"A day like today is not a day for soundbites, really - we can leave them at home - but I feel the hand of history upon our shoulders, I really do."
8 April 1998, Belfast - On the Good Friday agreement.
"We are asked now seriously to accept that in the last few years-contrary to all history, contrary to all intelligence-Saddam decided unilaterally to destroy those weapons. I say that such a claim is palpably absurd."
18 March 2003, House of Commons
"Do I know I'm right? Judgements aren't the same as facts. Instinct is not science. I'm like any other human being, as fallible and as capable of being wrong. I only know what I believe."
2004 Labour Party Conference, referring to the fact that no WMDs had been found in Iraq.
"He may want to pose as the nice Dr. Jekyll, but we know that, deep down, he is still the same old Mr. Howard."
Commons Hansard (26 Nov 2003)
"The spirit of our age is one in which the prejudices of the past are put behind us, where our diversity is our strength. It is this which is under attack. Moderates are not moderate through weakness but through strength. Now is the time to show it in defence of our common values."
16 July 2005, at the Labour Party national conference.
"Sometimes it is better to lose and do the right thing than to win and do the wrong thing."
9 November 2005, in the House of Commons during Prime Minister's Questions
"This is not a clash between civilisations. It is a clash about civilisation."
21st March 2006 - Foreign Policy speech at Reuters Headquarters, London, England
Wow, I can't believe we just met Mr. Bean!
--Homer Simpson's comment after meeting Tony Blair
I believe Tony Blair is an out-and-out rascal, terminally untrustworthy and close to being unhinged. I said from the start that there was something wrong in his head, and each passing year convinces me more strongly that this man is a pathological confidence-trickster. To the extent that he ever believes what he says, he is delusional. To the extent that he does not, he is an actor whose first invention — himself — has been his only interesting role.
o
Matthew Parris, The Times, March 18 2006[3]
dizzy
Homepage:
http://blogs.cjb.net/dissident/
Racist article
28.12.2006 17:48
This article shouldn't be simply hidden it must be deleted and so must any other post that questions 7/7 if Indymedia is to retain any credibility.
.
...
28.12.2006 18:26
He's not a nutter in the legal sense. He's a cold and lucid mass murderer.
But that really has nothing to do with your antisemitic theories.
Judas Priest
Scotland Yard & Netanyahu in the frame for deadliest London attack since Blitz
28.12.2006 20:48
How did they know, was the knowledge connected to Peter Power and Visor Conultants' contempraneous 'drills' and have the police ever investigated Scotland Yard!
What is the point in forking out millions to pay for the mostly hard working Met. when their mostly masonic leaders are the biggest crooks in the land?
The SY Drugs squad were famously referred to in the Sunday Times by author of 'Filth' and ex officer Duncan MacLaughlin as the "most professional criminal cartels in Britain".
And if this police corruption doesn't stop RIGHT NOW Londoners should refuse to pay their Community Charge Council tax (which should be levied on landlords not tenants anyway).
Lets not forget the poll tax demo which - again due to the driving of a criminal police transit van at speed into a group of peaceful demonstrators kicked off the Poll Tax Riots in Trafalgar Square back in 1990.
Tony Gosling
Homepage:
http://www.bilderberg.org
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
28.12.2006 21:14
George Orwell
Homepage:
http://www.msxnet.org/orwell/1984
Wow!
28.12.2006 22:23
You know, they shot the guy who invented the everlasting lightbulb and destroyed his research.
I take it you have already researched and evidenced that the story wasn't total crap to start with (hence the retraction), that if there was a warning that it wasn't really shortly AFTER the bombs went off, or that the warning wasn't a planned diversion by the bombers or just pure coincedence (I know conspiraloons just don't believe in anything as nutty as "coincidence").
So, you can now share your research where you have spoken the story author, all the interview subjects, and can corroborate your allegations on a tested timeline?
Or, maybe just maybe, could it possibly be that you see guilty Jews because you WANT to see guilty Jews? I mean if you find this story credible, it would mean that the Israelis were the only ones warned and in turn that makes them somehow complicit.
But that would be a terrible accusation in the face of the corroboration* you are about to present to us.
*not prisonplamet, wrh, rense, shanghai news or pravda rehashes.
Judas Priest
So
29.12.2006 01:04
Tony Blurrr
Pshop
29.12.2006 11:09
look
A (dodgy) photo speaks a thousand words
29.12.2006 11:47
I remember this photo (with its inconsistencies highlighted) appearing in The Independent a few months back.
I suppose Judas Priest would say The Independent is an anti-Semitic conspiraloons newspaper…?
Bob Fisk for Foreign Secretary
Bob Fisk for Foreign Secretary
29.12.2006 13:58
You got a link to the story so we can see what it said and who said it?
I can't find it in their archive. Do you mean this Guardian piece?
Here are a few extracts:
"Given such confusion, the proliferation of 7/7 conspiracy theories is hardly surprising. Ever since the Kennedy assassination, people's faith in the official narratives surrounding seismic political events has been steadily eroding. In their place have come what Don DeLillo, in Libra, his brilliant psychological novel about Kennedy's assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, calls "theories that gleam like jade idols". Such theories are seductive precisely because, as DeLillo puts it, they are "four-faced, graceful". Employing a 20/20 hindsight whose starting point is always cui bono - who benefits? - they masquerade as an interrogation of the facts but are actually a labyrinth of mirrors"
"At first sight, Dunne appears as far removed from this paranoid ether-world as you could imagine. Ushering me into her flat, she says she would dearly love to "turn the clock back to before July 7, before I had all these questions" and, for a moment, I believe her."
The article isn't very sympathetic to the J7 Truth people and is conspicuously lacking in any 3rd party comment on the validity of the image. Which is kind of odd since newspapers are chock a block with photoshoppers who could spot a composit a mile off.
Why don't you all have a whip round and get the picture analysed by a forensic lab?
But wait, I have a premonition, you'll come back having paid for confirmation that the image isn't fake and you'll assert that the lab is "part of the conspiracy".
Judas Priest
photo
29.12.2006 15:16
C.O.G
There is one very sensible comment.
29.12.2006 15:17
Remwmber that Orwell went to war fighting alongside Anarchists against Franco.
Ilyan
Credulous Fools
29.12.2006 20:15
To start with watch the BBC2 TimeWatch programmes from 1992 on Gladio, these explain how much of the terror attacks in Europe during the 60' and 80's were carried out by agents of the state:
Timewatch: Operation Gladio - Part 1
The first of three programmes about `Gladio', the secret terrorist network operating in Europe. Discusses the network's creation, after the end of the Second World War, from a group of Nazis remaining in occupied territories, and in resistance to the rise of communism. Reveals the role of the CIA in the political affairs of post-war Europe through their manipulation of `Gladio' and the network's influence in the internal affairs of almost every European country.
Timewatch: Operation Gladio - Part 2
Second of three programmes exploring the influence of `Gladio', a state-sponsored terrorist network organisation operating in Europe. This programme examines the Bologna railway bombing in 1980 ostensibly by the Red Brigade. The programme argues that the Brigade had been inflitrated by right-wing agents who conducted a series of atrocities that so terrified citizens that they called for greater state security.
Timewatch: Operation Gladio - Part 3
Third of three programmes exploring the influence of `Gladio' a terrorist network organisation operating in Europe. This programme examines the kidnapping and subsequent of murder of Aldo Moro.
The videos above might not be on GoogleVideo forever - they are also available via Bittorrent - search for them if you want to download them.
More info on the Wikipedia:
Then watch The Power of Nightmares:
This film explores the origins in the 1940s and 50s of Islamic Fundamentalism in the Middle East, and Neoconservatism in America, parallels between these movements, and their effect on the world today. From the introduction to Part 1:
"Both [the Islamists and Neoconservatives] were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world. And both had a very similar explanation for what caused that failure. These two groups have changed the world, but not in the way that either intended. Together, they created today's nightmare vision of a secret, organized evil that threatens the world. A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. And those with the darkest fears became the most powerful."
Then listen to the Craig Murray and Nafeez Ahmed talks linked to above:
Craig Murray: Legality, Morality and the War on Terror
Nafeez Ahmed "INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: THE SECRET HISTORY"
And Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone's showns,
Ralph Schoenman: The London Bombings
The London Bombings, Part One: The Footprints of State Terror
The London Bombings, Part Two: Inventing the Scapegoats
The London Bombings, Part Three: Unravelling the Official Fiction
The London Bombings, Part Four: The De Menezes Execution - Prelude to the Death-Squad State
After that you will probably have a different take on the attacks of 7/7.
The comment from "." above asking for this article to be deleted for the credibility of Indymedia is laughable, Indymedia would have less credibility if people were banned for questioning the states story about 7/7 - what happened is nothing new, this kind of thing has been an aspect of the secret states imperial methods for a long time and the only antidote to it is for people to open their eyes, the "war on terror" is a lie and the false flag attacks can only be stopped by people stopping believing in them. It's time to wake up if we are to stop the next war (Iran, probably).
9-11 OPEN YOUR EYES THE WAR ON TERROR IS A LIE
The 9-11 International Inquiry (Toronto, May 2004) featured over 50 writers and activists who exposed the 9-11 crimes and subsequent cover-up. Here is a sample of the talks from some of the speakers: (in order of first appearance): A.K. Dewdney, Michel Chossudovsky, Ellen Mariani, Nick Levis, Thomas Kimmel, John McMurtry, Col. Robert Bowman, John Valleau, Michael Dietrick, Jamie Hecht, Ralph Schoenman, Kyle Hence, Jim Hoffman, Paul Thompson, Barrie Zwicker, Joyce Lynne, Bruce Gagnon, Rocco Galati, Phil Berg, Richard Sanders, Ian Woods, Michael Ruppert, Webster Tarpley, Ken Jenkins, Mathias Broeckers, Carol Brouillet, Jeremy Wright, John Gray and Bill Douglas.
cynic
THE WAR ON TERROR IS A LIE... and 9/11 & 7/7 Truth is a joke!
29.12.2006 22:21
You would have to be a special kind of stupid or a totally arrogant zealot not to understand that.
Everything the "Truth" movements postulates, falls apart like a clown's jalopy- with no credible professional support.
Why the hell would Gladio change anyone's mind about 7/7? I can't see any logical path between the two, other than Gladio was activated by the other. Why is it any more significant than the Home Office wanting to look tough?
So the fact there is a dangerous officer in CO19 with a hair trigger and a boss that refuses to have punished means that four Asians didn't do it?
The fact that the Home Office keeps busting people on false charges means there is a grand conspiracy, an inside job? That's some leak and totally overlooks the possibility that MI5 are getting shit intellegence- possibly from people tortured by the CIA & friends.
The problem with the "Truth" movement isn't its questions. It's the fact it starts with a loded deck on totally mental assumptions and picks apart and distorts everything it can get its hands to reverse engineer support for a presumption= total rubbish.
On top of all that, it's a totally pointless diversion away from addressing the real crimes under our nose:
- 2 innocent suspects (at least) shot by the same CO19 officer and no action taken.
- Daily doses of Islamaphobia emanating from the mainstream.
- Seceral false terrorist attack alarms.
- UK airports used for illegal redition and arms flights. No action taken.
- The illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with MASSIVE civillian casualties, causing great security threats to us and paid for by the taxpayer. No action taken.
There is a mountain of evidence to support these issues and mostly the culprits are very visible. What has "Truth" done? Ignored it all in preference for planing paranoid Columbos.
I suppose you will assert that not a single foresensic image expert on the entire planet (not even Iran or North Korea) has challenged the validity of that image because they are all scared of the conspirators... unlike the few no-names that run a forum that nobody apart from their immdeiate family would care about if they burned to death in a car accident. Those ones have the conspirators running scared I suppose?
Total nonsense.
Bigger cynic
WHO DID 7/7?? and why?
08.04.2007 21:31
7/7 like Bali and 11march spain and the placing of Mohammed ATTA in Hamburg, Germany
all done to implicate the local intelligence services (THEY) and force their continued silence.
Here is how:
I (WE) am the CIA or Mossad and I need the foreign spy-agencies help to keep quiet about my 911 atrocity and other evil false flag murder in Iraq and around the world.
How do we achieve this?
Easy. WE find out which muslims they are having undercover contact with, and "help" THEM to justify ever higher budgets by supplying THEM with info about how dangerous the muslims are. WE let THEM give us documents that show how THEY are in contact with the "muslim terrorists" ...
Next, WE make the muslim terrorists throw bombs and kill many innocents in a most public bloodbath. WE do this activly, we supply the bombs, we even organize drills etc... no matter how WE do it, we are safe. THEY will never be able to implicate us, because they risk a public outcry if WE go public with the documents.
The only way THEY can get out of this is to wait a generation.
In the 7/7 case:
MI5 and MI6 must now make a believable case against muslims, however contrived,
to keep up the veneer of "honest fight against terrorism" and stop the CIA from feeding the documents to newspapers, documents that show how MI5 INSTIGATED DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
As they did. Kind of. MI5 did not plant the bombs, the CIA did. But they will not sound believable should THEY claim it in their defense.
Does this make sense to you?
Solution? IMHO for us PEOPLE the solution is to get rid of ALL INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES.
It is better to HAVE NO SPIES that have employ spies that work against OUR COMMON GOOD.
We may have to suffer some consequences, but a government can never have the trust of the people, worse, can never really achieve any human progress, if it can be blackmailed.
u2r2h
Homepage:
http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/