At around 10am (Friday 22/7), police shot dead an unarmed man on a train in south London. They had trailed him from a block of flats which they had under surveillance, allowing him to board a bus and then enter Stockwell underground Station, despite apparently believing that he was a suicide bomber.
first reports | more on shooting | train driver threatened
News of the 'shoot to kill' policy raised urgent concerns from Muslims and non-Muslims alike, especially since the man (now named as Jean Charles de Menezes) turned out to be completely unconnected with the bombers. After police admitted the man was innocent on Saturday a hastily organised vigil was held at Stockwell Station on Sunday 24 morning. [reports and photos - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | audio | video ] A second much larger vigil took place on Monday 25 evening. [Pics and report | Spontaneous march | Photos of vigil and demo] On the following Wednesday 27 another protest took place outside the Metropolitan police headquarters at Scotland Yard. [Photos and Reports 1 | 2] [Audio interviews]
- The Jean Charles de Menezes Family Campaign has called for another vigil and a memorial service on Friday 29 at 5.30pm, Parliament Sq. [Flyer (pdf)]
Comments
Hide the following 24 comments
I give a toss Max!
30.07.2005 01:28
dave hewitt
I give a toss Max!
30.07.2005 23:53
Elaine
e-mail:
elaineteresagrant@yahoo.co.uk
Jean Charles RIP
16.08.2005 21:53
I never met him but his murder, cos' that is what is was, must now be focal point to turn the tide and stop these evil arrogant bullies, who think they can pull on a uniform and get a 'right' to kill , mutilate and destroy lives. The good ole Britis copper is gone, replaced thugs & scum
steve
e-mail:
sbenn_43@yahoo.com
Bring the murderer to justice
17.08.2005 13:23
Don Tomo
ASHAMED OF BRITAIN
17.08.2005 13:25
P Thomas
Police Were Right To Shoot
17.08.2005 15:28
The justice for jean campaign is a waste of time, and the police shoot to kill ot protect policy should remain to stop terrorists and mindless and stupid idiots like this Jean Charles de Menezes or what ever the stupid idiots name is.
British Guy
In perspective
17.08.2005 16:26
30-number of hours it took for Brazilian govt. to declare itself 'shocked' by killing at Stockwell
30-number of innocent Brazilians shot dead in one night by police in Rio de Janeiro
Still ashamed?
Frank Walker
I Believe Murder is in Place
17.08.2005 23:59
Ana
e-mail:
coresquinha@hotmail.com
I give a toss too
18.08.2005 05:58
Pam Traynor
e-mail:
pamela_traynor@hotmail.com
I dont give a toss
18.08.2005 15:41
ive read as much as i can about the shooting and i have to say i think they made a mistake but have to admire them for thinking right he might be a bomber so lets blow his head off in case.
he shouldnt have been here anyway and im happy to say i think he should have been shot for that alone and oh and his so called close family that he couldnt be bothered with that he had to sneak over here and get away from them are just seeing pound signs now and im very interested in the fact that there solicitor is fighting for money and turned down three offers so far and thats a fact from a student im putting up in my house at this very moment that lives in the same village as the parents.
if somebody hurts my family i go after them and the police are human and sometimes lose there tempers and im so glad there kicking ass
james rees
e-mail:
omen_55@msn.com
Double-speak immigration policy
19.08.2005 00:28
Successive governments have recognized that Britain needs migrants to come to work in Britain.That is the practical and real policy. But partly because of politicians' anxious looking over their shoulder at populist tabloid viewpoints and partly because of their need to appear to be conforming to EU rules, successive governments have not felt free to say so.
The big US corporations want cheap labour: hence the recent mass sackings at Gate Gourmet, Heathrow; hence the mere lip service paid by US Republicans to checking the entry of illegal Mexican migrants.
If the 'laws' of Milton Friedman say labour should be cheaper, and employers act according to those norms, and governments tacitly back up the employers, then that is the real policy of the UK, however much the words 'illegal immgrant' are wheeled out near election time to keep the Sun's readers primed.
It is no use for the Home Office now, knowing perfectly well what their own real, tacit 'policy'is, to turn round and talk when it suited them about the young Brazilian man's immigration status, while having acquiesced in the migration of thousands of young men like him, again when it suited them.
Canada has a more honest migration policy: about half a million visas are issued to migrants and the Canadian government openly admits that the country needs new migrants.
Mark Fenn
I still give a toss
19.08.2005 07:19
Pam Traynor
e-mail:
pamela_traynor@hotmail.com
Immigration into the UK
19.08.2005 13:27
'Discussion of the reported immigration status of the tragically killed young man from Brazil is a reminder of the double-speak immigration policy of the UK'
Discussion of all immigration matters show a degree of confusion greater than any other topic.
It has always struck me as an irony that traditionally the right are oppossed to immigration, whilst the left are pro-immigration, when if either group stopped and thought about immigration and what it means in a macro-economic sense, the positions would be reversed.
Capital needs immigration - big business needs immigration - partially to ensure that business is not subject to labour shortages which may give the working man or woman an opportunity to achieve a more equitable return from their labours, and partly to ensure the continued growth of the British economy, and the continued increase in wealth for the bourgeoisie.
Radical lefties who wish to see the capitalist state dismantled, need a continuing source of cheap labour like a fish needs a bicycle.
It does not follow that a reduction in immigration alone would lead to the collapse of the capitalist state, but it is true that conflict inherent in the system would be more readily exposed if there were a labour crisis.
Frank
Disgusted
19.08.2005 18:11
I have seen you Rehman and Khan, anrone can see you are loving it.You should be ashamed,but you won't.
ray harper
Not in my name
19.08.2005 19:13
Jean rest in peace, I pray for you and your family. To the police may god forgive you for your sins (murder, lies and fear).
patrick
Lets have some balance....
19.08.2005 20:19
Dr Glenn Smith
Fleeting identification
19.08.2005 23:51
Jean Charles paid with his life.
Others have paid with their freedom on the basis of such unreliable identification, one example is the hapless Barry George, convicted on the fleeting identification of one Susan Mayes.
Hopefully there will be some kind of justice for the family of Jean Charles.
Of course the real culprits are those behind 7/7, and poor Jean Charles is another victim of that inhuman act.
Mike. JfB.
Mike Bourke
e-mail:
mikebourke2@hotmail.com
Homepage:
http://www.barrygeorge.com
Balanced debate
21.08.2005 06:39
Pam Traynor
e-mail:
pamela_traynor@hotmail.com
Please leave the grieving family alone
22.08.2005 17:47
Regards,
Rich.
Rich
WHAT IF HE WAS YOUR SON?
22.08.2005 22:20
RICHARD GRANT
e-mail:
rickygeorgegrant@msn.com
Russ
23.08.2005 22:16
The police do not shoot people for the hell of it. At the time, there was a 'justifiable reason' for shooting this man (whether right or wrong) and therefore the officers involved are, and should always be, immune from prosecution and remain anonymous.
This man was, at the time, illegally resident in the UK.
He was in the company of people involved in terrorism upon this country.
He was, technically, innocent and detached from involvement with the London bombings.
Anti-terror procedures do infringe on civil liberties.
People of non-white 'looks' are more likely to be involved in terrorism.
I know this may offend many....I will not condone this shooting....I am not racist...I want to live in a safe country, and I am prepared to give up many personal liberties for this.
Russ
Neil Russell
Support for family
27.08.2005 04:57
Pam Traynor
e-mail:
pamela_traynor@hotmail.com
Everyone had a hand in lying!!
30.08.2005 11:34
Then I hear statements made from families of the victims saying that we shouldn't blame the police they were just doing their job and that those who died were MORE important! Jean Charles de Menezes was a innocent victim just like those of the 7th and should not gain any LESS recognition because he was gunned down by police in the line of duty instead of by bombers . And no amount of excuses given can replace the life of an innocent man!!
Adele Samuels
e-mail:
A.Samuels@wlv.ac.uk
reply to JAMES REES!!!!!!!!
28.09.2005 13:41
Amy