Kate Davies is the Chief Executive of the Notting Hill Housing Trust. Prior to this she was Chief Executive of Servite Housing Association. Previously, she was Director of Housing at Brighton & Hove City Council. This is what the record says. Yet there is a selectivity as to who gets housing as a priority within the organization. Discover her political affiliations as I did and this will make sense to understand her connections!
Her good friend was head of Notting Hill Housing Trust as an influential member of the Labour Party.
Remember the politics - housing is linked to votes, as others have reminded us.
Notice the people that receive priority and see that some get housed immediately whilst others are given slum conditions and treated like vermin. If anyone complains in writing, the tenants that have, quickly find a tenant from hell placed in the flat or house next to them.
Tenants are also suddenly informed by the management that they are in rent arrears. Which cannot be the truth as thier rent is being paid in full by the local authority. Anti-social aggressive behaviour from the management is reportedly used very frequently in an effort to try to goad the tenant that complained in writing into an argument. The newspaper article on this site just supports what too many tenants of the trust are saying.
Countless tenants of the trust are festering in bad conditions not fit to live in and put in rent arrears by the trust, arrears that could not exist. I am hearing more and more terrible stories from tenants that I speak to with the written evidence from the management that stinks as to how tenants are now being treated.
This is institutionalised as all the tenants are saying that these tactics are coming from the top of the management.
This means the Chairman and the Chief Executive. The other management are just following orders.
Kate Davies follows the policies of the Chairman and does not seem to answer any letters of complaint from what all the tenants are saying. Is it true she is getting paid £140,000 a year? What about the expenses and the perks? Many would do the job better on a voluntary basis to sort out the mess and bad management that is being politically directed as it is closely connected to the political party in government and their housing situation is being made worse not better.
The tenants are not listened to, letters are ignored and the management abuse them and treat them like shit.
If letters by the Opposition have been identified, why are the management - meaning Chairman and Chief Executive not doing anything? Because they want their political connections to be enhanced? What is it, a medal, a dameship a knighthood or a peerage?
Yes the organization of which Kate Davies is a member has been providing housing for vulnerable groups. That is what the organization has a duty to do. But does she answer letters from vulnerable tenants and does she deal with the abuse of tenants? Clearly not. Otherwise none of the tenants would be complaining of abuse by management and not listening to the complaints of their own tenants.
In the meantime, tenants suffer whilst the likes of the management promote themselves as being so charitable to others and getting paid huge wages for such charity.
Most people do not seek charity - they seek respect and what they are entitled to - proper housing in good condition that is fit to live in, provided by their registered social landlord which receives large amounts of government funding at a rent that is reasonable - no more - and no less.
mary brown
Her good friend was head of Notting Hill Housing Trust as an influential member of the Labour Party.
Remember the politics - housing is linked to votes, as others have reminded us.
Notice the people that receive priority and see that some get housed immediately whilst others are given slum conditions and treated like vermin. If anyone complains in writing, the tenants that have, quickly find a tenant from hell placed in the flat or house next to them.
Tenants are also suddenly informed by the management that they are in rent arrears. Which cannot be the truth as thier rent is being paid in full by the local authority. Anti-social aggressive behaviour from the management is reportedly used very frequently in an effort to try to goad the tenant that complained in writing into an argument. The newspaper article on this site just supports what too many tenants of the trust are saying.
Countless tenants of the trust are festering in bad conditions not fit to live in and put in rent arrears by the trust, arrears that could not exist. I am hearing more and more terrible stories from tenants that I speak to with the written evidence from the management that stinks as to how tenants are now being treated.
This is institutionalised as all the tenants are saying that these tactics are coming from the top of the management.
This means the Chairman and the Chief Executive. The other management are just following orders.
Kate Davies follows the policies of the Chairman and does not seem to answer any letters of complaint from what all the tenants are saying. Is it true she is getting paid £140,000 a year? What about the expenses and the perks? Many would do the job better on a voluntary basis to sort out the mess and bad management that is being politically directed as it is closely connected to the political party in government and their housing situation is being made worse not better.
The tenants are not listened to, letters are ignored and the management abuse them and treat them like shit.
If letters by the Opposition have been identified, why are the management - meaning Chairman and Chief Executive not doing anything? Because they want their political connections to be enhanced? What is it, a medal, a dameship a knighthood or a peerage?
Yes the organization of which Kate Davies is a member has been providing housing for vulnerable groups. That is what the organization has a duty to do. But does she answer letters from vulnerable tenants and does she deal with the abuse of tenants? Clearly not. Otherwise none of the tenants would be complaining of abuse by management and not listening to the complaints of their own tenants.
In the meantime, tenants suffer whilst the likes of the management promote themselves as being so charitable to others and getting paid huge wages for such charity.
Most people do not seek charity - they seek respect and what they are entitled to - proper housing in good condition that is fit to live in, provided by their registered social landlord which receives large amounts of government funding at a rent that is reasonable - no more - and no less.
mary brown
e-mail:
Comments
Hide the following 16 comments
Social Rachmanism
28.04.2005 13:15
Discriminated Tenant
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - MISMANAGEMENT
07.09.2005 11:45
Email:
Dear Ms Mary Brown,
I have emailed you already at 'Hotmail.com'; with my comments about your article Regarding 'Notting Hill Trust' and Mainly 'Kate Davies'.
I am unfortunately a Tenant with 'Servite Houses' where 'Kate Davies' was 'Chief Executive' till late 2004.
In August of 2004, 'The Housing Ombudsman', had to find 'Servite Houses' in Breech of thier own Tenancy agreement due to the Letters I produced from 'Kate Davies' that were proven by contractors reports to be bare faced Lies.
All you stated in your report, about being told one owed rent arrears I have had told to myself, albeit rent paid on time by Local authority, about complaining, then all Hell breaks loose.
Have you had any reports from others living under Servite Houses as thier Lanlords?
The Housing Ombudsman, ordered 'Servite Houses' to install new heating system in this House.
Servite Houses hired some DIY agents (Destroy It Yourself) from the 31st May 2005 -03rd june 2005 who said they had replaced the whole heating system
Yet today it still is not working! We have had leaks, our home is ruined!! And we are 100 times worse off now than before the new heating system installed.
I have wrote to the Prime Ministe, to Watchdog, to the audit commissioner, to Mori, and many more, but I am akin to a mouse running around on wheel, going no where!
Can you advise, I sent you photographs when I emailed you at Hotmail in attachment.
I thank you in anticipation of a reply,
Yours sincerely,
Sdenim
Susan Denim
e-mail:
sdeni@aol.com
Inocent untill proven guilty??? not at NOTTINGHILL HOUSING TRUST
02.04.2006 12:17
Ihave been at the mercy of this trust for 8yrs,cant get legal help,2 busy on imigration issues.
Kindly give me help,all people that have this problem, lets get together out side trust peacefully get media coverage bring all these people involved in trust to justice according the law not TRUST.
I had heart attack since becoming anenemy of trust,very poor health since, trust advised by GP,CONSULTANT,HEALTH WORKER, this man needs groung floor accomadation,ground floor flat vacant in my block became vacant,flat giving to retiring caretaker (council); trust they changed their way of emergency housing,twice in last 8yrs.
Rent owing (paid direct/housing benefit)
Aggression on my part(trust claims)
Drug dealing(r.bristow/trust came to my home told me of allegation/person whom made complaint(they hide behind data protection act) do they really understand DATA PROTECTION
I went 2 fulham police regarding her claim,police imform me her responce was I DIN'T MAKE IT OFICIAL,but she did by bringing it 2 my attention,this is the same person that took a bottle of champpayne from me at my home,it this a responsible person whom should be dealing with people in any way shape or form.
Had labour MP Coleman looking into this but ,he was part of the problem.
Now have conservative looking in to this.
Icould go on for ever but,if this trust get their way i will end up on the street thats how bad this is now.
Yours Faithfully
B.Lindsey
07944 920193
Barry Lindsey
e-mail:
b.lindsey@ukonline.co.uk
Draft Charities Bill
10.04.2006 01:32
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Bill.
The Guinness Trust is a 'registered social landlord' (RSL) as well as a registered charity. As a RSL the Trust is also regulated by the Housing Corporation.
My comments and the suggestions are brief and are as follows:
Social housing
1. I note that 'social housing' is not included as a charitable purpose but I imagine that the purposes listed at Part1, 2(2) should cover this activity. I wonder whether the Charity Commission will provide guidance on this activity?
Public benefits
2. I wonder whether the phrase "public benefit" test is best left undefined in the Bill? If so, will guidance be available from the Commission on what may demonstrate that adequate public benefit is derived from an activity for it to be a charitable purpose? I would certainly welcome guidance in due course.
Interest management by Charitable RSL's
3. As a developing RSL, the Guinness Trust takes out loans from banks and building societies to produce new or improved social housing. These loans may be at fixed or variable interest rates. Prudent management means that we try to manage our exposure to movements in interest rates. Although the Housing Corporation assesses whether a RSL has the systems and skills to enter into the financial instruments/interest rate hedging products, the Commission has its own process. This means there is double scrutiny.
In the case of RSL's would it be possible for the draft Bill to be amended to include provision for this scrutiny to be delegated to the Housing Corporation.
If you would like any further information on any of the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Alfons Dankis
Group Finance & Planning Director
Guinness Trust
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE OF HUMAN RIGHTS
17.04.2006 21:53
GERRYMANDERING OF THE VOTE?
NHHT SLEAZE 1
NHHT SLEAZE 2
NHHT SLEAZE + COUNCIL SLEAZE?
NHHT CANNOT BE TRUSTED
NHHT CANNOT BE TRUSTED
WHO CONTROLS WHOM?
ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
SLEAZE BY LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST MANAGEMENT ARE ABUSING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF ITS VULNERABLE TENANTS - IN BREACH OF TRUST
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
SLEAZE BY LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
earl
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
28.07.2006 12:30
FREEMASONRY...
FREEMASONRY...
FREEMASONRY...
FREEMASONRY...
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST abuse continues...
carlton
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST abuse
06.08.2006 13:23
TONY BLAIR RECENTLY VISITED NHHT - ALL TO GIVE SPIN, PR AND LIES?
carlton
Roman, what do you think about all of this?
18.02.2007 21:35
Do not support those who do not listen to your complaints, just impose
Has it got anything to do with the fact that they do not consult, they just impose. Well what a surprise, that's what the labour party controlled Notting Hill Housing Trust do.
limon
Notting Hill Housing Trust tend invariably to confront good tenants
21.02.2007 13:37
ELECTIONS – HOUSING
TOP OF ELECTORAL AGENDA – 3 MAY 2007 - ELECTIONS [SCOTLAND, WALES, ENGLAND]
SOCIAL HOUSING – COUNCIL HOMES – HOUSING ASSOCIATION HOMES
BLAIR LABOUR COUNCILS ARE SETTING UP: “ARM’S LENGTH MANAGEMENT ORGANISATIONS” [ALMOs] WITHOUT A BALLOT
UNACCOUNTABILITY – UNDEMOCRATIC – UNTRANSPARENT
RUTH KELLY [Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) – Department of Communities & Local Government (DCLG)] LEAKED A REPORT [DENIED BY HER, OF COURSE!] usually a sign that it will be part of policy and part of the softening-up process – THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO:
END SECURE LIFELONG TENANCY [MEANS EVICTING TENANTS].
END RENT CEILINGS [MEANS MASSIVE INCREASE IN RENTS]
A further step is to means test council housing, whereby tenants earning over a certain level will lose their homes.
BLAIR’S PRIVATISATION OF 3 MILLION COUNCIL HOMES!!!
PLANNED PRIVATISATION MEANS PROPERTIES ARE NOT S- SECURE
NOT A- AFFORDABLE
NOT A- ACCOUNTABLE
NOT D- DECENT
MORE MONEY IS SPENT ON THE NHS RELATING TO BAD HEALTH LINKED TO BAD EFFECTS OF SOCIAL HOUSING THAN ALL THE MONEY SPENT TO ALLEVIATE THE BAD EFFECTS OF SMOKING!
[Prof. Peter Ambrose, Prof. Housing Studies Health & Social Policy, Brighton University]
BE VIGILANT
BE ON GUARD
LABOUR IS: DESTROYING OUR SECURITY – VOTE 3 MAY 2007
DESTROYING OUR HOMES –
DESTROYING US - VOTE 3 MAY 2007
TAX TAKE 1997: £69 BILLION – TAX TAKE 2007: £146BILLION (£146,000,000,000)
elroy
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - BET ON THEM? JOKER ARE YOU?
21.02.2007 18:11
Who is getting Council properties under Blair policy?
Labour are going to lose big time for elections on 3 MAY 2007
SNP will win in Scotland - don't bother Tony
The more Mr Blair goes to Scotland the more votes will go to SNP. Funny really...
mark
Blair the betrayer - everything has been sold off - deceived us - lied to us
21.02.2007 21:57
Betraying BLair in getting rid of our homes - the LIE - another BIG LIE
Blair betrayal in selling off our homes from under our feet
Discredited Blair who betrayed us with his lies and deceit
Our north sea oil has been frittered away.
Our pensions have been spent on a war.
Too many inocent people have been killed.
Innocent blood on his hands.
kingston
NOTTING HILL MARKET RENT LIMITED - £1,000 - £20,000,000 + WHATEVER NEXT...
17.03.2007 18:25
BIGGEST LABOUR POLITICAL HOUSING 'SCAM' IN THE UK ORCHESTRATED BY TONY B.LIAR?
PURE PROFIT - PURE GREED
The story of how champagne socialists like Labour Party member Kate Davies (29/3/56) of Flat 2 (first floor), Corner Lodge, Radnor Place, 107 Sussex Gardens, Paddington, City of Westminster, London W2 2RU, 'the friend' of Labour Lord Tom Sawyer (12/5/43) of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford SE6 2NE and Gerard Anthony Lemos (26/2/58) of 7 Bisham Gardens, Highgate Hill, London N6 6DJ who has corrupted a generation of Labour Party members through the nepotism/cronyism of one sole person in return for 'favours'?
Many colleagues describe Ms Davies as vain, arrogant, dictatorial, insincere, intolerant, imperious, not willing to respond to letters of complaint in writing, particularly if they are from vulnerable people, with pronounced Trotskyist totalitarian tendencies, not unlike Gerard Lemos who ran away (without Paul Crane) to China, with his little Red Book under his arm in order to promote his dysfunctional 'social engineering' plans which he was to put into practice with funding from Tom Sawyer as chairman at NHHT in the Ward of Colville in the Borough of Kensington & Chelsea BUT in the parliamentary constituency of Kensington & Regent's Park (the Labour MP's constituency of Karen Buck).
The discredited 'social engineering' plan was applied but devised by the evil Nazi Adolf Eichmann. He was a bigot and evil tyrant. It is worse, far worse when you are Jewish.
This was perpetrated against us tenants deliberately by Ms Kate Davies.
Wake up JEWS in the UK - the Labour Party are now targeting you, me and us ALL!!!
Kate Davies is the anti semitic tyrant!!!
The black cadres in the Labour Party are apologising for slavery (we want compensation) - apologising for the confrontational behaviour of Kate Davies - NO!!
Kate Davies knows exactly what she is doing - she must pay compensation to me and to all the others who have suffered at her evil hands.
No more supression of the truth Indymedia.
The TRUTH must out...
ELECTIONS ON 3 MAY 2007 in Scotland, Wales and England
LABOUR PARTY controls Notting Hill Housing Trust (NHHT)
Labour Party prime minister Mr Blair indirectly controls NHHT
All Board members of NHHT are members of the Labour Party
The totalitarian state has arrived...
Labour Central government directives [Blair, Prescott, Kelly, ODPM/DCLG]
Labour Local government management [LBHF Housing Department - independence is compromised][Company of 'H+F Homes Limited' (LBHF) links directly into NHHT]
Vulnerable Tenants [Abuse of Housing Benefit and property rental income at industrial level to fuel a silent but extremely lucrative property and housing industry - is not the 'charity' (21 charity shops) a convenient charade to avoid tax? Corruption at its most corrupt? Abuse at its apogee?]
Suspension/Inhibitions
Generation of so frequent (to constitute harassment - far more than annual) Gas Safety Checks [as an excuse to visit a secured/assured tenants property, who holds valuable security of tenure]
Concocted 'Rent Arrears' accounts to vulnerable tenants
Deceit?
Corruption?
Complete commercialisation of a charity.
Notting Hill Market Rent Limited (27/2/2006) from £1,000 to £20,000,000,000 shares - not yet issued.
Is this done in order to transfer the champagne socialists at NHHT into unaccountable multi millionaires - all out of unaccountable taxpayers money???
peter
NOTTING HILL [ROTTING HELL] HOUSING [DIS]TRUST
31.03.2007 22:59
It is sinking in a morass of spin and sleaze - most people call them LIES with a capital 'L' !
LABOUR is going into MELTDOWN - but those in the BLAIR bunker are fools!
They do not consult the good intelligent respectable tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - no - they are such fools, would rather drown in their own vomit and filth!
Most of the intelligent, good and respectable tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are well aware that the discredited champion of spin & sleaze [lies & deceit?] at Notting Hill Housing Trust is "our dear leader" the elective dictator Mr Blair [Mr B.liar?] who indirectly controls Notting Hill Housing Trust.
But, Blair's days are numbered. Blair is a weak vacillating coward and bully.
His performance over Iran has shown him for what he is - a fool.
He uses the wrong arguments - he attacks the wrong people!
Blair is thus finished.
Blair will retire to ignominy.
Blair betrayed Britain.
Blair betrayed the British people - all of them!
As to Notting Hill Housing Trust - the 'secret' industry that utilises the poor and most vulnerable at industrial level to fuel a silent and extremely lucrative housing & property industry.
Is not 'the charity' a convenient charade to avoid paying tax?
Transfer the properties from charity to a commercial internal entity.
Just days ago, Ms Kate Davies (29/3/56) with other friends on the board of directors of Notting Hill Housing Trust set up 'Notting Hill Market Rent Limited' (9/2/2007) from £1,000 to £20,000,000 shares. Is this a case of pure profit - pure greed? Was this not unlawful? Was this not a breach of trust? But, Notting Hill Housing Trust is meant to be a charitable Trust?
It is not meant to mix commercial money with charity money? What unlawful game is Ms Davies playing with money held in trust? All directors are personally liable? This breach of trust is it not worse than the unlawful activities of Peter Rachman of the area of Notting Hill, west London, out of which Notting Hill Housing Trust started 40 years ago, due to the unlawful abuse of tenants of west London? Is it the case that Notting Hill Housing Trust has now been corrupted? Spin and sleaze, lies and deceit, corruption, breach of trust, unacceptable and unlawful behaviour?
The directors/trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust are all members of the Labour Party.
The chairman [Alan Cole] is a member of the Labour Party.
The chief executive [Kate Davies] is a member of the Labour Party. She was a special adviser of the Labour Party. What advice could she give? Her only main qualification is a degree in sociology. What use could that have been to the Labour Party? Was that how the 'social engineering' policies that were previously dreamed up by the evil mind of Adolf Eichmann, the evil Jew-hater were dreamed up and now used [with a slight twist - like the twisted minds that thought up this hate] to 'good effect' by Gerard Lemos and Ms Kate Davies? Many of her colleagues describe her as vain and arrogant. They describe her cold steel blue eyes without an ounce of compassion or humanity in them. Why? They describe her long blonde hair like some German Gauleiter madchen who appears, from what has been described about her by her colleagues, that she detests anyone who is Jewish or is gay. Is that true? If so, Ms Davies should resign with immediate effect. Is it true that Ms Davies has been putting in place Labour Party 'social engineering' policies? Were such Labour Party policies not researched in the Colville Labour Ward of north Kensington in the north of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [represented by the Labour MP for north Kensington & Regent's Park, Karen Buck] by Gerard Lemos [ex Commissioner of the Civil Service, ex Commissioner of the Audit Commission, ex Deputy Chairman of the British Council to Chairman Lord Neil Kinnock, ex Government Race Adviser - the way to 'stitch-up' people good and proper - no Freedom of Speech in Blair's Britain - always use the so-called 'Racist' excuse in order for the Labour Party to attack a member of the Labour Party who is an old age pensioner, Gunther Gross was to discover!], the ex chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust, Gerard Lemos was the protege of Labour Lord Tom Sawyer? Did not Ms Kate Davies not describe such policies as: "good seeds sown by Gerard Lemos"?
As special adviser of the Labour Party, is that why the promotion of Ms Davies in any housing association was so unbelievably rapid. Not knowledge - but political patronage and nepotism. That is where Labour Lord Tom Sawyer (12/5/43) of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, London SE6 2NE comes in [the ex chairman of the Labour Party and ex head of UNISON Union, ex National Union of Public Employees - did he not 'stitch-up' all the Union members in the priority to support Tony Blair at ALL costs?]. Labour Lord Tom Sawyer, did he not support the application of Ms Kate Davies [partner of Nick Johnson (Davies Johnson Limited - is it not a 'shell' company? incorporated on 27/2/2006)] to be chief executive at Notting Hill Housing Trust when his good friend, the then chief executive Labour Party member Peter Redman was discredited - whereupon, was he not paid a secret payment out of Notting HIll Housing Trust funds? Hundreds and hundreds of millions of pounds of unaccountable taxpayers money?
Is it not true that there was no investigation by the Labour Party member Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and was Ken Macdonald [who had no experience in prosecution work?] not appointed by Tony Blair as the senior partner of Matrix Chambers in Gray's Inn, where Cherie Booth/Blair works? Was he not appointed on the recommendation of Cherie Booth/Blair? Is it not true that pillow-talk works wonders - especially when Cherie Booth/Blair makes the recommendation/s for high office?
Is it not true that the legal system in England and Wales is totally compromised?
Is it not true that Charles ['Fatty'] Falconer was appointed to the most senior legal office of Lord Chancellor by Tony Blair in order to replace Derry Irvine [the man who was Labour Party Lord Chancellor and who was responsible for dictating to Peter 'Mandy' Mandelson as they crossed Parliament Square after John Smith's funeral at Westminster Abbey that Tony Blair was going to be the Leader of the Labour Party and Peter, Alastair and Jonathan thought that Derry needed to be brought down 'to reality' - as he likened himself to Henry VIII's Cardinal Wolsey - my friend spoke to him after the argument and Derry was embarassed to speak to him and only wanted to 'scuttle away' - what a difference to when we last met him and spoke with him!] after a heated argument between Blair and Irvine - his ex pupil master? Boy Blair?
Is it not the case that Charles Falconer was Tony Blair's ex flatmate? - talk about nepotism and cronyism!
Yet, Charlie Falconer knows that his days are numbered... there is some real bad blood in the Cabinet now. Isn't there?
John Reid PhD, the scotsman, has his ideas... Charles Falconer, BA, has his...
Jonathan Powell, chief of staff to Tony Blair, lives conveniently very close to Notting Hill Housing Trust, based at Hammersmith Grove, Hammersmith, London W6. Tony Blair's 'secret' unaccountable housing and property industry.
Is it not the case that Notting Hill Housing [Trust/Group/Home Ownership/Care Services/Market Rent Limited/etc.?] can avoid paying tax by transferring its very valuable properties from a charity to a commercial organisation.
The Solicitors used by Notting Hill Housing Trust are 'Devonshires' of Salisbury House, London Wall, London EC2M 5QY [Tel: 020-7628-7576].
But is it not the case that Notting Hill Housing Trust resort to the use of the Labour Party solicitors of choice of 'Glazer Delmar' solicitors of Peckham in London SE 15.
Why, use such a firm of solicitors in Peckham, London WSE15 when Notting Hill Housing Trust is based in London W6?
Is it not the case that the partners of Glazer Delmar were Michael Glazer, Barbara Delmar and Sally Powell (who specialised in Wills and residential conveyancing)? All solicitors! But, is it not the case that Sally Powell is a Labour Party Councillor of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham? Is it not the case that Glazer Delmar of Peckham supports the Labour Party?
Is it not the case that all tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are advised to instruct Glazer Delmar solicitors? But is it not the case that Notting Hill Housing Trust also instruct Glazer Delmar solicitors? But this is a fundamental breach of the professional rules of conduct of solicitors? Is it not a blatant breach of the strict inflexible legal rule that must be followed by ALL practising solicitors - namely, NOT to allow a CONFLICT OF INTEREST to arise?
So, what kind of firm of solicitors firm is Glazer Delmar of [223-229 Rye Lane] Peckham, London SE15 4TZ [Tel: 020-7639-8801]?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell is a leading member of the Labour Party?
Is it not the case that the partner of Sally Powell is Iain Coleman - ex Labour MP for Hammersmith & Fulham?
Was Iain Coleman not removed by the election of Conservative Party MP Greg Hands - with huge help from angry, unlawfully abused good and respectable tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust - who have been treated with absolute contempt by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust under the [out of lawful] control [which has been identified as "not fit for purpose" Labour Party wrecks who seek to confront and harass not to consult and inform with respect. [After 38 (thirty eight) years that the Labour Party totally controlled the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham and it was such a safe borough it was referred to by the Labour Party as the 'flagship' borough! But now arrogance, dictatorship, vanity, cowardice, confrontatioin and harassment has led to Human Rights abuses of good tenants.
Indeed, it appears that matters have got so bad by what appears as the out-of-control chief executive who appears to be acting unlawfully that good respectable tenants are now taking the abusive out of lawful control senior management who will not listen, consult or treat the good tenants with respect that many tenants have gone to court.
The good tenants have asserted if the management were intelligent and wise they would have appointed the intelligent tenants to the board or sorted matters out reasonably.
However, the directors appear to be extremely foolish and seem to want a massive confrontation against good respectable tenants and seem to relish the possibility of massive adverse publicity and it appears the directors seem to relish the prospect of resorting to unlawful behaviour?
Why do the directors not apologise and give the good respectable tenants decent flats - not tiny spaces, fit for a mouse, with flats in massive unlawful disrepair?
If the chief executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust, Ms Kate Davies, not living at palatial surroundings in a luxurious mansion building close to the Edgware Road by Marble Arch at Flat 2, Corner Lodge, 107 Sussex Gardens, London W2 2RU, some 500 yeards from Connaught Square [west side], to where Tony Blair is moving after the major local elections on 3 May 2007?
BUT good respectable tenants were they not treated en bloc with total disrespect, absolute abuse, unacceptable confrontation and unlawful Harassment [Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Breaches of Human Rights] by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell is a leading member of the Labour Party National Executive Committee (NEC) of the Labour Party that controls the Labour Party?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell was made a Labour Party 'Dame' by Tony Blair [for her 'services' to Housing and 'ancillary services']?
Is it not the case that Sally Powell is a leading Councillor of the Labour Party and of the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham?
Urgent Questions need to be answered immediately...
concerned tenant
concerned tenant
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - ABUSE OF TRUST - BREACH OF CONFIDENCE - HARASSMENT
08.04.2007 14:15
If the Trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust were wise, they would appoint to the board of Trustees some of the most responsible and intelligent tenant beneficiaries of the charitable trust to advise the board of trustees - but they are not, they will not.
The board of trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust - a tentacle [is it the lucrative carbuncle that is there but not meant to be seen for what it is - the industrial means to exploit the most vulnerable tenant beneficiaries through the agencies of housing benefit twinned to the funding conduit of the local authority through unaccountable access to unaccountable taxpayers money siphoned from central government - ODPM/DCLG - Housing Corporation QUANGO oversees for the Labour Party Executive but not for Parliament - Audit Commission QUANGO oversees for the Labour Party Executive but not for Parliament - in addition to through what was the unaccountable Labour Party controlled 'Hammersmith and Fulham Homes Limited' which links into the unaccountable Labour Party controlled Notting Hill Housing Trust?] of the Labour Party.
The Labour Party deceit is all done in order to gerrymander the votes of communities - All in a deceitful way to try to 'stitch-up' the vote!
For the Labour Party Trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust to confront and not to consult indicates that the Labour Party Trustees on the Board of Trustees of Notting Hill Housing Trust are all fools.
It further indicates that the Trustees are acting recklessly.
What is more, it indicates that the Board of Trustees are all acting unlawfully as Trustees of a charitable Trust.
The very same attitude is deployed by the Labour Party.
It and they are tired, it and they have served their time, it is now the Party of yesterday!
The Labour Party has corrupted us, betrayed us and deceived us all!
The Labour Party members ignore their legal responsibilities and would rather unlawfully confront and harass good tenant beneficiaries of a Trust, rather than listen and genuinely consult all tenant beneficiaries in good faith.
There is no good faith in all the actions of Trustees and senior management of Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Just as the good respectable tenant beneficiaries have been continually harassed since the chairmanship of ex Labour Party chairman, Labour Party Lord Tom Sawyer who was given a peerage by Tony Blair and then nominated to be chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust in 1998. When Lord Tom Sawyer of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford, south east London was discredited, he was replaced by his well groomed Labour Party friend and Labour Party member, Gerard Lemos of 7 Bisham Gardens, Highgate, north London, who he oversaw to be made Deputy Chairman of the British Council under Labour Party Lord Neil 'Kinnochio' Kinnock, the chairman of the British Council. Government Race Adviser, Commisioner of the Civil Service and Commissioner of the Audit Commission - so that Lord Tom Sawyer would not be embarassed on his hurried and untimely departure from the chairmanship of Notting Hill Housing Trust when over 45 Trust properties [those that were known about] of the 19,000 properties comprised in the housing stock that were misappropriated.
Under the present chairman of the lacklustre poor leadership of Alan Cole - a Labour Party member the chief executive continues her unlawful harassment of the most vulnerable tenants in order to seek vacant possession of valuable properties forming part of the nineteen thousand properties that form part of perhaps the biggest housing stock located in west London and has automatic acces to unaccountable taxpayers money without any questiones asked - all funnelled from unaccountable QUANGO's.
All deviously clever!
Mr Blair will retire to 29 Connaught Square and 5 Archery Close, north east of Hyde Park, west of the Edgware Road by Marble Arch in the City of Westminster.
Mr Blair may indeed install many CCTV, panic alarms and motion sensors as part of his 24 hour protection arrangements but the feng shui is bad and Mr Blair has no idea of its negative symbolism.
John Smith
NOTTING HILL HOUSING - LABOUR PARTY GERRYMANDERING SCAM...
28.07.2008 16:46
BUT LABOUR PARTY IS FINISHED...SO IS THE CRIMINAL LABOUR PARTY HOUSING ASSOCIATION REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD "MARKET" IN BRITAIN...
IT IS LABOUR PARTY EXPLOITATION BY EVIL LABOUR PARTY CRIMINALS BASED AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING 1 BUTTERWICK, REAR OF METRO BUILDING, HAMMERSMITH W6 8DL. Next to L'OREAL BUILDING, by PICCADILLY LINE UNDERGROUND STATION...
GORDON BROWN & HIS PALS ARE WAY OUT OF TOUCH...
THAT IS WHY HE WILL LOSE THE NEXT ELECTION...
WE WILL SEE TO IT - THEY CONFRONT & HARASS THE MOST VULNERABLE & DISABLED OF TENANTS.
ruth
NOTTING HILL HOUSING ARE CRIMINALS - EVIL WICKED CRIMINALS
27.08.2008 14:11
It is run by a bunch of lacklustre non principled LABOUR PARTY scum who do nothing but undermine good tenant relations and set one tenant against another tenant who complains of legitimate complaints for non repair of Notting Hill Housing properties that are left to deteriorate in total disrepair with rats, mice, cockroaches, insects and vermin infestation.
There are over 761 formal complaints of housing disrepair and harassment lodged by responsible respectable tenants of Notting Hill Housing against the bastards of the LABOUR PARTY at Notting Hill Housing that supposedly "run" the shambles that is Notting Hill Housing.
It is managed - not run - abysmally - as those who are meant to do basic repairs under the command of the useless management do nothing. The overpaid unaccountable management just preen themselves with vain arrogance claiming vast expenses and do absolutely NOTHING but enjoying themselves - all LABOUR PARTY Stasi puppets!
The CRIMINALS and scum in society.
They should all be put against a wall and finished off!
Just as the days of the LABOUR PARTY and its Special Advisers at Notting Hill Housing are numbered!
Mohammed