London Indymedia

September 11th video evidence of missile.

Zinfandel | 23.05.2004 21:12 | Analysis | Globalisation | Repression | London

New video evidence archived at the LA Times substantiates missile claim

This latest video evidence brings the total number of independent clips showing the impact of the second plane to hit the World Trade Centre to six. Each one depicts what appears to be the launch of a missile a fraction of a second before impact.

This video can be seen on 'commemorative 911' DVDs and videos which are available everywhere.

The repercussions of this evidence could be incalculable and it is clearly being taken very seriously by government agencies in the US and UK (including the CIA and MI5) as well as elsewhere (as is illustrated by the WHOIS IP site log).

 http://www.letsroll911.org

 http://www.empirewatch.org/pages/_archives/articles/contributed/008/index.html

Oh, and for anybody that thinks this is all the work of a few sad, lonely conspiracy theorists, you might like to read 'The New Pearl Harbor' by Professor David Ray Griffin:

 http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1844370364/026-2790311-0542024

The mainstream media have completely ignored the claims that there was much more involvement by US authorities than mere incompetence and scoff at any such suggestion. Channel 5's recent 'documentary' piss take on the top ten conspiracy theories didn't even mention it, yet any Google search (their research tool!) will reveal that there are about 555,000 web pages which mention it - compared to the 361,000 of JFK which was second in their top ten to mind control (which had only 70,700). Indeed, the programmes presenter, Daniel Abineri, told me himself that there was no waty that Channel 5 would even mention September 11th.

Zinfandel
- Homepage: http://www.letsroll911.org

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

the video

23.05.2004 21:36

looking at the video, the flash of orange seen comes clearly from the nose of the aircraft as it strikes the building - not from any 'missile pod'.

sceptic


Clips from other angles prove it is not the impact of the nose.

23.05.2004 22:06

World Trade Centre flash 1
World Trade Centre flash 1

World Trade Centre flash 2
World Trade Centre flash 2

I should have also mentioned the odd appendage below the fuselage which to me, as a former aircraft mechanic, looks like a drop tank. But as far as I know civil aircraft have never been fitted with drop tanks.

Yes, I take your point about the orange flash on one clip, it isn't very clear. If it isn't a missile, can you explain it?

The other clips show it from a different angle and it is not from the tip of the nose. See below (top)

However, the .gif sequence below (bottom) is clearly not on impact. Neither does it come from a 'conspiracy website'. It is presently on the LA Times site at:

 http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2001-09/635083.gif


Zinfandel


So?

24.05.2004 07:29

Does it matter?

I mean maybe there was some US involvement, maybe not, as far as i can see all this is just speculation.

Al quaeda and the arab bourgeois backers would be just as capable of massacring thousands of people as the US and UK govts. I don't see how putting out relatively unsubstantiated conspiracy theories is helping anyone, its not who is in power thats the problem, its the fact that someone is in power, the very existence of the state and ruling class thats the problem.

I mean does it really make any difference whether the 'arab' bourgeoisie or the 'western' bourgeoisie killed those three thousand people, i don't think so.

leftie


Of course it matters!

24.05.2004 10:07

This 'terrorist attack' was used as the pretext for two wars which involved the slaying of tens of thousands of innocent Afghan and Iraqi people. And it isn't just the conspiracy theorists, as you so disparagingly term people who are trying to expose the truth. Nice that you can sit there casually dismissing everything without ever considering the evidence. This missile clip is, as far as I can gather, just the very tip of an enormous iceberg of evidence. As well as the New Pearl Harbor, you should check out the War on Freedom by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed. Also the families action group www.911forthetruth.org and www.deceptiondollar.com. I think that you will find that this isn't just a few paranoid conspiracy theorists but a swelling movement. There have been two conferences, one in San Francisco and one in Toronto. It is typical of 'lefties' like you to be so dismissive because you have been programmed to see everything as an anti-Semitic plot, an accusation made by the SWP of any suggestions that 9-11 was anything other than what the mass media claimed. Having delved into this reasonably deeply, I haven't seen any evidence which suggests that there was any direct involvement and any suggestion of anything remotely anti-Semitic. The Empire Watch site listed has an excellent list of symptoms of fascism - hit fascism on the left (so true!), then there is are two options - difficult to divorce the US or UK from these statements.

Edward Abbey


Hey, get your smears straight people!

24.05.2004 12:05

"It is typical of 'lefties' like you to be so dismissive because you have been programmed to see everything as an anti-Semitic plot"

But wait a minute? I thought that us "lefties" were all supposed to BE anti-semitic 'cos we oppose the slaughter of unarmed Palestinian kids, or something.

Make your minds up, people.

confused 'leftie'


the devil

24.05.2004 12:47

is in the detail ...

... but the big picture is still eerily reminicent of a reichstag fire ...

... and what about that detail?

Seems like one piece of 'evidence' contradicts the next bit!

Classic disinfomation campaign - in the spook trade, when unfavourable info is circulating, a favourite ploy is to release accurate info within inaccurate scenarios.

Thus in this 'limited hangout' - to use the tradespeak - we see attempts made to confuse and conflate info obtained via independant investigation with false or contradictory eveidence that reaches the same conclusions but entraps the theorist into being indentified with theories later contradicted.

The very least we can know about this event is the same scum made the money (market manipulations, weapons weapons and more weapons + all the political benefits of having a scared and plient population).

If there are lefties, righties or centralies out there who think that either the detail is unimportant or that a final 'proof' one way or th eother will emerge - they are out of their minds!

Does it require overwhelming evidence to act?

Does it have to be you and yours affected before armchairs are abandoned and pontificating is replaced with determined (and very probably dangerous) action?

Sheep are easily rounded up its the herd instinct.

But then again, barricades are notoriously dangerous for heads above them!

jackslucid
mail e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com


what a crock 'o' shite

24.05.2004 13:25

its like theeres no stoping the yanks, fuck me do thet really believe that was a missle..ehem....sorry missile?
yeah the US government would spend billions on the worlds biggest conspiracy and then skimp at the last minute by welding a missle pod to the fuckin underneath of the plane, which wouldnt cause the light you can see in the clip, because these missle's dont go off on impact??
youd better get it darn ya now, that theres no conspiracy to start wars for oil.
i like the feel of this radical lefty thing, but you'll stand a snowballs chance against the man...too many contradictions
too many idiot teenage socialists.

viscount missleroy


re:crock of shit

24.05.2004 23:00

Well, if someone who can barely string a sentence together is not convinced then, fuck it... I must concur.

hoob


PNAC - Rebuilding America's Defences

25.05.2004 12:02

May I respectfully suggest that all those who scoff at the idea that the September 11th 'attacks' could have been an inside job, take a look at the enclosed document from The Project For The New American Century entitled 'Rebuilding Americas Defences' which expresses the 'need' for a new Pearl Harbor.

Zinfandel


Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

London Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

London IMC

Desktop

About | Contact
Mission Statement
Editorial Guidelines
Publish | Help

Search :