Skip to content or view screen version

By-elections, broken promises and direct democracy

iniref | 28.08.2012 16:28 | Liverpool | Sheffield

For those seeking creative social change we propose that effective citizen-led governance, direct democracy, should be introduced for local and central politics. New legislation at Westminster will be needed -- a broad, strong movement could force the weakened coalition government to offer reform.

By-elections are coming up --- Manchester Central in November 2012 and Corby, maybe also in November.

Direct democracy DD supporters can use by-elections to prepare and rehearse our campaign for future elections.

How?

Demand (or try politely asking) politician-candidates for election to our Parliament that they should support our proposals for reform of our antique democracy. See also our election tactics for DD presented at  http://www.iniref.org/carta.htm

For instance, ask them to introduce and support a new law-proposal :::

THE DEMOCRACY BILL
This Bill will set out principles of democracy as rule-by-the-people and provide regulations for new instruments of citizen-led, issue-based democracy including:
Citizens' initiative which may be a law proposal and can lead to binding ballot of the electorate,
Veto referendum with which the electorate can block an unwanted government law or policy,
Recall -- sacking by the electorate -- of elected officials such as MPs.

BROKEN PROMISES
"We will give residents the power to instigate local referendums on any local issue." Con/Libdem Coalition agreement HM Government UK 2010. This item was thrown out of the Localism Bill by Liberal Democrat (!) peers in cahoots with lobbyists such as local government associations and large building companies. So, the prospects for local democracy with this government look bleak.

David Cameron promised that if elected he would introduce citizen-initiated referendum both at local and national levels. In government the coalition allows us to petition parliament by collecting thousands of signatures. We have enjoyed the right to petition parliament for hundreds of years so we gain little. No citizens' right to demand and obtain a national referendum is foreseen.
-----------------------------
Recent governments were elected on promises to reform our democratic system but they have failed to keep their promises.

We demand that they must do better in future! We must press politicians to keep their word; obtain from them new guarantees for early reform.

I&R ~ GB Citizens' Initiative and Referendum
Campaign for direct democracy in Britain
 http://www.iniref.org/




iniref
- e-mail: info@iniref.org
- Homepage: http://www.iniref.org/

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

I need just one more drink to sober me up!

28.08.2012 17:50

The state holds the monopoly on violence in society, so the state is logically in charge and no one is physically capable of holding them to account. They have all the weapons, control the single monopoly money system and the media. If the state backs Cameron, Cameron stays until the state backs someone else. On the other hand, privet business, if there is such a thing, is held to account by their customers every time they shop, or don't shop in their stores. These people are acutely concerned about what their customers think. Even the mighty Mcdonolds yields to left wing campaigners, when the state won't. They really don't want to piss of their customers.  http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/07/18/539881/mcdonalds-olympics-tax-break/
The only problem arrises when they start using the state for protection (protectonism). Without a gangster/state monopoly in the initiation of force, their can be no protectionism
To suggest a new kind on political system to control the uncontrollable state military industrial complex is like saying "I need just one more drink to sober be up!" The only route to peaceful solutions unknown can be to stop using political force and start using free individual choice to shape the future.

My rights extend to where your rights begin; the only law that is ever needed, enforced by everyone, equally.

anarchist


I need just one more drink to sober me up! — anarchist

29.08.2012 11:49

You are wrong in thinking that the state and politics cannot be influenced or vetoed by the people.

Last year Italian citizens were able to vote in binding referendum ballots on four issues:
public services;
preventing privatisation of water supplies;
banning nuclear power plants;
removing judicial immunity from politicians and officials.

These proposals were forced onto the ballot by citizens' initiatives and action.

Within six months, half a million endorsements must be collected in order that the proposal goes to abrogative referendum (to cancel existing law).

The water proposal attracted over a million endorsements, the anti-nuclear proposal 700,000 plus.

IN UK AND ENGLAND THIS RIGHT TO DEMOCRACY IS DENIED TO THE PEOPLE

Half a million people demonstrated against going to war in Iraq. With "I and R" direct democracy the british electorate could have stopped the troops.

iniref
mail e-mail: info@iniref.org
- Homepage: http://iniref.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/campaign-aims-power-to-the-people-essential-principles-of-governance-outlined/