>> This is the side of the story they won't show on the BBC.
It isn't a story

>> People are saying the police let them trash the place a bit for the media, they had the riot squads waiting in vans just around the corner, but waited for the press to get their pictures before they deployed them.
So what you are saying is that the police should of been deployed sooner so that the the place wasn't trashed so much? Just who's side are you on exactly?

>> The police succeeded in giving the protests a violent image in the media, to justify heavy handed tactics in the next protest. The media's vilification and twisted portrayals of these protests has been scandalous.
The protestors were violent if left to their own devices. Hence the police are needed to keep some order. No police = a lot of disorder and trashing of the place and violence.

"The protestors were violent if left to their own devices. Hence the police are needed to keep some order. No police = a lot of disorder and trashing of the place and violence."

Who's side are you on you cop loving idiot. ACAB!

N30 police van stunt. This is engineered blatantly PR policing,

Stencil your comments are doubledged & you seem to agree to with underclass,

All underclass is saying is we need to keep our heads switched on& when theres a obvious media sting avoid it & or uncover the facts.

No one is saying be a "good boy", just lets be organised & use self defence appropriately, ie with your head screwed on.