Skip to content or view screen version

(G20) Met Police to pay compensation after illegal raid.

Copwatch | 23.03.2010 10:54 | Repression | Social Struggles | Terror War

Met Police raid 'over the top, unnecessary and disproportionate'.

This is a repost from Channel 4 News. I have been searching for more news on this story, but the other mainstream media seem to be ignoring it.

Can anyone involved add more details please?


 http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/met+police+to+pay+g20+protest+compensation/3587057

Met police to pay G20 protest compensation

By Channel 4 News

Updated on 22 March 2010

The Metropolitan Police are facing a compensation bill of £250,000, after admitting a raid on a climate change group the day after the G20 protests in London last April was illegal.

Police burst into the Convergence Centre in east London carrying taser guns, and handcuffed protesters face down.

The Met Commissioner admitted it was unlawful to arrest, search them, and force them to be recorded on film, but he refused to apologise to the protestors.

This was the day after the big city G20 demonstrations. A large convoy and a heavy handed police presence took up positions around a disused office block.

Senior officers claimed intelligence had picked out some of the more violent protestors who overnight had used the building as a squat.

As police burst in, the majority of the 70 demonstrators simply sat down. There was no resistance.

One person was caught behind a door and threatened. Another officer trained a 50,000 volt taser weapon on the group sitting down. They had come prepared for trouble but there was none.

Today the Metropolitan Police Commissioner agreed to pay £3,000 compensation each to two of those demonstrators and admitted the operation was unlawful because there were no reasonable grounds for suspicion.

Stephen Grosz, the claimants' lawyer, told Channel 4 News: "We did ask for an apology (from the commissioner), we asked first of all for a public apology to be made to all those who had been arrested. That was turned down.

"We then asked whether we could have a private apology addressed to the two individuals whom the Commissioner recognised had been unlawfully arrested, but no apology was forthcoming."

The Met response was to say admitting liability is enough.

The raid was also armed with photos of suspects from the previous day. Every protestor was filmed by an officer from FIT, or the Forward Intelligence Team, but what forced the Met to concede was that not one of them, contrary to intelligence, matched any of the photos.

"The deal we have negotiated with them is they will recover, will use their best endeavours to recover all the copies of the video that they made and that they will destroy them," Mr Grosz said.

"They will keep an original which will be under seal in store, and they will keep one copy of the DVD, which is a copy of the original. And as and when people settle their claims their images will be removed from that copy.

The Met's now facing a bill for at least a quarter of a million pounds if all 70 demonstrators lodge compensation claims against this illegal police operation, which was described one of the successful claimants as over the top, unnecessary and disproportionate.

Copwatch

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

Haha

23.03.2010 11:15

'The Met Commissioner admitted it was unlawful to arrest, search them, and force them to be recorded on film, but he refused to apologise to the protestors.'

I'm pretty sure I used to do this when I was about 5. Admit I was wrong but refuse to apologise.

Me


Mainstream media

23.03.2010 13:49

The mainstream media had an embedded film crew on one of these raids.

They reported the raids just as if they were the police propaganda department.

Of course the mainstream media want to keep this quiet.

There is a court case about G20 going on at the moment, but as there is no jury and professional judge is considered to not be influenced by the mainstream media that is not an issue.

Me


brave officers have a difficult job to do,

23.03.2010 14:46

so why don't they do it?

Nice to think that I may get a small amount of cash compensation, but I won't hold my breath.

How about identifying each of the officers who took part and charging them individually with aggravated trespass and assault and putting them in prison.

There is one law for us and another for them.

I had my head carefully an systematically cracked on the concrete floor during this attack. And I know it wasn't an accident because the 'officer of the law' as he pushed his armored knee pad into my back, whispered softly and tenderly, so that only I could here: "you've had it your way, now were having it our way" CRACK CRACK. I later received treatment from St. Johns Ambulance. When I returned to the building, it was boarded up, with my kit and my train ticket home inside. A week later, a climate camper managed to trace the buildings owner, so I was able to get my stuff out.

If the reader is thinking that I must be up to no good if I'm sleeping in someone else's property, just think of the cost of a hotel room for one night in the capital. And just think how many commercial properties are empty and unlocked.

I'm certainly not aware of any law that I have broken.

law abiding citizen


contact?

23.03.2010 15:54

I happen to be one of the people arrested in there, great news to hear that theres a chance to drain the police budget and give them a lesson, would anybody know who should I contact re this case?

harc
mail e-mail: harcesz@obin.org
- Homepage: http://htts://harce.wordpress.com


If you were arrested....

23.03.2010 16:05

If you are one of those who were arrested plz contact legal [AT] climatecamp [DOT] org [DOT] uk asap

Kia


Claims

23.03.2010 21:55

A N Other


next...

24.03.2010 10:40

go for it, but also think about what you want to do with the money. Personally I'd put the majority of it back into direct action campaigning - as well as that's how I got it, there's a nice circularity of the police funding lock-ons!

solidarity


Agreed

24.03.2010 16:22

I think we should spend the money on paying a deposit to have a new Rampart/Spike/Social center...
But lets first get the money.

Also... how much work is it going to be? will it be a long legal battle or do we just put our name on some list and claim the money, cause i don't really think I have it in me to have a massive court-case.

I was there and so was my granny


Witnesses?

24.03.2010 19:56

SchNEWS would like to speak to anyone who was at the raid or involved in the trial for comment in an article running this week. Please get in touch via our email address.

Thanks

SchNEWS
mail e-mail: schnews@brighton.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.schnews.org.uk