Skip to content or view screen version

(G20) Met Police to pay compensation after illegal raid.

Copwatch | 23.03.2010 10:54 | Repression | Social Struggles | Terror War

Met Police raid 'over the top, unnecessary and disproportionate'.

This is a repost from Channel 4 News. I have been searching for more news on this story, but the other mainstream media seem to be ignoring it.

Can anyone involved add more details please?

Met police to pay G20 protest compensation

By Channel 4 News

Updated on 22 March 2010

The Metropolitan Police are facing a compensation bill of £250,000, after admitting a raid on a climate change group the day after the G20 protests in London last April was illegal.

Police burst into the Convergence Centre in east London carrying taser guns, and handcuffed protesters face down.

The Met Commissioner admitted it was unlawful to arrest, search them, and force them to be recorded on film, but he refused to apologise to the protestors.

This was the day after the big city G20 demonstrations. A large convoy and a heavy handed police presence took up positions around a disused office block.

Senior officers claimed intelligence had picked out some of the more violent protestors who overnight had used the building as a squat.

As police burst in, the majority of the 70 demonstrators simply sat down. There was no resistance.

One person was caught behind a door and threatened. Another officer trained a 50,000 volt taser weapon on the group sitting down. They had come prepared for trouble but there was none.

Today the Metropolitan Police Commissioner agreed to pay £3,000 compensation each to two of those demonstrators and admitted the operation was unlawful because there were no reasonable grounds for suspicion.

Stephen Grosz, the claimants' lawyer, told Channel 4 News: "We did ask for an apology (from the commissioner), we asked first of all for a public apology to be made to all those who had been arrested. That was turned down.

"We then asked whether we could have a private apology addressed to the two individuals whom the Commissioner recognised had been unlawfully arrested, but no apology was forthcoming."

The Met response was to say admitting liability is enough.

The raid was also armed with photos of suspects from the previous day. Every protestor was filmed by an officer from FIT, or the Forward Intelligence Team, but what forced the Met to concede was that not one of them, contrary to intelligence, matched any of the photos.

"The deal we have negotiated with them is they will recover, will use their best endeavours to recover all the copies of the video that they made and that they will destroy them," Mr Grosz said.

"They will keep an original which will be under seal in store, and they will keep one copy of the DVD, which is a copy of the original. And as and when people settle their claims their images will be removed from that copy.

The Met's now facing a bill for at least a quarter of a million pounds if all 70 demonstrators lodge compensation claims against this illegal police operation, which was described one of the successful claimants as over the top, unnecessary and disproportionate.



Display the following 9 comments

  1. Haha — Me
  2. Mainstream media — Me
  3. brave officers have a difficult job to do, — law abiding citizen
  4. contact? — harc
  5. If you were arrested.... — Kia
  6. Claims — A N Other
  7. next... — solidarity
  8. Agreed — I was there and so was my granny
  9. Witnesses? — SchNEWS