Abortion rights protest outside parliament 21/10/08
Paddy Garcia | 22.10.2008 14:59 | Gender | Health | Social Struggles | World
Paddy Garcia
e-mail:
paddygarcia@btinternet.com
Homepage:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bolshie/
Comments
Hide 7 hidden comments or hide all comments
Apologies
22.10.2008 15:08
Thanks
paddy
Paddy Garcia
e-mail: paddygarcia@btinternet.com
Rights for women, no rights for the unborn child
22.10.2008 15:26
Human rights for all, including the unborn!!
Not a Christian fundamentalist
Not a Christian fundamentalist...
22.10.2008 15:44
Some guy
Contaception
22.10.2008 18:53
Anon
to not a christian fundamentalist
22.10.2008 20:21
jesus
Foxy ladies
22.10.2008 21:48
Not a Christian fundamentalist
Well you sound like one
23.10.2008 09:20
For all execpt fundementalists/other forms of MORON, the bottom line is this - No matter what I think about abortion, it is never something I will have to go through, and every case is completly different, hence it is not my right to judge. Womans body, womans choice. Simple
(A) Sab x
Deleted
23.10.2008 09:50
Anon
genius placard slogans
23.10.2008 12:09
Nice work girls.
k
Yet again
23.10.2008 19:07
K
keep your rosaries off my ovaries
23.10.2008 20:34
We should consider ourselves lucky to live in a society where abortions are legal, available, and of decent medical standards- and should protect those rights while we can.
"keep your rosaries off my ovaries"
Shouldn't embryonic humans / foetuses have rights too?
23.10.2008 21:30
Excuse my ignorance, but are there not many childless couples out there who would love to adopt an 'unwanted baby'?
In these enlightened times, I look forward to the day when 'pro-choicers' get a law allowing mothers to smother their offspring at birth. It's their baby after all, and far better than abandoning them on the street. Hurrah for democracy.
Note to IMC moderators: Just presenting another side to the argument here. No need to hide this comment and others like it just because your own opinion may differ.
Not a Christian fundamentalist, but allegedly a moron
And again
24.10.2008 09:22
K
Re: "Shouldn't embryonic humans..."
24.10.2008 15:07
That is not a reason to force someone to have an unwanted baby. Besides, if they're that fucking loving, why aren't they adopting those kids out there who really need a home? That's right, because they wouldn't get a cute little baby to show their friends. God forbid you guys have to start behaving a bit more like Jesus and a bit less like Paul.
"In these enlightened times, I look forward to the day when 'pro-choicers' get a law allowing mothers to smother their offspring at birth. It's their baby after all, and far better than abandoning them on the street. Hurrah for democracy."
And I look forward to the day when bullshit 'slippery slope' claims actually pass for a reasoned argument. Unfortunately, that day is not today. Next time you come up with something witty like that, you might want to check that it can't be turned around against you. How about we let 'pro-lifers' start having teenage boys arrested for genocide on the basis that every sperm was a potential life. Hurrah for Christianity.
"Note to IMC moderators: Just presenting another side to the argument here. No need to hide this comment and others like it just because your own opinion may differ. "
I agree. Stupidity should always be exposed and countered.
"Not a Christian fundamentalist, but allegedly a moron"
It was only "alleged" until you opened your mouth. Seriously, you might as well have signed off with "I'm not a racist, but..." because you're basically saying "I don't want to have to defend my position against any critical analysis, I just want to be able to tell you all that I'm right and you're wrong."
MonkeyBot 5000
angry
24.10.2008 17:59
K
k - you nicked my name
25.10.2008 10:03
real k
This is murder
13.11.2008 19:22
the pre-persons
Hide 7 hidden comments or hide all comments