Skip to content or view screen version

Nine NO2ID campaigners arrested at peaceful protest

Moon23 | 03.07.2008 21:06 | Repression | Social Struggles

On Monday (30th June) nine NO2ID campaigners were arrested after they
staged a peaceful protest at an invitation only Home Office so-called
"public consultation"

On Monday (30th June) nine NO2ID campaigners were arrested after they
staged a peaceful protest at an invitation only Home Office so-called
"public consultation". NO2ID's protest was an entirely peaceful and
lawful attempt to publicise the Home Office's shifty semi-secret
proceedings that had been pre-arranged with STV news. There was no
intention to frighten or inconvenience any member of the public. The
nine were charged with breach of the peace and bound over for 30 days.
One of those arrested had a 4 year old child with her. Another of those
arrested was a 68 year old retired academic. It took nine hours for the
last of the protesters to be released from police custody. John Welford,
NO2ID Edinburgh co-ordinator and one of the nine arrested, in a letter
to The Scotsman said: "What is it about the current Labour Government
that it is unable to tolerate any criticism of its policies and actions?
And why is it frightened to engage openly and honestly in proper debate
with the citizens of this country, especially about an issue as
controversial as compulsory identity cards and the setting up of a vast,
intrusive database state? ...the government prefers to organise its own
heavily controlled focus group meetings and private consultations away
in the shadows."

Moon23
- e-mail: moon_watcher_2007@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.no2id.net

Additions

Comment from activist

04.07.2008 08:36

"Nine of us have been charged for breach of the peace. Eight for causing "alarm and distress" for walking into the hotel wearing white suits and masks (despite two of them actually wearing unmasked East German border guard uniforms), and me for "alarm and disturbance" for infiltrating the meeting, putting my hand up to speak, taking the microphone when offered, speaking, and refusing to leave immediately while speaking after the minister requested that I do so.

Of the eight, one is a young lady who walked in after everyone else with a young child. The idea that she might have alarmed anyone is ridiculous. Another of the protesters was 17, on his first protest, doing only what I had told him - I'm very annoyed that he has been charged and had to spend a day in the cells at St Leonards.

There was a bit of heavy handed policing (they were responding to a 999 call and didn't know what they were facing) but it calmed down instantly the moment one of them realised they were being filmed by professionals and warned his colleagues. All protesters were entirely peaceful at all times.

I must emphasise that once the police realised that there actually wasn't any danger, they were all entirely courteous and professional throughout for the rest of the day. We still have to decide whether to file a complaint against the officer who ripped a mask of the face of a protester. He seemed a decent and friendly chap when I spoke to him later.

The police have told us that after speaking to groups of people inside, no one has any complaints about our conduct inside, there is no suggestion that we were anything other than peaceful. It is the "alarm" that has led to the charges "masked people in today's climate ...". Given that we had negotiated with the hotel manager to film an interview with STV inside (possibly after the 999 call had been made - that is still to be established), and were on our way out when the police arrived, I am surprised at the charges.

However, STV caught almost everything (except my contribution to the consultation) on camera. They followed the costumed protesters in, filmed them trying to negotiate entry, caught me being thrown out, an interview with me, our attempted departure, followed by the arrival of the police. Apparently we have made the main news programme, but couldn't see it ourselves.

We have all been bailed to appear before Edinburgh Sheriff's court on 24 July. I fully intend to use the occasion to highlight again how the Home Office are refusing to engage in debate with the public.

For clarification, I was not trying to engage in constructive debate inside the consultation. It would have taken hours to counter the nonsense that Meg Hillier was speaking and would have served little purpose. Instead, I concentrated on the fact that we and the general public had been excluded from the process.

There were a couple of amusing aspects. When I approached the registration desk just after the event started, I was able to see all the remaining badges and list of names - it was easy to select one. I entered the ID consultation with a newly-acquired false identity.

On entering the room, in which a video was playing, I slowly walked around to find the assigned seat for that person. Officials to whom I had been speaking outside appeared not to recognise me. No one challenged my entry as I took a seat. Meanwhile, officials who tackled the costumed protesters that tried to follow five minutes later asked the group if Dr Bevan was among them. So, they were looking out for me, but couldn't even spot me walking in late after I had been talking to them earlier. And these people think they are capable of controlling people's identities. Astonishing."

PS Most NO2IDers are aware of other civil liberties abuses such as those shown towards other activists. Solidarity is the key

moon23
mail e-mail: moon_watcher_2007@hotmail.com


Comments