Response to state crackdown on peaceful protest
Lynn Sawyer | 01.06.2008 10:36 | Stop Sequani Animal Testing | Animal Liberation | Repression
The recent sentencing of our friend Sean Kirtley says much about the state's view of peaceful protest in a nutshell the prosecutor Lockhart demos 4th june and 8th June
The recent sentencing of our friend Sean Kirtley to 4.5 years with conditions on release says much about the views of the police, the prosecutor Lockhart and the odious creep of a judge Ross. They obviously believe that the crime of holding a banner is worse than maiming someone for life. Many child rapists will serve less time, in fact someone who batters a pensioner to death if they plead guilty to manslaughter because for instance they were angry will walk out of prison before Sean. Ross and Lockhart clearly intimate that they think that killing and raping are lesser crimes than holding a banner outside a lab.They really are repugnant little men but we cordially invite (cos we are really nice) them (and everyone else) to a little picnic at West Mercia Police HQ Worcester on Wednesday 4th June at 13.00. We thought that as Lockhart was going to be there anyway telling the police how heretical we are and how we criticise the poor vivisectors and how we should be interned he might appreciate the gesture.
Not wishing Sequani to feel left out we are going there Thursday morning at 07.00 and again 12.00 Sunday 8th June. It is in Ledbury near the train station. Please bring anti SOCPA banners if you have them
Not wishing Sequani to feel left out we are going there Thursday morning at 07.00 and again 12.00 Sunday 8th June. It is in Ledbury near the train station. Please bring anti SOCPA banners if you have them
Lynn Sawyer
e-mail:
lynn@sawyer8749.freeserve.co.uk
Additions
145 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act
04.06.2008 10:10
Sean was found guilty of 145 SOCPA which means that if you "harm" an animal testing organisation you fall foul of it. "Harm" involves criticising (libel), "harassment" (a worker only has to say that they feel upset because someone is holding a banner), causing economic damage(eg they can provide receipts saying that they have spent money on new cameras because you have stood outside, trespass ad infinitum. An animal research organisation is one who has an animal testing licence obviously companies such as Huntingdon Life Sciences but this also includes for example Shell who are customers of HLS and have commisioned experiments on animals. Now the interesting thing is that 145 does not specify that it is only animal rights people who will face 5 years in prison and so when those who turn up at a Shell garage to hold a banner off the roof to demonstrate against climate change are imprisoned for 5 years just maybe sanctimonious, pompous, ignoramouses will finally wake up rather than looking down their noses at other activists! THIS AFFECTS EVERYONE
Lynn Sawyer
e-mail:
lynn@sawyer8749.freeserve.co.uk
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Disgraceful
01.06.2008 15:08
All of this shows the desperation of a panicking and otherwise failing government.
In solidarity, friendship and rebellion always... x
"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
Seriously Outrageous Corrupt Police Act
why do you ARers never give any background to your reports?
02.06.2008 21:35
not all knowing
To 'not all knowing' -
02.06.2008 22:18
X
kind of proves my point
03.06.2008 00:27
still not all knowing
not all knowing
05.06.2008 00:08
Everyone who protests should be aware that the law CAN be used against the protest of ANYTHING.
You do not have the right to protest and never have done,no one has ever had the right to protest in this country,there is no legislation to protect the `right to protest`. The hotch potch system of making it up as they go along, by the incompetent hierarchy prevalent in this so called democracy, can be traced back many decades.We,in this country are being driven to even greater subservience than our forbears ever were,the shoot to kill policy being just one warning of the state control we find ourselves in. The next phase is obviously trial without jury and the abolition of legal aid.
Anyway back to the point,Sean was convicted,on his own, of conspiracy to interfere with a contractual relationship so as to harm an animal research establishment, I repeat ON HIS OWN.None of the other defendants were found guilty of the charges as brought against them. No criminal damage to any property,vehicles,persons or anything other than what the perception of `the right to protest `is in the public opinion `peaceful protest` The amazing thing is that the judiciary can be seen to wish to protect the public perception of, the impartiality of the judiciary.That, in this case is some bloody joke,everyone involved and in the public gallery at this trial were shocked at the conduct of the trial and the disregard for trials past where precedents in law have been established.So you see its time.
Time for what you may ask,it is time for you twats and scoundrels,peasants and arseholes the dirt in the gutter and the snot on my sleeve to realise `you have no fucking rights`. Well really that is not entirely true, you do have fucking rights as it provides fodder for wars and more tax payers.Plus you get child allowance.
al asitis
Keep it secret
05.06.2008 06:52
This case affects every protest movement that has any possibility of achieving any success. So watch out anti arms campaigners after yesterdays EDO and Raytheon news.
Hush!