looks like it was oxy acetylened on the ground to me. but hey, why believe a rational scientific explanation when you can make up a fantastically complex scientifically impossible one instead?

This one crops up over and over again but as a real demolition welder would ask you straight away:-

How come there's so much slag ON THE OUTSIDE?

How come there's two corners he didn't cut yet are clearly sheered?

How come he wasted time in a dangerous situation cutting far more metal than he needed, to have the section removed by a crane supporting the wreckage?

Besides, this still image is attributed to the afternoon of the 11th, before the smoking gun that was the Saloman building, WTC7, came down?

I find it odd that so many otherwise intelligent sounding commenters have no wish to see this appalling episode properly examined by an international board of justices.

Of course this is only one facet of the discrepencies; there are other 'cut' columns, one of which was examined professionally and found to contain unusually large amounts of sulphur - the signature of military-grade thermate, not torch slag.

 http://www.patriotsquestion911.com

 http://ae911truth.org/