BBC World footage from 9/11 announcing WTC7 collapse 23 mins before the event
Chris | 28.02.2007 23:41 | Terror War | Sheffield | World
Attached is the footage from BBC World from September 11th 2001 covering the time running up to the collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7 (which was also knows as the Salomon Brothers Building) at 5:20pm.
On 22nd February 2007, an extensive archive of television broadcast footage covering the 9/11 attacks was discovered on the Internet Archive, and this was reported on 911 Blogger.
One activist then discovered that BBC World reported that WTC7 collapsed 23 mins before it happened and they produced the attached video.
The response from the BBC includes the statment, "We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening." So where did they get the news from that the building had come down, when it was still standing and can clearly be seen behind the reporter?
There are 4 other articles on the BBC World footage on Indymedia:
- Roasting the Beeb
- BBC Reported WTC-7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
- VIDEO: BBC WAS HALF AN HOUR TOO EARLY REPORTING ON WTC7 COLLAPSE
- BBC broadcast news of collapse of WTC 7 23 minutes before it actually happened
See also the 11th September 2001, Five Years On feature article which has a write up about WTC7 and links to the collapse videos.
Two other sources of information about Building 7 are WTC7.net and 11syyskuu.
Chris
Additions
FOI and investigation
01.03.2007 19:59
Perhaps this footage will be that leverage, maybe now people will wake from their stupor and realise that the news, as the corporate spokesperson for the government interests, is merely yet another tool of propaganda designed to make us stupid.
For the BBC Head of News to post a blog like the above offering by Mr Porter is really taking the p*ss. I don't like being the butt of Mr Porter's attempt at levity: Many decent people died that day and given that 911 was the pre-text to launch what was probably a pre-ordained attack plan against Iraq, many people have died and are still being killed as a direct consequence of 911. More specifically, they are dying as a direct result of what the governments of the UK and USA try to convince us happened.
And the news media are merely regurgitating uncritically the official narrative. Doesn't that make the BBC and its corporate cohorts at the least ethically responsible for allowing the Iraqi genocide to take place and for continuing. Isn't that a violation of the threadbare ethical percepts taught at journalism school? The BBC and its cohorts have failed humanity by simply regurgitating the official line, never calling it into account. And then the BBC's "documentary" on the "conspiracy" theories about 911 is just about the cherry on the top of this massive and unrelenting insult that masquerades as "news".
Two things should happen here:
1. Ofcom needs to be retained to look into this news broadcast for truth and impartiality and/or an independent investigation by a regulatory body needs to be convened - and have teeth (for a change)
2. An FOI request needs to be sent to request public disclosure of the sources of that feed (where did the teleprompt writers get their leads from?), the broadcast footage itself including the period after the feed was pulled/dropped; along with all email correspondence for the whole of the day of 911 and for two weeks later received by senior corporate executives, news writers, news readers, control room operators, and teleprompters.
3. The BBC should, under threat of having its license revoked and the public TV license fee cancelled UNLESS the BBC can offer a satisfactory account for this debacle.
grumpy old man
Follow up
03.03.2007 20:41
BBC TV: BBC Sept. 11, 2001 4:54 pm - 5:36 pm (September 11, 2001)
http://www.archive.org/details/bbc200109111654-1736
The head of BBC World has posted a follow up on his blog:
Part of the conspiracy? (2)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html
Chris
Updated video
04.03.2007 20:20
http://911blogger.com/node/6651
The video itself is available here:
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/wtc7-20min-warning-onbbc.avi
Chris
See also
04.03.2007 23:52
Clairvoyant Collapse
BBC World News announced WTC 7 had collapsed, well in advance of the actual event. Discovery by blogger prompts controversy. Angered counter-attack from BBC avoids issue: What was the source of the information? New 3-minute video compilation of the key points from the BBC broadcast, demonstrating foreknowledge of WTC 7 collapse. Read more for complete coverage of the last three days… (2/28)
http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20070228173157804
DOWNLOAD VIDEO – FREE DISTRIBUTION
http://www.911truth.org/911truthmedia/Video/BBC-WTC7.wmv
Chris
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
Rational analysis
01.03.2007 09:51
The reporting of events at the time of the attacks on the Twin Towers was to say the least chaotic, for several hours no news gathering operation really knew what was happening, the Whitehouse press office, the Department of Defenc(s)e at the Pentagon and just about anybody else in the US government had a theory. These theories ranged from tragic accident to full scale attack on the nation.
The four BBC reporters on the scene (three TV, one radio) were not even able to talk to eachother for much of the time and the WTC 7 falling story was one of a number of mistakes made that day by not only the BBC but other broadcasters as well. For example at one point the BBC reported that Air Force One has come under attack, that the Major of New York was thought to be in Tower one, and even that Australian swimmer Ian Thorpe was thought to be among the dead. Videos of these mistakes also may or may not still exist. On a day like September 11 it is not uncommon for video and audio tapes to be lost (mostly by editors)
These mistakes are the daily reality of instant news reporting where competition for the story is intense. During the reporting of 911 I am amazed more mistakes of this kind were not made.
I realise this explanation will not be accepted by those who are convinced of their ideas but perhaps for the wider readership of Indymedia they may be of interest. One final thought for some, the BBC is full of journalists, people who by their nature wish to tell a story. Proof of a BBC compliant in a US plot to destroy the towers would be worth a fortune to the individual who could report it, do you really think anybody could resist this.
Good luck with the continuing Indymedia experiment - Be The Media
Andrew (now independent journalist)
clairvoyant auntie
01.03.2007 12:43
solly
e-mail: s_olly at inbox.lvNOSPAM
I'm happy to see
01.03.2007 12:50
James Jones
Alternative explanation
01.03.2007 14:47
Can someone please deal with that before we get into fantasyland? No, too late.
a bit silly
My car
01.03.2007 15:31
all above board
oi! my car!
01.03.2007 18:10
a bit less silly than you
dumbo
01.03.2007 18:39
open your eyes
A "bit silly" is Really Silly
01.03.2007 20:18
It's a window! It's not a blue screen, the presenter is sat with a big window behind her and she turns to point things out behind her and the camera zooms in, also the BBC haven't tried to claim it's a blue screen.
In additon even if it was "time delayed footage" what difference would it make -- they announced the collapse 23 mins before it happened!
When those who are desperate to believe the official fantasy tale start making up things like this to ensure that they can continue to live in their illusion bubble it's rather telling... what lenghts are you going to go to next to ensure that your faith in the Imperial mass murderers running the USA isn't undermined?
lol
erm
01.03.2007 23:59
viewer
Google video on BBC power of future predictions is back on.
02.03.2007 00:10
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4859769454181174338
Puting KGB
e-mail: vice_president@whitehouse.gov
Homepage: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4859769454181174338
Red Herring
02.03.2007 01:45
Seb Patel
@ Seb Patel
02.03.2007 07:21
Scarlett O'Hara
Reply to viewer
02.03.2007 19:40
Because she clearly didn't know which building it was, how many people would have recognised it on the day?
People only know it from any angle now because they have seen so many vids and stills of it because it's such an unexplained mystery...
reviewer
A real Cock Up on London and New York
03.03.2007 10:24
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28pceQai32M
Fuck Bush
e-mail: youtubescum@mac.com
Homepage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28pceQai32M
No more Stonewalling from the BBC re WTC 7
08.03.2007 20:31
So Mr. Richard Porter of the BBC wants the whole 'BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell' scandal (and believe me, it IS a scandal even if you don't see it on the evening news) to just go away. The BBC is under the impression that knocking down a couple of straw-men and proclaiming 'nothing to see here folks' is going make us all just forget the monumental 'cock up' which is the BBCs attempt at damage control. The BBC is also under the impression that it is only a few 'lone nuts' out there hammering the YouTube and Google Video counts and that this story is going to lose all it's steam by next week.
Well Mr. Richard Porter. This is where you are so very wrong...
We the Undersigned formally demand the following information from the BBC.
1. Who was the source who told your station that the Salomon Building had collapsed?
2. Who from the BBC ordered YouTube and GoogleVideo to immediately start pulling the videos from their sites the day this story broke?
3. Who from the BBC ordered Archive.Org to block and then remove their copies of the footage which (until this story broke) were freely available online?
4. Who is responsible for and what were the circumstances surrounding the 'cock-up' which led to the loss of BBC World News' 9/11 footage?
5. Who cut reporter Jane Standley's live feed from NYC at 5:18pm (EST) on 11/09/01?
Until you answer these 5 questions IN FULL, you can expect the BBC's phones to be ringing daily with people asking these 5 questions over and over until they are answered.
Take a good look at the number of signatures here Mr Porter. These are the people who are demanding these answers and these are the people who WON'T go away.
Welcome to the Digital Age Mr. Richard Porter. You're either a news outlet or a supermarket tabloid. Which is it?
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
The Undersigned
Homepage: http://www.petitiononline.com/wtc7bbc/petition.html
simple truth
27.03.2007 07:11
fact
Link between WTC7 Demolition Preview Scandal and BBC Correspondent Abduction
10.04.2007 08:32
http://exodus.exblog.jp/5474652/
The reason why the Call for Lifesaving Petition of the BBC Gaza correspondent is abruptly closed
exod-US
e-mail: babalabo@kta.bigllobe.ne.jp
Homepage: http://exodus.exblog.jp
Link between WTC7 Demolition Preview Scandal and BBC Correspondent Abduction
10.04.2007 08:59
http://exodus.exblog.jp/5474652/
The reason why the Call for Lifesaving Petition of the BBC Gaza correspondent is abruptly closed
exod-US
e-mail: babalabo@kta.bigllobe.ne.jp
Homepage: http://exodus.exblog.jp
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments