Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

VEILS DRAWN? WOOL PULLED! CURTAIN DROPS - Oz Minderbinder - MENTION THE WARS

ex LEG IRONS | 16.10.2006 18:53 | Anti-militarism | Culture | Free Spaces | London | World

THE superfluous rehash of the French "to veil/unveil" con troversy from a brief comment in the MPs local paper, with a touch of em ploy ment law, to "throw in a crucifix" when that wasnt working seems little less than a desperate distraction from the fact that the "war/peace" debate - is at critical juncture. . . .CHIEF OF BRITISH ARMY gets support from S.times, USA ELECTIONS APPROACH fast

the "veil" debate is covered elsewhere - this is about the odd way that news "that isnt news" gets a twist to try to obscure all the other things that are VERY current from getting into talkshows - or - in this case - to get them out of the talkshows. . . .
. . . . FIRST - THE LATEST "SUNDAY TIMES" - from yesterday, has the piece that leads its second news section explaining in detail the way that the WMD searchers - in the run up to the invasion, then after, were putting in writing - every eleventh of the month - in fact - it seems - that the "WMD" DIDNT EXIST. The USA defence intel peoples dodgy lists got dodgier, then even dodgier, but - even if for some reason the S. Times has a MEMORY LAPSE when it comes to the two-person "OSP" - that did the rehashing of others "reject" intel-info - installed in the pentagon by a few in the new administration, or the AeI. lobbying group that paid for the iraqi defectors dubious information - in fact - had them fed, housed, paid for, perhaps even "ghostwritten".
Nevertheless - in media terms - this shows the newspaper trying to do the "we were sceptical at the time" bit to its regulars - (Orwells"we were never at war with. . . . we were always at war with") - so, a key moment in itself.
The Mail is trying to catch up with the scepticism of its audience about the war too - but it really doesnt want to have to - since peoples scepticism doesnt limit itself to the war in iraq - it is a scepticism about the entire "war of errors" - the "clash of cultures" theme too . . . . people have smelt VERY something odd, the doubts are highest amongst the establishment or those that are FAR from "lefties" , or those that could in the past get dismissed as "conspiracy theorists".
This means that even if the computers in the upcoming USAs elections have a few hitches again, the swing to "realo" might go much further - within the rpublicans as much as the USA .

ex LEG IRONS

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Ban the Bomb!

17.10.2006 09:41

A fabricated poll suggests that 98% of Brits want a ban on the veil, Evidently only non-Muslims were polled, but gladly, that makes me one of the 2% minority who thinks it's none of my friggin' business what people wear or what religion they choose.

I can think of more important things I'd like to ban, such as the xenophobic Cabinet from ever making a public statement again, and banning nuclear weapons, cluster bombs and D.U. or a ban on the British' media's relentless Islamophobic propaganda.

Miss Take


distracting, re-warming up "coldwar 2""badoldcostplus%"days -"clash-of-cultures"

17.10.2006 10:49

- YES,
Its a distraction, but every time some stupid mp or talkshow presenter spouts off about it, somebody gets glared at, insults, or worse.
Yes, after the top shirt button got discovered, a "tie" is a lot stuppidder than a veil - floppy codpiece substitute that it is - a throwback, against modernity, traditions that choke the . . . . etc etc etc etc,
OR - - - - "Opaque clothes, thats very quaint. What do they have to hide? All this pretence of grandeur, these false images they present - if these "personalities" were straight with the public, why clothes at all. TV studios are very hot.
OR - - - - Nuns next. Bad habits. Tall hats. Distract you from the lessons.

> > > > THE LESSON.
stop getting dragged into STUPID arguments with people when the ENTIRE "discussion could have got defused with a sharp gag.

Gags, thats yer problem. Unless, consenting adults, etc, etc, etc, etc.
Veils. Lets get something straight - if people could buy a "hangover veil", or "the acne veil", or even the "I am so sick of getting measured against fecking models that even have the PHOTOS retouched that if i could have worn a paperbag for half of my adolescence, then a third of the rest of the time, then i fecking might of. . . . " so, its jealousy ? wait up - if "they" are allowed to - then we can - or at least we might all treat each other as a bit different from "2D" Cardboard cut-outs to grade, possess, control, degrade, dump or diss.

. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
So is it alright if we all get back to the "stop the rackets - the dams breaking" ? LOOK - I SAID "ICEBERGS" stop minderbindershites stopsayingstop stopgaggingpeople stoptheinfowaryouneedtoseewhatshappening.



ps -any old clash of cultures . . . . or is the factthat its harder to get away with cash-laundering, scams etc in "strict", "fundamentalist", "extremist" "un-moderate" islamic practises - even if they aint perfect or anything . . . .

"clash of cultures???? modernity???? PROTECT THE fecking LOOPHOLES, EH????

- it is trying to distract people - so - WAR . . . . PEACE . . . . FOCUS.