Hezbollah delenda est

thus, to summarise:

anti-war = pro-biligerent
anti-israel = pro-hizballah

So, the protest is over, and Blair is so frightened that he decides today is the day to have his mass media announce to the world that he's staying for another year- I guess all the sheep will have to switch to 'Blair gone by the Xmas after next'.

Meanwhile, here's a video about 'purification'

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW1-_JmXQt0

(it's a capture from a canada TV news broadcast- not graphic but about as evil as anything as anything you could have seen or heard about the nazis)

And back to Lebanon. The usually carefully placed media leaks tell us that the US would LOVE to provide Israel with Stealth Bombers, and that Iran will provide the true Lebanese army with SAM systems (anti-aircraft surface-to-air missiles) in a few weeks time.

Now the US are not allowed to give Israel Stealth Bombers under the various treaties preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Why, because Israel could then load up the planes with city destroying nukes, rather than use the current (small payload) nuclear-tipped cruise missiles that their free German built submarines currently threaten the major cities of Europe and muslim nations with.

However, assuming the SAM story to be true, Israeli planes and helicopters will soon be blown out of the Lebanese skies, after they recommence their holocaust of Lebanon, when Israel arranges for the coming 'ceasefire' to be broken (probably by using their usual method of massive car bomb assasination attempts in Lebanon or Syria).

To carry on bombing Lebanon, safe from the counter-attack of the SAMs, will require high flying US stealth bombers (remember the Kosovo war) or similar, and these, for the reason given above, will have to be flown by the US military.

Now here is where it gets interesting. Israel destroys Lebanon as a proxy war against Syria, but the US will want to fight Syria as a proxy war against Iran. The US involvement will thus lose all interest in Lebanon, but claim that THEY need to bomb target-rich Syria (their excuse will be that they are leveling the playing field back to where Israel can holocaust Lebanon by air with no fear of any Lebanese defense- the only sort of playing field that the depraved Israeli cowards will play on). The US attacks Syria to stop those 'wicked' SAMs getting from Iran to Lebanon (if these SAMs exist, ***I*** would bet there are plenty waiting to be used in Lebanon at this very moment, but nevertheless this is the excuse the US will use).

At this stage, I don't think the US would attack Iran anymore than Israel would attack Syria today. Patience would be the order of the moment. The US would simply ramp up its attacks against Syria (as the True Lebanese army continued to successfully fight the Israeli terrorists) until the US was involved in a full scale Holocaust of Syria.

Blair will then be at the very dawn of his WW3 igniting genocide of Iran.

For those of you that do not understand why the US will become involved under the above scenario, it is because you fail to comprehend the absolute promise the US government has made to protect Israel under ALL circumstances. Israel losing in the air ***IS*** Israel losing full stop, and that triggers US action on behalf of Israel. Sending in the miles high bombers will be an easy option for Bush. Moving to attack targets in Syria rather than Lebanon will be justified all too easily. Stating that the bombing must go on until Syria surrenders under Bush's terms, and escalating the bombing when surrender is not forthcoming, will parallel the pattern of escalation we saw with the First Gulf War and the Kosovo War.

Has Iran been given a promise by Blair that the US will not become directly involved in the Lebanese holocaust? If so, they could not be so stupid as to believe it. In which case Iran is either gambling on an extraordinary response to Israel's loss of air assets, or they want the US to attack Syria in the hope that this will generate enough political 'blowback' to eliminate the US plan to wage war against Iran once and for all. Or maybe Iran thinks that the was is unstoppable, and they would rather have it begin this way for strategic advantage.

Jane's Defence Weekly's careful dissemination of the SAM story on behalf of Blair may simply be black propaganda (this poorly disguised front for the security services is often used for such purposes). However, what would be the point, if not for Blair to lay down a trail that he will request that Bush follows once the SAMs are in action?

If JDW is not just blowing smoke, i'll propose this likely summary of imminent events.

1) mock ceasefire (arranged by whoever, US, France, UN- it'll be just as phoney)
2) Israeli car bomb in Lebanon or Syria
3) True Lebanese army fires rockets in retaliation
4) Israel relaunches air based holocaust of Lebanon, as it intended all along
5) SAMs enter the equation, and Israel's holocaust operation is halted.
6) The US claims the SAMs make Israel vunerable, and start a program of ultra high altitude bombing of Syria (maybe they start with Lebanon, but probably not)
7) US bombing of Syria escalates just as Israeli bombing of Lebanon did earlier.

8) WE ALL AWAIT THE BEGINNING OF WW3 WITH THE EXCUSE THAT MOVES THE WAR INTO IRAN.

Of course, I am doing no more than attempting to make informed predictions based on current circumstances and propaganda actions. Want something more accurate, go ask Blair.

He is thoroughly disgusting. Its almost as if he had his tongue surgically grafted on to Bush's posterior. Unfortuantely the world is stuck with the boy blunder/chimpander-in-chief (Bush) until 2007, but doesn't the British Parliament have something like a vote of no-confidence? Why don't they employ it? Does it take a coma to get rid of these creeps?

Not entirely comforting to read about only one side being attacked (Iraq) whilst Israel has suffered equal amounts.

Keep the balance.