© The Author / CBRUK /KHOODEELAAR / LAWMEDIA 2006

Legal communication to Christine Gilbert on lbth council 'role' on Crossrail hole 31-1-2006


Dear Ms Gilbert

Re: KHOODEELAAR campaign meeting 22 January 2006 – the ultimatum to the council to pass full council resolution opposing the Crossrail hole, and the role so far of the controlling group on tower hamlets council


This is to confirm at 1400 Hrs GMT Tuesday 31 January 2006 that

1. You, still occupying the position of chief executive in the london borough of tower hamlets council [lbth] which position you occupied on 6 October 2004 when the KHOODEELAAR campaign members and supporters observed the formal meeting of the lbth council cabinet that went through an agenda item on the lbth council’s role on the Crossrail hole plan, have not either acknowledged or replied to or in any legally acceptable or evident way acted in acknowledgement of the demands contained in our communication to you on 23 January 2006,

2. You had written a letter to cbrukcentral in October 2004 in response to the CBRUK questionnaire sent to you [and otherwise published by KHOODEELAAR in the local community in tower hamlets and on the worldwide web] in which the CBRUK organisation stated that cllr Michael Keith, then chairing the lbth council’s regeneration committee, had misled the local community about the lbth council’s formal role and informal role in promoting the interests of the Crossrail hole scheme promoters. In that letter you had questioned the CBRUK central position and you also claimed that you had made notes or that you had had access to the actual notes of the meeting of 6 October 2004 and that those notes and your own recollections contradicted the CBRUK central position about Michael Keith having misled the local community on the role played so far by Michael Keith himself and by the controlling group on tower hamlets council in promoting the interests of those who wanted to dig a hole in the brick lane london e1 area.

3. You failed to answer the further questions, analyses and dissection that were then put to you by KHOODEELAAR and by the CBRUK central committee showing you the findings of all KHOODEELAAR investigations into the behaviour of cllr Michael Keith upto that time in promoting the Crossrail hole –pluggers’ interest and you were sent those in demonstrable accordance with the highest known and recognised standards of forensic pathology

4. You neglected to answer the questions or to deal with the evidence or to respond to the later and the newer and the more elaborate allegations the KHOODEELAAR campaign was making against the role you had played in allowing the violations of the constitutional duties and in tolerating or overlooking the illegalities being committed and perpetrated by sitting controlling councillors against the local community and against the local electorate and the local electorate on the matter of the Crossrail hole prompters and interests

5. You have continued in the past nine days [since the KHOODEELAAR campaign ultimatum of 22 January 2006] to show disregard for the law, to show contempt for the legal duties and the rule of law that you ought to have been following prior to the ultimatum of 22 January 2006 and you have done all of those and you have continued to fail to conduct yourself as the impartial, law-abiding, constitution-respecting holder of the publicly-paid position of chief executive because you have been in collusion yourself against the interests of the local community that is the target of the Crossrail hole attacks plan bill and that that collusion, that disrespect to the local community on your part is at odds with the statement which you published in the past 30 days after your having been included in Tony Blair’s ‘honours list’.

6. You have contradicted your own alleged affinity with the democratic rights and interest of the local community and on your alleged loyalty and your alleged respect to the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets

7. You have allowed your office to be abused again by the very interests that are threatening the local community in the London borough of tower hamlets.

8. You have according to the plans of the anti-social, anti-east end interest, pretended that you have not received our communication of 23 and 25 January 2006.

9. You have thus caused another hindrance against the community ands you have also taken part in another illegitimate but gigantic corruption of the powers and the remits of the LBTH Council in the illegal and the corrupting misleading of and via the relevant [mainly Council-funding related] elements in the local community by taking part de facto in endorsing the criminal interference with the democratic representation of the local community’s lawful and constitution demands that is contained in and symbolised by the single motion which Mr Muhammad haque put to the meeting of 22 January 2006 and which was unanimously passed by that meeting.

10. Because of your failure to comply with your legal duties and because of your disregard for the upholding of standard on the Council and because of your disappointing collusion with the illegitimate interests who now hold control on the Tower Hamlets Council, the KHOODEELAAR campaign must give expression to the legitimate and democratic imperative and need and necessity to call for your immediate resignation and [in the event that you refuse or fail to resign] for your being democratically and constitutionally removed from your office as your continued holding of that position is in contravention of your legal duties and as it is jeopardising the operation of the lbth council as the democratic representer of the local community in the London borough of Tower Hamlets.

End of the legal communication to Christine Gilbert Chief Executive of the LBTH COUNCIL London e14 2bg at 1450 hrs GMT on Tuesday 31 January 2006