Mrs. Menzez, Bombs As Plants?
Jordan Thornton | 29.09.2005 05:46
Sorry for the repost. Just wanted this here while this poor man's mother is in the UK. Who were the men photographed coming out of the station? Who did they work for? Where was your son working that morning? Where are the CCTV images? What did he witness, for he was most certainly silenced for it.
The recent exposure of an SAS False Flag in Basra certainly sheds new light on this situation ...
The recent exposure of an SAS False Flag in Basra certainly sheds new light on this situation ...
London: Bombs as Plants?
by Jordan Thornton
Email: pilgrim112 (nospam) hotmail.com (verified)
27 Jul 2005
Ignore the Downing Street Minutes, the LIES that led to an ILLEGAL War of Aggression for Profit, Karl Rove/Dick Cheney's TREASONOUS leak of a CIA operative, the Mossad agents in the Pentagon's OSP, AIPAC indictments, and calls for IMPEACHMENT, investigation, and prosecution, growing in both popularity and volume.
Keep your eyes fixed upon "ze terrorists" ...
Since none of 7/21's devices exploded, despite their detonators being triggered, and the LIAR Blair says that this stroke of luck will provide investigators with forensic evidence which will help to identify the culprits, does it not stand to reason that these were possibly intended as plants? It seems that care went into ensuring that nobody was hurt, but that this "orgy of evidence" was left for investigators.
The devices used on 7/7 contained military explosives, but much work has gone into flushing that fact down the Memory Hole, as seen in the "Egyptian Chemist" fable. The police used explosives in the apartment of one of the people being blamed for 7/7, thus contaminating the scene, then tarped the area off entirely.
No CCTV footage caught the bombers in the act, or riding the trains for 25 minutes from Luton to King's Cross, and we're supposed to believe what a pack of LIARS say, again without any independently-verifiable evidence, as was the case with "911"?
Other tapes (released in order to distract from the SAS False Flag being exposed in Basra, Iraq) show the men walking, on other days, as they probably take that route regularly as a part of their daily lives, but suddenly we're supposed to believe this was "practice"?
Why not simply show us the evidence which is still missing, which would prove these men had anything to do with 7/7 ... ? Does it, perhaps, simply not exist?
It feels as if the devices of 7/21, much like the almost-funny "rental car" filled with explosives and ID were left behind by someone eager to frame a certain target, and point investigators in a specific direction, possibly towards one of the PNAC target countries.
I'm not saying that I know this for a fact, it simply fits a certain pattern and tactic which HAS been employed in the past.
If it turns out that these devices point to Iran, Syria, etc., I simply would hope that people will THINK about today, before they rush to believe what a pack of proven LIARS wants them to think, based upon this "evidence" alone.
Especially if those LIARS attempt to use this as an excuse to wage another war that they've already got planned and at the ready.
And in the case of the Brazillian electrician, shot five times in the head by still-unidentified men, it would appear that he saw them doing something he should not have, and was silenced for it.
There is simply no other plausible reason to shoot a man this many times in the head ...
by Jordan Thornton
Email: pilgrim112 (nospam) hotmail.com (verified)
27 Jul 2005
Ignore the Downing Street Minutes, the LIES that led to an ILLEGAL War of Aggression for Profit, Karl Rove/Dick Cheney's TREASONOUS leak of a CIA operative, the Mossad agents in the Pentagon's OSP, AIPAC indictments, and calls for IMPEACHMENT, investigation, and prosecution, growing in both popularity and volume.
Keep your eyes fixed upon "ze terrorists" ...
Since none of 7/21's devices exploded, despite their detonators being triggered, and the LIAR Blair says that this stroke of luck will provide investigators with forensic evidence which will help to identify the culprits, does it not stand to reason that these were possibly intended as plants? It seems that care went into ensuring that nobody was hurt, but that this "orgy of evidence" was left for investigators.
The devices used on 7/7 contained military explosives, but much work has gone into flushing that fact down the Memory Hole, as seen in the "Egyptian Chemist" fable. The police used explosives in the apartment of one of the people being blamed for 7/7, thus contaminating the scene, then tarped the area off entirely.
No CCTV footage caught the bombers in the act, or riding the trains for 25 minutes from Luton to King's Cross, and we're supposed to believe what a pack of LIARS say, again without any independently-verifiable evidence, as was the case with "911"?
Other tapes (released in order to distract from the SAS False Flag being exposed in Basra, Iraq) show the men walking, on other days, as they probably take that route regularly as a part of their daily lives, but suddenly we're supposed to believe this was "practice"?
Why not simply show us the evidence which is still missing, which would prove these men had anything to do with 7/7 ... ? Does it, perhaps, simply not exist?
It feels as if the devices of 7/21, much like the almost-funny "rental car" filled with explosives and ID were left behind by someone eager to frame a certain target, and point investigators in a specific direction, possibly towards one of the PNAC target countries.
I'm not saying that I know this for a fact, it simply fits a certain pattern and tactic which HAS been employed in the past.
If it turns out that these devices point to Iran, Syria, etc., I simply would hope that people will THINK about today, before they rush to believe what a pack of proven LIARS wants them to think, based upon this "evidence" alone.
Especially if those LIARS attempt to use this as an excuse to wage another war that they've already got planned and at the ready.
And in the case of the Brazillian electrician, shot five times in the head by still-unidentified men, it would appear that he saw them doing something he should not have, and was silenced for it.
There is simply no other plausible reason to shoot a man this many times in the head ...
Jordan Thornton
Comments
Display the following 14 comments