Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

London Bombing - What can we do?

pentos | 17.07.2005 09:51

Let us act

An alternative scenario, every bit as plausible as 'four lads from Leeds went nuts and blew themsleves up':

Through a system of targetting under the cover of observing muslim radicals in the UK, three or four likely candidates are selected.
Early on the morning of the blasts they are 'arrested' and whisked away to a holding facility somewhere. They are asked to participate in an 'identity parade' wearing backpacks 'like the suspects' and asked to pose beneath CCTV cameras. (The image published of the alleged bus bomber incidentally, shows only him alone in a tiled, artificially-lit environment, with no other people in shot -unusual, you might say for the height of the rush hour). Once the images are stored, the men are murdered, their clothing and ID taken from them, and planted for incrimination at the bombsites.
The video is seemlessly spliced into extant footage, for the more pedestrian plods to 'find'.

Doubtless we poor mugs will never see it in its original format for scrutiny, any more than we ever saw any of the 'evidence' left by the alleged perpetrators of 911 or Osama Bin Scapegoat.


I too was thinking for some time that the bus blast was an error, until I did a little more delving:
It seems that in 1898 the first zionist chief (publicly anyway) was one Chaim Weizmann, a chemist residing in Bloomsbury. It was here he drafted the Balfour Declaration which ultimately led to Britain lending its weight to the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. His address? 77 Great Russell St, a stones throw from where the bus actually exploded. The blasts were on 7/7/7 (2005 resolves to 7 - 2+0+0+5=7).
Given that zionism and freemasonry are inseparable and that to these people numerology is of great import, one cant help but wonder.
How many for instance, knew that the Madrid bombings took place exactly 911 days after september 11th 2001? - Fact! not conjecture or 'loony theory'.

Is it possible that the bus bomb was intended to detonate
outside 77 Great Russell St, in order to provide a clear example that the 'arabs' attack was at once, an assault on London AND Israel?
Ask yourself how many times since the bombings have pudits appeared on TV, radio and in the press drawing comparisons with Israel?

The parents of one of the victims of the bus blast, interviewed shortly after he was identified, were puzzled as to why he was on the right bus, but going, in their words, in the opposite direction. The bus was the only one diverted at that point - who I wonder, ordered the diversion?
Had the bus bomb not gone off when it had, would the bus's diverted route have taken it down Great Russell St?

And Richard Jones, the eyewitness said to have seen the bus bomber fiddling with the package and 'annoying me' to the extent he got off the bus seconds before it exploded.
Who is he? Why does his testimony appear differently depending which source you look at?
"Everybody is standing face to face and this guy kept dipping into this bag," Richard Jones, 61, of Berkshire, told the BBC.
Standing is allowed on the lower deck on London buses but not on top.
If the bomber was sitting at the back on the top deck as we are told, how does Jones know he was 'dipping into his bag?'

We are told the police's first lead to Yorkshire was the boy's parents reporting him missing thursday evening following the bombings.
His parents then, presumably knew he was in london that day - what was his stated reason for being there?

And the published claims that the bus CCTV system had not been operating since June, have apparently been roundly derided by bus drivers.

CALL TO ACTION:
1.Does anyone know Richard Jones? Who is he?

2. A.Does anyone know the driver of the bus?
B.What was his diverted route - Would it have taken him down Gt Russell St?
c. Who ordered the diversion?

3. Does anyone know any of the other Stagecoach drivers from the same depot as the No30, and if so what's the truth about the CCTV 'inspectors' having spent more than 20 hours there the previous weekend?

4. the Atlanta Journal - Constitution says that "Police arrested a relative of one of the suspects and brought him to London for questioning."  http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/0705/13london.html
A. Who was this individual.
B. To whom are they said to be related?

5. What was the supposed reason for the men to have travelled to London? The reason told to their parents?

6. What is the common denominator? How did these four know each other?

We can expect no help from the media cartels in whose interest complete belief in the official story lies. We need to establish answers to these questions INDEPENDENTLY if we are to begin to pick truth from this haystack of lies.

pentos

Comments

Display the following 5 comments

  1. "every bit as plausible " ??? — my view
  2. A Call to action — pentos
  3. Hey Pentos — A. Lexicon
  4. forget the conjecture, look at the call to action — pentos
  5. the audiolingual method — Prof. Magoo