Tonight on Italian TV
Daniele | 08.07.2005 20:40 | Analysis
Berlusconi said today Italy would start withdrawing some of its troops from Iraq in September. What's the deal? Fear of a terrorist attack on Rome? The media lobbyists - er, journalists - argued that point on Italian TV tonight
The political talk shows are winding down for the summer holidays, but they made a special effort tonight on La7, a private channel owned by Telecom Italia (not one of Berlusconi's!). Hosts: Giuliano Ferrara, an ex-communist- turned-socialist- turned-Berlusconian- turned-neocon, who led the 2003 media blitz in favour of the invasion of Iraq, and Gad Lerner an ex-radical-turned-soft-middle-of-the road-centrist-cum-leftie who also lobbied for the war but has since recycled himself as "one of the few who were opposed to it". Guests: Paolo Miele, the editor of Italy's No. 1 newspaper, Corriere della Sera, a rag that will happily translate and publish anything the Bush war machine sends its way; Maurizio Molinari, a journalist in London (and also a keen propagandist for Iraq invasion); Piero Fassino, the secretary of the main Italian leftwing (ex-communist) party; and an "expert in religious sociology". Lots of journalists in there, but here they are so embedded they are they usually outnumber the "experts" on opinion shows.
To get to the point - is Berlusconi "appeasing terrorism" by announcing a mini-withdrawal? - the show touched on a few interesting themes. Miele, the newspaper editor, challenged the others to come up with a better way to spend all those billions if not on war. The party secretary did - better intelligence, an end to the obsession with military solutions ("a war on Iran would be a bigger catastrophe than the war on Iraq" - and no one objected, interestingly), and policies in Europe for integrating and giving full citizenship to muslim immigrants. Miele objected that European muslims "haven't changed", and that he awaited the day when even one muslim would denounce a terrorist plot (this after untold cases in Italy of false arrests of imaginary terrorists, all of them dutifully reported as fact by newspapers like Corriere della Sera).
The discussion swung to European muslims, with the editor and the neoncon co-host hammering away at the "Islamic threat", although - interestingly - on the TV news tonight the Berlusconi channels (five to choose from) were anxious to show how muslims in Italy had condemned the London attacks. The "muslim fifth column" card seems to be part of the game plan for increasing paranoia and garnering consensus but it's not getting far, so far.
Ferrara, the neocon co-host, tried anyway, asserting at one point (kid you not): "You can't integrate people with head scarves, we have to win a global war against islamic fundamentalism!" Well, it worked in 2003...
Finally, they got to the B. question. Is Silvio "dropping his pants" in the face of the terrorist threat, as the neocon Ferrara suggested (rhetorically, I mean, he is after all the editor of a far-right rag owned by Berlusconi's wife)?
The editor of Corriere della Sera tried to get in a shot at Zapatero for "caving in to terrorism" but, faced with the recycled leftie's objection that "Zapatero just did what he promised the electorate he would do", was reduced to describing the decision to withdraw Spanish troops from Iraq as "inappropriate".
But in the end all agreed that withdrawing 300 of Italy's 3,000 troops starting in September was unlikely to endear him to the al Qaida bombmakers, and Rome - or somewhere in Italy - is a target. With popular opinion in Italy so much against the war - and Bush, who really gives people the creeps - Berlusconi must know he is history if that does eventuate. (A recent survey of rightwing voters here found the majority were against the war.)
So, there you have it - a slice of opinion from Italy.
Daniele Massi, reporting (twice?) from Rome for indymedia...
To get to the point - is Berlusconi "appeasing terrorism" by announcing a mini-withdrawal? - the show touched on a few interesting themes. Miele, the newspaper editor, challenged the others to come up with a better way to spend all those billions if not on war. The party secretary did - better intelligence, an end to the obsession with military solutions ("a war on Iran would be a bigger catastrophe than the war on Iraq" - and no one objected, interestingly), and policies in Europe for integrating and giving full citizenship to muslim immigrants. Miele objected that European muslims "haven't changed", and that he awaited the day when even one muslim would denounce a terrorist plot (this after untold cases in Italy of false arrests of imaginary terrorists, all of them dutifully reported as fact by newspapers like Corriere della Sera).
The discussion swung to European muslims, with the editor and the neoncon co-host hammering away at the "Islamic threat", although - interestingly - on the TV news tonight the Berlusconi channels (five to choose from) were anxious to show how muslims in Italy had condemned the London attacks. The "muslim fifth column" card seems to be part of the game plan for increasing paranoia and garnering consensus but it's not getting far, so far.
Ferrara, the neocon co-host, tried anyway, asserting at one point (kid you not): "You can't integrate people with head scarves, we have to win a global war against islamic fundamentalism!" Well, it worked in 2003...
Finally, they got to the B. question. Is Silvio "dropping his pants" in the face of the terrorist threat, as the neocon Ferrara suggested (rhetorically, I mean, he is after all the editor of a far-right rag owned by Berlusconi's wife)?
The editor of Corriere della Sera tried to get in a shot at Zapatero for "caving in to terrorism" but, faced with the recycled leftie's objection that "Zapatero just did what he promised the electorate he would do", was reduced to describing the decision to withdraw Spanish troops from Iraq as "inappropriate".
But in the end all agreed that withdrawing 300 of Italy's 3,000 troops starting in September was unlikely to endear him to the al Qaida bombmakers, and Rome - or somewhere in Italy - is a target. With popular opinion in Italy so much against the war - and Bush, who really gives people the creeps - Berlusconi must know he is history if that does eventuate. (A recent survey of rightwing voters here found the majority were against the war.)
So, there you have it - a slice of opinion from Italy.
Daniele Massi, reporting (twice?) from Rome for indymedia...
Daniele
Comments
Hide the following comment
Innit a good view of Italian christian mafia massoneria
08.07.2005 22:23
landed the bourbon fleet being the strongest in the med. britain however ruled the waves.
Still they talk of left and right and don't it just make you puke.
But Daniele highlights how lefties become right and verse vice I read an amusing article by Michele Serra Il manifesto which warned of centre right centre left cos they tend to shaft you dead centre right up the arse hole.
Is there any difference ? well I suppose you of the left would know 4 sure.
certainly Lard mountain " Giuliano Ferrara, an ex-communist- turned-socialist- turned-Berlusconian- turned-neocon, who led the 2003 media blitz in favour of the invasion of Iraq" or per perhaps Gad Lerner or some other politico scum bag would know. Sure they are on the TV every night collecting their over inflated fees for spouting of over a load of over inflated borrox. Berslusclone controls the air waves and while over inflated pompous windbags dominate proceedings he is free to continue with his money laundering interests.
Uk residents are mostly under the impression that Britain is in some way superior to the med countries (an belgium) but in actual fact the media is controlled by the UK's own berlusclone Rupert Murdog and money laundering is play for today. Post WW2 American fuckery in italy is quite well documented with P2 and Gladio
strategy of tension and all the rest of it but it seems to have escaped the attention opf most brits even though
we were eating kellogs corn flakes and other american crap at least 20 years before the Italians.
I grew up with cow boys and Indians / goodies and baddies WW2 war films , the 1967 three day war and almost fell for it . Err the goodies are actually the baddies and now under standing what Order through chaos means sure i am going to fall for a bunch of A rabs planting bombs in London to further the cause .
What i find hard to swallow is that there are so many so called alternative folks putting comments on IMC UK who still believe in "the Left" and for thhat matter "the Right". Why not look nat it as rich and poor or those with power and those with out. Everytime I read some one bleating on about the left it makes me cringe. take a look at italy where the mafia is running things. and tell me that the UK is any different !!!
garibaldi