Skip to content or view screen version

Open Source Software Threat to Windows

Edward Campbell | 10.05.2005 16:16

Microsoft Corporation’s most significant threat to its domination of computer software markets operating systems is Open Source Software, according to its own chief executive, Steve Balmer.

Harold Hamlet confusingly starts an "Up OS - bring down Microsoft - " campaign campaign in warwickshire countryside.
Send campaign donations to support Harolds campaign tour.


Its monopoly in the UK public sector will be eroded as local authority plans to increase use of free, or very low cost, alternative open source (AOS) are implemented. The Public sector spent £12.4 billion on information technology in 2003-2004, of which a chunk went directly into the bank account of the world’s richest man, and largest shareholder in Microsoft, Bill Gates.

“The savings could be spent on new public housing and schools, rather than unnecessary crap software, and allowing Bill Gates to build another £100 million house”: said Harold Hamlet, a Windows 98 user from the Midlands region of England, UK. Harold added: “ I am sick to the teeth of paying some of my community taxes to Gatesy - he’s done chuff all for me and the misses, or our town. ”

Harold is threatening to throw his windows 98 out of the window in a symbolic act, but will wait until AOS is installed on his Amstrad first: “You don’t chuck your misses until you’ve got another lined up do you? Think about it”. He, for no apparent reason, added, “Stroll on the slow down in the economy”, slightly perplexing the interviewer.

He later admitted, after a few free jars of ale from the author in his local – the Goose, Berries N’ Balls - that he doesn’t know how to get hold of (AOS), and is relying on someone responding to this piece. “One of those largely forehead boffins who read loads of book’s know the score, ” he appealed.

After several rounds at the bar, stood by the yours truly, the barman, who never utter a word outside the language necessary for transacting the sale of alcohol, spoke, to the shock of the watching crowded bar.

Unknown to them, he secretively submitted occasional articles to the Financial Times, which I found out from his membership form for the Nation Union of Journalists that I slyly perused on a following visit to King’s Cross.

This is what came out of that normally mute average looking red-faced barman:" For a company such as Microsoft whose most familiar competitive tactic has been to undercut rivals on the price, free open source software such as the Linux operating system has represented a new and unusual threat.”

The crowd in the bar went silent for a painfully extended moment … crash! Went Harold’s glass as it hit the old wooden floorboards. The silence deepened.

The barman, now his cover as an FT undercover reporter was blown, gushed " the UK economy is weakening but inflationary pressure is growing … blip or depression? … rebalance the economy towards savings and investment or were all fucked …".


After what felt like an hours dead silence, Harold took hold of the situation and lowered the tension. The stunned businessmen who were in for their liquid lunches were shocked as "red faced mutes" (as they affectionately called him) words.

“George! You scared the shh .. the the … life out of me.. live abd learn eh; you been drinking to much of those slops again. Get me another beer for the one you caused me drop, and its quits,” said Harold Hamlet in his matter of fact way.

George, the barman, sheepishly obeyed Harold who knew Harold's glass had been empty. George never missed a trick no matter how pissed he got on drinking up the left overs, and the whiskies he could nick. But Harold's quick thinking ruse got the better of him, after his unintended fall out of character. Harold never missed an opportunity to scank a free beer.

They all laughed, joked and were merry again - until incorrigble trouble-maker Harold held up his full glass of ale, and proclaimed; “To the end of Microsoft, up the recession.”

Edward Campbell

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

Absolutely bonkers! :-)

11.05.2005 09:51

That's the craziest piece of writing I've read in a long time. How on drugs is that!

A serious message about microsoft though. And yes I've often been thinking, economies should be focussed less on consumption and more on investment (useful investment).

Jack


some instructions

11.05.2005 10:39

Look this is all true, and its REALLY easy for all of you to start using software that is completely free, and undermines some of the biggest corporations in the world. Make every time you open a piece of software an act of resistance to capitalism! (Well sort of anyway, even though your PC is a blatant product of capitalism....)

For a start, get rid of your pirate or cracked copy of MS Office, and download OpenOffice from  http://www.openoffice.org/. This is totally free, open source (which is a sort of anarcho-communist form of software development). It opens and saves to your MS Office formats too, so you won't have any trouble opening old documents and making new ones that need to be used on MS Office machines.

Next step, stop using Internet Explorer to browse the internet, cos' its rubbish. Use open-source Firefox instead which can be downloaded from  http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/. This allows 'tabbed browsing' (which means you can be on several different websites inside the same window); it also imports all of your bookmarks and settings from Internet Explorer with no trouble, and is better at protecting your system from spyware and stuff like that.

You might also want to stop using Windows Media Player which is full of bugs, and uses loads of resources. I use coolplayer for MP3s because its 30k in size and plays formats like Ogg and MP3 amongst others. It also has a playlist facility and other stuff like that. Its available from  http://coolplayer.sourceforge.net/. Windows Media Player Classic is available from  http://www.divx-digest.com/software/media_player_classic.html and is a good replacement for Windows Media Player when playing your videos n things. Please note that you can't actually remove Windows Media Player from your system at present - but you can stop your system from using it whenever you want to open certain types of files.

To get rid of Spyware, use AdAware available from  http://www.lavasoftusa.com/support/download/, and SpyBot Search and Destroy at  http://www.safer-networking.org/en/index.html.

In a couple of years a Linux operating system itself will be a good replacement for MS Windows; already you can purchase PCs with Linux instead of Windows. Its up to you when you completely wave goodbye to the days of corporate software piracy and embracy open source :) Microsoft is staring into the abyss, which is why US politicians are calling open-source a 'threat to national securty'.

anti-Micro$oft.


Overrated and unready

11.05.2005 12:32

Microsoft are wise to keep their eyes open to any threat to their market but I doubt they have many concerns about Linux desktops overtaking Windows in the near future.

The simple fact is that it's a million miles away from being usable enough for everyday use by home or small business users. More's the point, while Windows and the applications cost money, they are actually cheap enough to be affordable for just about everyone in the developed world who's got a computer. Microsoft are right when they say that the total cost of ownership for Windows is lower than Linux/Open Source. Why else haven't we seen a mass migration to Linux? The barriers to entry are enormous, but they're nothing to do with the purchase price of the software. Both home and business users realise this.

If OSS advocates really want to change the face of the industry, they might want to spend more time concentrating on the needs of real users, rather than trying to build a geek dream and doing endless "advocacy". OSS is great for running small servers (if you've got experienced staff) and things like Firefox are neat. But OSS is as far from displacing Windows/Office as it has ever been. I secretly suspect that most OSSers like it that way and would be hunting around for something else "exclusive" if Linux ever became more popular than Windows.

Don't forget that most people haven't got an ideological problem with capitalism and paying for the products they consume. As long as the software is affordable enough and good enough, they'll carry on using what they've got.

People have been saying that Linux is a "couple of years" away from being primetime for as long as I remember. You can dream, but I see no evidence that it's being developed in that direction. Far from "staring into the abyss", Microsoft is almost unimaginably rich and would have to make multiple, massive strategic errors over a very long period of time to be threatened in any way at all. I won't say never, but I don't see it happening in the forseeable future. The gradual shift to the "software as a service" model makes it less likely that OSS will take off, eg. Google and Gmail.

Adrian


oss

11.05.2005 19:51

Errr, countries around the world are switching to Linux. And most servers run on Linux too. And now the UK Government is considering open source alternatives to corporate software. The writing is on the wall. And while Linux may be a few years away, Open Office and other programs like these are here now! So start D/L them.

Krop


Linux on the up and up

12.05.2005 10:11

Three news stories from the last 10 days...


Cost, security and dissatisfaction with Microsoft will drive almost two-thirds of local authorities to increase their use of open source software over the next three years, according to new research.
The survey of 99 local authorities by local government IT user group Socitm and the Financial Times found 60 per cent intend to extend the use of open source in their infrastructure, while 35 per cent said it will stay the same. Just one per cent said use of open source will decline.
 http://software.silicon.com/os/0,39024651,39130263,00.htm


The study carried out by British Educational Communications and Technology Association (Becta) points out the
high costs necessary to administer and maintain the computer systems equipped with proprietary software products. The study also shows that by adopting open-source products, the Ministry of Education and Becta’s expenses would decrease with up 50%.

By eliminating costs associated with usage of proprietary software and switching to open-source solutions, the schools and colleges from England could save millions of pounds causing Microsoft to lose enormous sums of money.

This would be another step back made by the software giant, which has already lost important battles with the open-source alternatives chosen by several renowned companies, banks, but also by governments and non-governmental organizations.
 http://news.softpedia.com/news/Kids-meet-Linux-your-new-operating-system-1775.shtml



The rural Spanish region of Extremadura has seized on the potential of open source software to improve the lot of its citizens and kick start the local economy
Like the governments of countries such as Venezuela, China, Thailand and India, Extremadura has been pumping money into the research and promotion of locally developed software as a way to keep pace with technological investment in other parts of the world and give its economy a boost. While Western European cities such as Vienna, Munich and Paris have only recently latched onto the potential of Linux, Extremadura has been heavily investing in open source software for years.
 http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,39020463,39197928,00.htm

Mayler@linuxmail


welll.....

12.05.2005 11:32

Heres a list of what has been happening recently:

China has/is developing its own Linux OS for use in government offices.
The French government has paid Manrake Linux (now mandriva) for several departments to use.
Michael Dell (ceo of Dell) just invested $100M in Red Hat Linux
Novell purchased Suse Linux - to use it as a more stable, usable backend to netware
Microsoft announced support for linux in Virtual Server 2005 as it is 'a popular choice on the x86 and 64bit platforms'.
Walmart (yeah I know) have started stocking cheap computers with linux pre-installed.

There are many many more such things that have occurred. This is a lot more than a few years ago - ie it is a growth market (reckoned to be about 25% growth pa iirc).

So, before making statements saying Linux can't win, do some research first.

Also, I use Linux because it is free, stable, good and I'm not tied to a vendor. The statement about people only using linux because it is elite is bull. There are many more OSS operating systems out their, be they BSD based or anything else.

fredrico
mail e-mail: musteatvegan@yahoo.co.uk


The exceptions rather than the rule

13.05.2005 18:54

I think it tells us something in itself that there's a news story every time an organisation adopts OSS.

To squash the myth about "most servers run Linux", well, they don't. Most _web_ servers run Linux, but most workgroup servers run Windows and there are a great deal more of them. This is understandable given the Internet's Unix roots. If any OSS system had even the 20% market share in any other sector that MS has on web servers, I think they'd be doing very well.

Various people are investing money in OSS but it's a fraction of what they invest in proprietary software. More's the point, neither you, I nor they know when or whether their investments are going to produce a return.

There is a huge difference between the server and desktop markets. I note the local authority survey quoted above said that 60% were planning to increase OSS use in their _infrastructure_. That doesn't mean they'll be installing OpenOffice and Firefox across all their desktops, let alone a full OSS desktop OS. And think what _increase_ means. It doesn't mean "replace all existing proprietary systems". It just means increase, say, from 5% to 10%. Maybe less. A router here, a print server there. Very often it'll mean replacing a proprietary Unix with an OSS one. Hardly something that MS is going to worry much about. Sun, SCO, HP and IBM stand to lose far more from OSS than MS for reasons which I hope are obvious, and naturally are "investing" heavily to maintain their market shares.

Likewise the schools IT study. Despite some people's enthusiasm, the major limiting factor is lack of qualified staff. The market is awash with semi-skilled staff with MS skills that are cheap and just about good enough to keep a medium-sized network running. People with real *nix experience are in far shorter supply and cost a great deal more. Ditching MS Office for OpenOffice is one thing, pulling out all the servers and desktops is quite another. There are some underpaid Linux enthusiasts running systems in schools but they are the exception rather than the rule. As the report quite rightly points out, school managers are extremely apprehensive of these people leaving as they'll be very hard to replace.

Let me know when your parents start running Linux and find it as easy as Windows, when corporate managers consider it not an issue to replace MS Office with OpenOffice and still be able to run all their documents seamlessly, when there are OSS replacements for the millions of quirky one-off classic VB applications out there, when there is an OSS publishing program and _desktop_ database worthy of the name that's 100% compatible with Access, etc.

It comes down to the fact that there are only three good reasons for running OSS:

1. Ideological.
2. You actually _need_ access to the source code because you're going to modify it.
3. The software itself is so much superior to the alternatives that it's worth the cost and pain of switching, principally retraining all your staff/users.

For most people and in most markets, for now and the forseeable future, none of these reasons apply. OSS is a lovely idea and there are some good systems out there, but for most of the world, it's a solution in search of a problem.

Adrian


again... you speak rubbish

14.05.2005 16:19

You will note that everytime Microsoft does something it is in the news, as with Intel, AMD and any other computer company. This is the same with Linux.

You say that you will be suprised if Linux has more than 20% of market anywhere other than web servers, well according to IDC ( http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_05/b3918001_mz001.htm) it has a 24% market share of the workgroup server market you mention. And this is predicted to increase to 33% by 2007.

According to IDC in another report, that figure is at 27% ( http://news.com.com/2100-1001-253320.html?legacy=cnet)

So, as these articles point out - you are wrong. Linux is gaining ground very fast.

fredrico
mail e-mail: musteatvegan@yahoo.co.uk