CLIVE SOLEY MP and NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
b.jones | 04.04.2005 17:21 | Analysis | Indymedia | Repression | London | World
Any tenants of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST (a housing association supported by CLIVE SOLEY MP) that are still suffering from harassment, nuisance, negligence, theft of their mail, anti social neighbours (housed there intention-ally by their landlords) or any other unlawful tactics by their landlords - then get in touch with this website.
CLIVE SOLEY MP - the Labour MP of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush - is closely associated with the anti social policies that have been introduced into the Labour controlled housing association of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST based in Hammersmith Grove, central Hammersmith, just behind the Hammersmith underground station on the Hammersmith and City line.
CLIVE SOLEY MP has waged a very dirty campaign supporting his Labour friends that run Notting Hill Housing Trust against all the vulnerable tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Including all his very vulnerable constituents of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush.
Iain Coleman MP, the MP for Hammersmith and wife of Dame Sally Powell [sister of Jonathan Powell, the chief of Staff of Tony Blair MP and brother of Thatcher's favourite PR man Charles Powell. He was paid £120,000 and was one of the driving forces behind the decision that one of the quickest ways to show that the Labour Party was pro-business was to take funding from business. Another of his brothers, Chris Powell, was Managing Director of BMP DDB Needham, the Labour Party's advertising agency for the 1997 election] a member of Labour's National Executive was found by POLICE in Harley Street last week hunched over the whel of her red TOYOTA rocking backwards and forwards totally drunk with the key which she had already turned in the ignition. She was found with 61 micrograms of alcohol in 100 milliltres of breath - way over the 35 micrograms limit.
Although she pleaded GUILTY at Horseferry Road Magistrates COurt on 3 February 2005 to being drunk in charge of a vehicle, she received nothing more than an £800 fine, £250 costs and 10 points on her licence.
The judge - perhaps thinking in terms of the possibility of promotion within the legal hierarchy - decided there were 'special reasons' for Sally POWELL to be allowed to continue driving. [Arguing that she was the only person available to drive him to hospital for treatment - but what of her responsibilities as a Labour Councillor?]
On 21 January 2005, Sally POWELL welcomed extending licensing hours. She said it was a good idea that responsible councillors such as herself should take over licensing powers. Yet a ban or custodial sentence is usual in such cases where a driver is found with a high alcoholic content in their blood.
Does it not appear there is one law for some and another for the rest of us?
With the senior Labour party official who helped bring forward plans for longer pub opening - Dame Sally POWELL - was found drunk at the wheel of her car.
Returning to tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust, one of the vulnerable tenants of the Trust went to try to seek the help of Iain COLEMAN MP at the House of Commons - but the MP made it very very clear that he was not prepared to help - even though he was sought out and personally summoned from the Chamber of the House of Commons to the Central Lobby. [Perhaps the MP believed the spin, the lies and the deceit of the political party in power and thought, misleadingly, that never ever could he become vulnerable and insecure - like others.]
A gentleman that accompanied the vulnerable tenant said that he felt Mr Coleman would suffer a stroke which would never ever leave him - no matter what he may do. Ironically, just weeks later, it was reported in the newspapers that Mr Iain COLEMAN MP sustained a stroke (otherwise known as a Cardio Vascular Accident or CVA).
Lord Tom SAWYER - the Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust until the end of last year when the ex head of UNISON Union was discredited by the actions of his good friend and colleague the Chief Executive and Labour party member - Peter REDMAN - when 45 highly desirable and very expensive flats earmarked for vulnerable tenants and located in some of the most expensive areas in west London that belonged to the Trust were described after an informer pointed out their 'loss' that millions of pounds worth of valuable property just 'went missing' from the portfolio of the 18,000 properties of the charitable trust. {Such a plundering of high value assets of the Trust was never ever described by Lord Tom SAWYER or Peter REDMAN as FRAUD or THEFT or BREACH of TRUST or CORRUPTION}
Peter REDMAN, the Labour friend of CLIVE SOLEY MP was given a substantial termination payment by Lord Tom Sawyer out of funds from the charitable trust and matters have now appeared to carry on as normal under the authority of Gerard LEMOS as Chairman and Kate DAVIES as Chief Executive. It is clear that the latter continues to be a great supporter of the discredited Lord Tom SAWYER.
With the support of CLIVE SOLEY MP no action was ever taken against the Chief Executive of the housing association - Peter REDMAN - nor even against the Chairman of the Trust, Lord Tom SAWYER. Whilst Peter REDMAN was awarded a substantial payment on departure from his fellow Labour party friend, Lord Tom SAWYER, Lord SAWYER appeared to make a bolt for it from the Housing Trust earlier than he had previously planned, as Tom SAWYER ensured placing his protege Labour party member Gerard LEMOS as chairman and replacement.
Mr Gerard LEMOS was the ex Commissioner of the Audit Commission that delivered a report of poor management performance against the Trust before Lord Tom Sawyer hurriedly departed as chairman. Mr LEMOS as new chairman of the Trust had been a member of the British Council and he had been sponsored heavily by Lord SAWYER out of Notting Hill Housing Trust funds in order to write up a project setting out the policies that will be adopted by the Trust to introduce more affordable housing in a biased way ['Urban Village Global City: Colville' - it talks at length of harassment but it carefully ignores the far more important aspect of harassment orchestrated by the management actions from agents of the Trust (as orchestrated by specific senior management of the Trust)].
The Trust will build 'social (affordable) housing' throughout London, but drawing on central government funds which means that very much more money and very many more houses will be ringfenced for people claiming asylum and for those who argue they are one parent families - even though they continue to live with their partner. Indigenous people will be placed at the lowest level on any housing allocation list.
Now with no more council housing programme, the local authority looks to the housing association housing stock for their housing provision. Some 75% of housing association housing stock must be allocated to the local authority housing department and this compromises the actions of the local authorities against housing associations to comply with unlawful actions - such as overcrowding, the non enforcement of health and safety regulations, the inability to secure independent legal services from the local law centre that is part financed by the local authority, the inability to enforce rodent infestation breaches in housing association properties or to adequately deal with noisy or nuisance neighbours that have been purposely placed there by the landlords in order to try to get good tenants to quit their properties, together with neighbours that are increasingly being placed in communities that are no longer supporting communities.
Yet it appears that discreditable conduct and more by Peter Redman and Lord Tom SAWYER seems to be rewarded by appointments to other Housing Associations and specifically to Chancellorship of Teesside University - in the case of the latest Labour reward and preferment - to the discredited Lord Tom SAWYER.
Not unlike the return of Peter MANDELSON - Peter REDMAN has been twice discredited - he is seconded to run the Labour general election campaign, starting from 5 May 2005.
The forthcoming Labour campaign is going to be very dirty. It will attack the constituents of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush, those who are identified as minorities and anyone who is seen to be vulnerable.
CLIVE SOLEY MP has certainly not supported his constituents - particularly if they are or were tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust and he has just continued to abuse such people, be they male, female, black, white, Asian, Muslim, Christian or just plain vulnerable constituents of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush.
MPs have a duty to support their constituents if they are in a position of vulnerability.
Yet CLIVE SOLEY MP has been noted by his abuse of power.
He has supported the powerful and he has attacked the powerless. Just as he automatically supported the prime minister to gain favour and attacked rather than supported the back bench Labour MPs as chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party.
These are the last days for an MP who was one of the worst Members of Parliament that appears to have selfishly served himself and not his constituents in the House of Commons.
It will be understandable that those who truly know his selfish ambition will pay no respect to him on his passing.
They will, however, remember a truly evil wicked monster - CLIVE STAFFORD SOLEY MP.
CLIVE SOLEY MP has waged a very dirty campaign supporting his Labour friends that run Notting Hill Housing Trust against all the vulnerable tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Including all his very vulnerable constituents of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush.
Iain Coleman MP, the MP for Hammersmith and wife of Dame Sally Powell [sister of Jonathan Powell, the chief of Staff of Tony Blair MP and brother of Thatcher's favourite PR man Charles Powell. He was paid £120,000 and was one of the driving forces behind the decision that one of the quickest ways to show that the Labour Party was pro-business was to take funding from business. Another of his brothers, Chris Powell, was Managing Director of BMP DDB Needham, the Labour Party's advertising agency for the 1997 election] a member of Labour's National Executive was found by POLICE in Harley Street last week hunched over the whel of her red TOYOTA rocking backwards and forwards totally drunk with the key which she had already turned in the ignition. She was found with 61 micrograms of alcohol in 100 milliltres of breath - way over the 35 micrograms limit.
Although she pleaded GUILTY at Horseferry Road Magistrates COurt on 3 February 2005 to being drunk in charge of a vehicle, she received nothing more than an £800 fine, £250 costs and 10 points on her licence.
The judge - perhaps thinking in terms of the possibility of promotion within the legal hierarchy - decided there were 'special reasons' for Sally POWELL to be allowed to continue driving. [Arguing that she was the only person available to drive him to hospital for treatment - but what of her responsibilities as a Labour Councillor?]
On 21 January 2005, Sally POWELL welcomed extending licensing hours. She said it was a good idea that responsible councillors such as herself should take over licensing powers. Yet a ban or custodial sentence is usual in such cases where a driver is found with a high alcoholic content in their blood.
Does it not appear there is one law for some and another for the rest of us?
With the senior Labour party official who helped bring forward plans for longer pub opening - Dame Sally POWELL - was found drunk at the wheel of her car.
Returning to tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust, one of the vulnerable tenants of the Trust went to try to seek the help of Iain COLEMAN MP at the House of Commons - but the MP made it very very clear that he was not prepared to help - even though he was sought out and personally summoned from the Chamber of the House of Commons to the Central Lobby. [Perhaps the MP believed the spin, the lies and the deceit of the political party in power and thought, misleadingly, that never ever could he become vulnerable and insecure - like others.]
A gentleman that accompanied the vulnerable tenant said that he felt Mr Coleman would suffer a stroke which would never ever leave him - no matter what he may do. Ironically, just weeks later, it was reported in the newspapers that Mr Iain COLEMAN MP sustained a stroke (otherwise known as a Cardio Vascular Accident or CVA).
Lord Tom SAWYER - the Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust until the end of last year when the ex head of UNISON Union was discredited by the actions of his good friend and colleague the Chief Executive and Labour party member - Peter REDMAN - when 45 highly desirable and very expensive flats earmarked for vulnerable tenants and located in some of the most expensive areas in west London that belonged to the Trust were described after an informer pointed out their 'loss' that millions of pounds worth of valuable property just 'went missing' from the portfolio of the 18,000 properties of the charitable trust. {Such a plundering of high value assets of the Trust was never ever described by Lord Tom SAWYER or Peter REDMAN as FRAUD or THEFT or BREACH of TRUST or CORRUPTION}
Peter REDMAN, the Labour friend of CLIVE SOLEY MP was given a substantial termination payment by Lord Tom Sawyer out of funds from the charitable trust and matters have now appeared to carry on as normal under the authority of Gerard LEMOS as Chairman and Kate DAVIES as Chief Executive. It is clear that the latter continues to be a great supporter of the discredited Lord Tom SAWYER.
With the support of CLIVE SOLEY MP no action was ever taken against the Chief Executive of the housing association - Peter REDMAN - nor even against the Chairman of the Trust, Lord Tom SAWYER. Whilst Peter REDMAN was awarded a substantial payment on departure from his fellow Labour party friend, Lord Tom SAWYER, Lord SAWYER appeared to make a bolt for it from the Housing Trust earlier than he had previously planned, as Tom SAWYER ensured placing his protege Labour party member Gerard LEMOS as chairman and replacement.
Mr Gerard LEMOS was the ex Commissioner of the Audit Commission that delivered a report of poor management performance against the Trust before Lord Tom Sawyer hurriedly departed as chairman. Mr LEMOS as new chairman of the Trust had been a member of the British Council and he had been sponsored heavily by Lord SAWYER out of Notting Hill Housing Trust funds in order to write up a project setting out the policies that will be adopted by the Trust to introduce more affordable housing in a biased way ['Urban Village Global City: Colville' - it talks at length of harassment but it carefully ignores the far more important aspect of harassment orchestrated by the management actions from agents of the Trust (as orchestrated by specific senior management of the Trust)].
The Trust will build 'social (affordable) housing' throughout London, but drawing on central government funds which means that very much more money and very many more houses will be ringfenced for people claiming asylum and for those who argue they are one parent families - even though they continue to live with their partner. Indigenous people will be placed at the lowest level on any housing allocation list.
Now with no more council housing programme, the local authority looks to the housing association housing stock for their housing provision. Some 75% of housing association housing stock must be allocated to the local authority housing department and this compromises the actions of the local authorities against housing associations to comply with unlawful actions - such as overcrowding, the non enforcement of health and safety regulations, the inability to secure independent legal services from the local law centre that is part financed by the local authority, the inability to enforce rodent infestation breaches in housing association properties or to adequately deal with noisy or nuisance neighbours that have been purposely placed there by the landlords in order to try to get good tenants to quit their properties, together with neighbours that are increasingly being placed in communities that are no longer supporting communities.
Yet it appears that discreditable conduct and more by Peter Redman and Lord Tom SAWYER seems to be rewarded by appointments to other Housing Associations and specifically to Chancellorship of Teesside University - in the case of the latest Labour reward and preferment - to the discredited Lord Tom SAWYER.
Not unlike the return of Peter MANDELSON - Peter REDMAN has been twice discredited - he is seconded to run the Labour general election campaign, starting from 5 May 2005.
The forthcoming Labour campaign is going to be very dirty. It will attack the constituents of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush, those who are identified as minorities and anyone who is seen to be vulnerable.
CLIVE SOLEY MP has certainly not supported his constituents - particularly if they are or were tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust and he has just continued to abuse such people, be they male, female, black, white, Asian, Muslim, Christian or just plain vulnerable constituents of Ealing, Acton and Shepherds Bush.
MPs have a duty to support their constituents if they are in a position of vulnerability.
Yet CLIVE SOLEY MP has been noted by his abuse of power.
He has supported the powerful and he has attacked the powerless. Just as he automatically supported the prime minister to gain favour and attacked rather than supported the back bench Labour MPs as chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party.
These are the last days for an MP who was one of the worst Members of Parliament that appears to have selfishly served himself and not his constituents in the House of Commons.
It will be understandable that those who truly know his selfish ambition will pay no respect to him on his passing.
They will, however, remember a truly evil wicked monster - CLIVE STAFFORD SOLEY MP.
b.jones
Comments
Hide the following 32 comments
Questions
08.04.2005 08:21
Sebastian
update on notting hill housing trust
12.04.2005 03:24
Confirmation: Hammersmith & Fulham Conservatives, 4 Greyhound Road, London, W6 8NX
Many Notting Hill Housing Trust tenants have complained, many live in fear and many are being intimidated by the tactics of their landlords who are known to take advantage of the very close political links at the highest level that dovetail with those in control of the local authorities. If necessary, CCTV is erected, a police presence has been known to be employed or a council security detail to shadow a targeted tenant and for particular management to threaten the tenant as being anti social. Once isolated, to engineer Anti Social Behaviour Orders against their quarry.
With landlords using tactics as these - who can blame the tenants to say they live in a state of attack from the hostile policies of their landlords, leaving their tenants feeling very insecure.
Seems that Anti Social Behaviour Orders should be imposed on the management responsible for such behaviour at Notting Hill Housing Trust?
As more Notting Hill Housing Trust tenants complain, all Notting Hill Housing Tenants are invited to now add their complaints in confidence to the list of tenant complainants at the web address:
john smith
e-mail:
www.john_smith_mail@hotmail.com
Homepage:
http://www.john_smth_mail@hotmail.com
ABUSE BY NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST LANDLORDS
12.04.2005 20:09
Verification: HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM CONSERVATIVES, 4 GREYHOUND ROAD, LONDON W6 8NX
As more complaints have been received from tenants of the trust against the landlords,
new complaints need to be sent to:
posted:
withheld due to intimidation by landlords
Notting Hill Housing Trust
13.04.2005 16:10
Sebastian Kornhauser
e-mail:
frontfire@yahoo.com
Lack of Transparency In regulation
13.04.2005 17:47
Sebastian Kornhauser
Housing Corporation
13.04.2005 18:24
Sebastian Kornhauser
e-mail:
frontfire@yahoo.com
Appeal For Information
13.04.2005 19:18
Sebastian Kornhauser
e-mail:
frontfire@yahoo.com
Cross reference of Facts
13.04.2005 22:11
Source: The Guardian Newspaper.
"An influencial committee of MPs has attacked the Housing corporation for failing to prevent a £1.5 million in one of the country's largest housing associations, despite six early warnings. Two former employees of a housing association and a property dealer were jailed over bribes in connection to the purchase of 47 houses houses between 1991 and 1995, many at inflated prices. The fraud eventually cost the housing association £1.5 million which has mostly been borne by the association's tenants. In a report, the Commons public accounts committee mentioned that the losses could have been reduced or avoided altogether if the housing association and the housing corporation had acted earlier. It also criticised the way the investigation was handled and attacked the corporation for blocking a separate national audit Office investigation into the case. The report points out that between them the housing association and the corporation had been warned of impropriety six times before action was taken. The report says the way the Corporation inspected the case "fell below the standards expected of a regulator". It says allegations of impropriety were handled in an "unsystematic and informal way" The fraud investigation has also become a key battle in a turf war between the Housing Corporation and the national audit office over access to housing association's files. As parliaments spending watchdog the national audit office was asked to investigate the way the corporation supervised housing associations in the wake of the fraud allegations. The national audit office was only given access by the corporation six months after the first request was made. Recommendations have been made by the Commons Public Accounts Committee that the Housing Corproation should ensure that all allegations of impropriety, corruption and fraud are to be taken seriously and investigated".
This is the tip of the ice berg of Britain's silent housing industry which unfortunatley consists property fraud and impropriety. Hence the reason why systematic abuse of social housing tenants takes place by housing associations such as that by Notting Hill Housing Trust.
Sebastian Kornhauser
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ABUSE BY LANDLORDS
14.04.2005 23:42
IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT SALLY POWELL WAS FOUND DRUNK IN CHARGE OF HER CAR IN CENTRAL LONDON.
j.smith
Legal Efforts To Silence Me
15.04.2005 02:18
Chapter 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union which Britain signed at the Treaty of Rome in October 2003 states under article 11 that "Everyone has the Right to Freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by any public authority and regardless of frontiers".
The Order from the Central London County Court does not state an expiry date. Therefore under English law it is in force for one year (12 months). Notting Hill Housing Trust would need to prove before a court of law that what I say is "unfounded".
I am accusing the Notting Hill Housing Trust of systematic and wholesale intimidation, harrassment, bullying, severe disrepair to property, neglect, negligence, institutional discrimination towards social housing tenants, gross misconduct and inhumanity towards people in need. It will be impossible for Notting Hill Housing Trust to prove to a court of law that what I say is unfounded for I will ask for help from tenants who have been wronged by NHHT to come to court on the day to tell the court of their own experiences.
Sebastian Kornhauser
e-mail:
frontfire@yahoo.com
Observation
15.04.2005 03:14
Sebastian Kornhauser
ABUSE BY NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TENANTS
15.04.2005 20:52
john smith
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST ABUSE BY MANAGEMENT
16.04.2005 00:34
Is this known as drunk with the abuse of power?
dave brown
CLIVE SOLEY TENDED TO ABUSE NEVER TO ASSIST
16.04.2005 17:38
Instead of dealing with the day-to-day issues affecting its constituency, underhand tactics are employed to avoid responsibility - rather, target legitimate complainants.
ted makin
Rent Discrepancies at Notting Hill
17.04.2005 19:10
In its letter to attempt to confuse me, Notting Hill Housing Trust states that my rent is regulated by government regulations as to how much rent NHHT can charge me. They rely on the provisions of the ODPM Rent Restructuring Review of 2001.
I have a copy of the Government rent Restructuring Review of 2001. It states clearly that smaller properties should be charged lower rent. This is on record. So therefore it is binding for Notting Hill Housing Trust to follow the provisions they are committing themselves to.
I know that Notting Hill Housing Trust are deceiving me. In this case, Vincent Thomas the director of Customer Accounts at Notting Hill Housing is a liar. Notting Hill Housing Trust knows my property is smaller in size than another property yet is charged less rent. I support what I say with evidence to ensure that what I say is founded. This manipulation and lack of transparency towards social housing tenants is the only method which ensures NHHT is in a position to levy rip off rent subtely and get away with it. These people at Notting Hill Housing must really believe that social housing tenants will just take their word for it. I am not oblivious of my rights.
Sebastian Kornhauser
Politics of the trust?
18.04.2005 20:10
jackie taylor
Housing Associations
19.04.2005 19:15
Simon Bishop
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - POLITICS OF THE TRUST
04.02.2007 11:51
As a member of the Labour Party she prefers to confront not consult
jackie taylor
jackie taylor
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - HARASSMENT
04.02.2007 13:23
Labour Party MP Clive Soley of 24 Birch Grove, Ealing Common, west London was chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party and got all Labour MPs to vote for the war in Iraq. If not, he made it clear of the alternative... the sack... dismissal...
Labour Party Tom Sawyer was ex Chairman of the Labour Party. Tony Blair appointed him as Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust in 1998. Allocate houses and flats for the vote.
Tony Blair as head of the Labour Party gave the two terrible twins, Soley and Sawyer, a Labour party P or peerage. Just as he did with Michael Abraham Levy of Chase House, Nan Clark's Lane, Mill Hill, north London. Did he turn 'water into wine'? No, but he did turn what would have been 'declared donations' into secret, concealed, unaccountable 'lucrative loans'...secret from the committee that vets peerages submitted by Tony Blair.
Guess who Tony Blair wants to take the rap for the cash-for-honours scandal???
Surely not 'Lord Cashpoint' ?
Labour Councillor Sally Powell of Hammersmith & Fulham Council, married to Labour Party Iain Coleman, ex Labour MP of Hammersmith & Fulham, who sustained an irreversible stroke - his specialist in Harley Street called it a Cardio-Vascular Accident. Sally Powell, the Labour Party 'sex-bomb' was found intoxicated and vulnerable, slumped over the steering wheel of her red Datsun, after her husband visited the Harley Street specialist. She lived at Coverdale Road. She is a member of the National Executive Committee of the Labour Party so no custodial sentence. Tony Blair gave her a Labour Party Dameship.
Sally Powell was a solicitor at Glazer Delmar of Peckham.
As Notting Hill Housing Trust are a well-known 'front' for Labour central government in the Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham, NHHT recommend tenants go to Glazer Delmar Solicitors in Peckham for 'independent' legal advice - Ho Ho Ho - some independence!
Labour Party Privy Councillor Nic Raynsford and the MI6 spooky spook Jonathan Buchanan know NHHT very very well...
Ben Bradshaw, environment minister who enjoys wild wild parties, lives at Sedgeford Road. We know him well. Whereas John Hutton, minister at DWP lives at Aldbourne Road, next to where Islamic Idealist Abu Hamza lived...Ironic really...
delroy
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - SCAM - CONTROLLED INDIRECTLY BY TONY BLAIR
08.02.2007 14:23
The days of Labour are dying
The days of Notting Hill Housing Trust are dying
The days of confrontation are dying
The days of corruption are dying
The days of not caring for the most vulnerable are dying
The days of unconcern for our environment are dying
A change is fast approaching - the dross that are the Labour dictators are to be swept away
The days of the Labour Party bullying dictators of Labour Lords Sawyer, Soley, Levy and other assorted rag, tag and bobtail dysfunctional cowards is fading fast..
Why is it that the most insecure and the most dysfunctional of the Labour Party are the most intolerant and dictatorial - with crazy policies - is that why their policies have betrayed a generation and frittered away ALL the treasures of North Sea Oil?
THE EVIDENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF:
The policies of Norway wisely plans for the long term - it has sensible politicians.
The policies of Britain foolishly thinks only in the short term - it has crazy politians.
The policies of Noway mean investing in its own people.
The policies of Britain mean not investing in its own people.
The policies of Norway mean the state investing in its own pension pot (E 236 Billion).
The policies of Britain mean not investing in its own pension pot (Pensions in crisis).
The policies of Norway mean constitutional stability.
The policies of Britain mean constitutional instability.
The policies and legacy of Norway are a triumph to the world.
The policies and legacy of Britain are a disaster to the world.
The legacy of Norway to be remembered for posterity - run by those of wisdom and stature.
The legacy of Britain to be immediately ignored - run and ruined by a a bunch of crazies.
j. s.
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - INDIRECTLY CONTROLLED BY PRIME MINISTER BLAIR
08.02.2007 15:24
HORRENDOUSLY HORRIFIC HELLISH HOUSING - HQ AT HAMMERSMITH
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST INDIRECTLY CONTROLLED BY TONY BLAIR
DODGY DOSSIERS - DIABOLICAL DISASTERS - DEMENTED DICTATOR
YOU COULDN'T MAKE IT UP!!!
TONY BLAIR - BRITAIN'S DELUDED DEMENTED DICTATOR
TONY BLAIR INDIRECTLY CONTROLS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE FLAGSHIP HOUSING ASSOCIATION CONTROLLED BY LABOUR PARTY
TONY BLAIR WANTS 2 BE THE SPOILER 4 LABOUR TO LOSE 3 MAY 2007
ELECTIONS ON 3 MAY 2007 WILL SEE LABOUR PARTY LOSE BIG TIME
NHHT ALWAYS RELY ON CONFRONTATION TACTICS
WITHOUT BLAIR NHHT WILL BE LOST
BLAIR THE DICTATOR MUST GO
BLAIR IS DYING...
ceri
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - CHARITY - DEM FRIGGERS
08.02.2007 15:28
Me no going dem rasclad Notting Hill Housing Trust - dem lie to all tennant
kingston
kingston
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THE LABOUR PARTY STITCH UP
10.02.2007 17:02
I have now discovered that the manager of my local law centre, called 'Beverly' - she refused to give me her family name - is the very same black woman whose photograph appears as a director of my landlords, notting hill housing trust. I now understand why she deceived me by giving me misleading and totally wrong advice.
I was 'advised' not to take my landlords to court - to my local county court.
I now realise I have to take my landlords to my local county court as my home provided by my landlords is in horrific disrepair. It is not fit for a pig to live in.
What makes me livid, ever since I started making complaints in writing to my landlords, they have been trying to confront me and harass me. How dare they.
I think I should be given my housing trust property and for a group of tenants to manage our homes as our own community. I am not going to be confronted by some alien labour party bitches that want to confront me, thank you.
I have also discovered that the crooked deceitful manager of the law centre is a member of the labour party and advises the labour party and my landlords who are run, organised and managed by the labour party and are informed about what we as tenants of the major housing association are doing to defend our rights.
Avoid the law centre in hammersmith and the 'Beverly' woman like the plague.
I now realise that my landlords have a labour party agenda to stitch us up as tenants.
I shall not be voting for the labour party again, now I have discovered their deceit and corrupt practices.
marge
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - YOU MUST BE JOKING - DO NOT TRUST THEM
10.02.2007 17:16
Labour Lord Tom Sawyer is a good friend of Labour Lord Michael Levy. Both are good friends of discredited Labour leader Tony Blair
Avoid the solicitors the housing trust recommend - in Peckham.
Notting Hill Housing Trust is in Hammersmith, the dodgiest part of London is in Peckham where some of the dodgiest firms of solicitors are based. Peckham is the murder and fraud capital of London.
Why go to a dodgy area of London for solicitors when the major labour flagship housing association is based in the heart of Hammersmith?
Doesn't sound right to me!!!
Go to a dodgy part of london - you get dodgy solicitors.
paul
BLAIR - BLAIR - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - BLAIR - BLAIR
11.02.2007 21:40
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST PILOTS MANY OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL NEW LABOUR PARTY POLICIES
BLAIR - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - PRIME MINISTER BLAIR IS DESTROYING THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST (NHHT) - A CREATURE OF PRIME MINISTER BLAIR
LABOUR PARTY TO 'GERRYMANDER' OR RIG THE VOTE ACROSS BRITAIN - PILOTED UNDER NHHT IN WEST LONDON
BLAIR DESTROYING BRITISH CONSTITUTION - HOUSE OF LORDS TODAY - MONARCHY TOMORROW
92 MEMBERS OF THE HEREDITARIES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS UPPER CHAMBER REMAIN
YET THERE ARE 654 LIFE PEERS - EX BLAIR FLATMATE'S, PARTY DONORS, WASHED- UP MINISTERS, LIKE THE TERRIBLE TWINS OF LABOUR, LABOUR LORD TOM SAWYER AND LABOUR LORD CLIVE SOLEY (BOTH APPOINTED LABOUR LORDS BY LABOUR PRIME MINISTER MR BLAIR) WHO WANTED TO DESTROY THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY, SOLEY GOT ALL LABOUR MPs TO VOTE FOR THE WAR IN IRAQ. IF NOT, CLIVE SOLEY AS A LABOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT (MP) SAID THAT ANY LABOUR MPs WHO DID NOT OBEY HIM - AS CHAIRMAN OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) WOULD BE SACKED, AS THAT WAS WHAT TONY BLAIR THE PRIME MINISTER HAD INSISTED ON. MOST OF THE LIFE PEERS SIT IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS ON THE MERE WHIM OF THE PRIME MINISTER - PAST OR PRESENT.
THE LABOUR PARTY REFORMS ARE A DOG'S BREAKFAST - SERVED UP BY GOVERNMENT THIS WEEK AND A CHANGE NEXT WEEK - NO LONG TERM PLANNING.
BRITAIN IS ALL ABOUT COCK-UPS AND SHORT TERMISM!
WITH THE REFORM OF THE LORDS, ONE THOUSAND YEARS OF BRITISH HISTORY WILL BE CONSIGNED TO THE RUBBISH BIN.
THE OLD SYSTEM WORKED EXTREMELY WELL. IT HAD A MIXTURE OF SPIRITUAL INPUT - THE CHURCH - LEGAL INPUT - SENIOR JUDGES - BUSINESS INPUT - CONSERVATIVE PEERS - COUNTRY INPUT - CONSERVATIVE & LIBERAL PEERS.
OWING SEATS TO BIRTHRIGHT, THE HEREDITARIES WERE BEHOLDEN TO NOBODY - MAKING THEM TRULY INDEPENDENT
PEOPLE OFTEN SPEAK OF THE INBUILT CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY IN THE DAYS WHEN MOST OF THEM WERE HEREDITARY. TRY TELLING THAT TO MARGARET THATCHER OR JOHN MAJOR WHO WERE VOTED DOWN IN THE LORDS MANY HUNDREDS OF TIMES BETWEEN THEM.
THE HEREDITARIES SPOKE UP FOR ECCENTRIC MINORITIES, AS FEW DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED LEGISLATORS WOULD DARE, FOR FEAR OF BEING THOUGHT 'BONKERS' BY THE ELECTORATE. IF LEGISLATION SEEMED UNJUST OR ILL-DRAFTED THEY CHALLENGED THE PARTY LINE WITHOUT FEAR OF THE WHIPS (WHO CONTROL HOW THE POLITICAL PARTY MUST VOTE).
BESIDES, THE HEREDITARIES GAVE A VOICE TO COUNTRY PEOPLE, SO OFTEN TRAMPLED UPON IN A DEMOCRACY IN WHICH THE GREAT MAJORITY OF VOTERS ARE CONCENTRATED IN THE MAJOR CITIES AND TOWNS (LOOK AT THIS GOVERNMENT'S TREATMENT OF RURAL POST OFFICES AND COUNTRY BUS SERVICES AND YOU WILL KNOW WHAT EXACTLY WHAT I MEAN).
TONY BLAIR'S MOTTO IS IF IT'S NOT BROKEN, BREAK IT. HE WAS DETERMINED TO GET RID OF THE HEREDITARIES WHEN HE CAME TO POWER TEN YEARS AGO IN 1997.
BLAIR EVICTED MOST OF THE HEREDITARIES IN 1999 WITHOT A THOUGHT IN HIS HEAD ABOUT WHO OR WHAT SHOULD REPLACE THEM.
THERE WAS A POLITICAL 'STITCH-UP' TO PRESERVE CLUB MEMBERSHIP FOR A FAVOURED FEW. THE SELF-ELECTING ARISTOCRACY IT PRODUCED IS UTTERLY INDEFENSIBLE, WHETHER ON GROUNDS OF SENTIMENT, LOGIC OR EFFECTIVENESS.
THE ONE REMAINING HEREDITARY ELEMENT IN THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE LEFT LOOKING TERRIBLY EXPOSED - THE BRITISH MONARCHY.
A GROWING NUMBER OF LABOUR POLITICIANS ARGUE THAT THE CROWN (i.e. CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY - MEANING THE QUEEN) SHOULD GO THE SAME WAY AS THE HEREDITARY PEERAGE.
BRITISH CONSTITUTIONAL VANDALS?
IN 1997, MR BLAIR THE PRIME MINISTER, TOOK 'AN AXE' TO THE UNION WITH SCOTLAND, THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, AND THE SEPARATION OF THE JUDICIARY, LEGISLATURE AND EXECUTIVE (UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF HIS EX FLAT MATE - LABOUR LORD CHARLES FALCONER).
LABOUR POISONED ENGLAND'S RELATIONS WITH SCOTLAND, POLITICISING THE JUDICIARY AND CIVIL SERVICE AND TREATING PARLIAMENT WITH COMPLETE CONTEMPT.
REGARDING THE MONARCHY...
THERE'S THE ELDEST SON OF THE QUEEN, PRINCE CHARLES, WHO LEADS A LIFE OF HUGE EXTRAVAGENCE, JETTING OFF WITH A VAST ENTOURAGE TO COLLECT AN ENVIRONMENTAL AWARD IN THE UNITED STATES, LEAVING COLOSSAL CARBON FOOTPRINTS ALL OVER THE SKY.
THERE'S THE SECOND ELDEST SON TO PRINCE CHARLES, PRINCE HARRY [OR TO BE MORE TRUTHFUL, THE ELDEST SON TO THE CONSUMMATED LOVE BETWEEN JAMES HEWITT AND HRH PRINCESS DIANA - NO BLOOD TEST WILL EVER BE ALLOWED TO DETERMINE THE TRUE PATERNITY OF HARRY!] WHO IS OFTEN FOUND DRINKING HIMSELF SILLY NIGHT AFTER NIGHT IN 'HOORAY-HENRY' STYLE NIGHTCLUBS [IGNORING THE COCAINE HE OFTEN SMOKES]. THE REASON HE ACTS THIS WAY IS CLEAR - HE HAS BEEN MADE ONLY TOO AWARE OF HIS TRUE PATERNITY - THE HEAVY AND DARK SECRET THAT HARBOURS ANOTHER MAJOR SECRET OF HIS LATE MOTHER - NOT TO BE SPOKEN ABOUT PUBLICLY!!! [CHARLES SPENCER HAS A GOOD REASON WHY HE CANNOT LIVE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM!]
THEN THERE IS THE WOMAN WHO MARRIED THE SECOND SON OF THE QUEEN, KNOWN AS 'FERGIE' [SARAH FERGUSON]. WHO SHAMELESSLY TRADES OFF HER ROYAL CONNECTIONS ON THE FOOLISH US STYLE CHAT-SHOW CIRCUIT. WHAT CAN BE MADE OF HER 18 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER, BEATRICE, GUSHING ON A VIDEO PLAYED TO A 'MOTHER OF THE YEAR' LUNCH IN MANHATTAN: "YOUR LIFE, YOUR LOVE AND YOUR CREATIVITY HAVE BLESSED ME SO MUCH AND BLESSED SO MANY PEOPLE?" [WHAT TOSH!]
WHEN WE'VE ALL FINISHED THROWING UP, THE IMPRESSION IS LEFT OF A SELF-INDULGENT AND DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILY, DRAGGING DOWN THEIR ROYAL NAME AND STRIPPING IT OF ITS MYSTIQUE AS THEY ENJOY ALL THE FAR TOO MANY PRIVILEGES THAT GO WITH IT.
NEXT, THE CONSTITUTION WRECKERS WILL TURN THEIR ATTENTION TO THE HEREDITARY MONARCHY.
AT A TIME WHEN SO MANY OF THE LINKS THAT BIND OUR COUNTRY TOGETHER ARE WEAKENING - THERE ARE LARGE PARTS OF OUR CITIES WHERE YOU WON'T EVEN HEAR ENGLISH SPOKEN - THE MONARCHY REMAINS A UNIFYING FORCE.
CAN YOU IMAGINE A PRESIDENT BLAIR - OR A PRESIDENT THATCHER FOR THAT MATTER - COMMANDING ANYTHING LIKE THE NEAR UNIVERSAL RESPECT AND AFFECTION EARNED BY THE POLITICALLY NEUTRAL QUEEN DURING HER LONG REIGN?
WHAT'S MORE, WOULDN'T YOU HAPPILY BET YOUR LAST PENNY THAT A PRESIDENCY WOULD TURN OUT TO BE TEN TIMES MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE MONARCHY?
THE ROYAL FAMILY MIGHT BE DYSFUNCTIONAL - YES, DARK SECRETS MIGHT LURK IN THE PROGENY OF THE CHILDREN, AND YES, SOME TRADE SHAMELESSLY OFF THEIR ROYAL CONNECTIONS AND TEND TO BE FAR TOO PROFLIGATE.
BUT THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE:
TRANSPARENCY - ACCOUNTABILITY - CONSULTATION - MODERATION
THE SAME SOLUTION NEEDS ADOPTING BY LABOUR GOVERNMENT
yorum ekle
gonderen
politics of the trust
11.02.2007 22:20
Many of the tenants are poor, vulnerable and are not helped by management but invariably harassed horrifically. It is widely understood that she was given a job as political nepotism for being a flag waving member of the labour party and a good friend of those in the senior echelons of the union sector of the labour party. To make sure she ensures political party preferment, she confronts but she has been never known to assist any of the vulnerable tenants at notting hill housing trust. She is a complete disaster as a member of so-called 'management'. It is clear that she would not know how to manage anything let alone the homes of vulnerable people. Most tenants say she is known for her arrogance and confrontation than anything to do with any so-called 'management' housing policy.
Prior to this, the organisation in which she was employed at Servite Housing Association was mainly for assisting lesbian women. Previously, while she was employed as the director of Housing at Brighton & Hove City Council, those around her were involved in doing all the work, she sat back and took all the glory. Most of the people that know her methods are aware that her involvement in politics was the crucial factor that saw her gain promotion.
jackie
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jackie
BLAIR - NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - SCAM - CONTROLLED INDIRECTLY BY TONY BLAIR
12.02.2007 13:24
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know is controlled indirectly by LABOUR PARTY
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know stitch up and harass their best tenants
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know promote confrontational management
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know has badly educated management
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know has directors on the Board that were involved in the WAR on IRAQ {step forward Jonathan Buchanan (MI6 spooky spook)}
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know has directors on the Board that control Law Centres and thereby deceive the good tenants
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know are so irresponsible and unresponsive do not respond to any complaints in writing
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know is based in west london yet surprisingly refer vulnerable tenants to dodgy firms of solicitors based in the murder and deceit centre of london in a place called Peckham in south east london
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know ensures that all its board are flag-waving card carrying commisar members of the labour party
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know is perhaps the most unaccountable housing association in london and in this country - it is controlled managed and orchestrated by senior members of the labour party in a way to gerrymander the vote and house those it believes will vote for the return of a blair elective dictator
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST we know is indirectly controlled by LABOUR leader Mr Blair which is why it is so confrontational in its policies. Its headquarters were deliberately MOVED -
transferred FROM:
1) a LABOUR 'ward' (local political constituency){in All Saints Road, Colville Ward} in the:
2) CONSERVATIVE 'borough' (one of 33 political divisions of london) of Kensingon & Chelsea Borough
TO:
1) a LABOUR 'ward' {at 27 Hammersmith Grove, near King Street, Hammersmith} in:
2) a LABOUR 'borough' of Hammersmith of Fulham. {38 years Labour control} under
central government control which was:
3) a LABOUR 'central government' since 1997 under LABOUR leader Mr Blair.
{1, 2, + 3 mean TOTAL political control of the unaccountable Housing Associations and TOTAL political control over the intelligent tenants who are never consulted, unlike with local authority properties where there is local democratic control though local Councillors of the local Ward which links into the local Borough which is accountable to the local electorate. The Blair unaccountable policy cannot be right - it STINKS of a LABOUR Party Blair ELECTIVE DICTATORSHIP controlled by the unaccountable LABOUR Party in power!
In 1998, LABOUR prime minister Mr Blair (the elective dictator in charge of central government) parachuted the ex LABOUR Party chairman and leader of UNISON union (in charge of central government employees and local government employees - all members of UNISON union - but were all the UNISON union members all stitched-up?) Labour Party member Tom Sawyer (after Mr Blair gave him a LABOUR Party Lordship - in return for 'sorting out' the housing linked to the vote, with unaccountable taxpayers money into the Housing Associations, which would 'sort out' the vote for LABOUR to be re-elected through the provision of unaccountable Housing Association homes which would translate as hundred of thousands of votes from a new immigrant community - all short term policy - meaning the undermining of indigenous people done through stealth - exactly like the stealth taxes introduced by LABOUR Party - which uses political correctness and multi-culturism to deviously and deliberately take away the voice of indigenous people - which uses LABOUR Party commisars to politicise every institution in Britain that had previously been independent of political control - which uses confrontation tactics - the same discredited policies of Notting HIll Housing Trust)
Guess who took over from LABOUR Party parachuted LABOUR Lord Tom Sawyer of 22 Inchmery Road, Catford? LABOUR Party member Gerard Lemos, protege of his mentor Tom Sawyer. The social research of Gerard Lemos were funded out of the unaccountable shed-loads of hundreds upon unaccountable hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers money which led to the discredited LABOUR Party policies based on multicultural experiments using the human guinea pigs living in the street after street of Notting HIll Housing Trust owned managed and controlled properties in the LABOUR Party Colville Ward (many living in Notting Hill Housing Trust properties?), ALL funded by Notting HIll Housing Trust - blatantly breaking british charity law.
LABOUR Party member Gerard Lemos was given all the plaudits, honours and awards the LABOUR Party could bestow. Even the CMG - 'CALL ME GOD' award for being a good supporter of non British culture and thereby putting in place his own 'LABOUR Policy'! Together with appointment as the LABOUR government's Race Adviser and Deputy Chairmanship of the LABOUR Party controlled QUANGO - BRITISH COUNCIL - LABOUR Lord Neil Kinnock being Chairman of the BRITISH COUNCIL, Lemos was made a LABOUR Party Commissioner of the CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION - thereby politicising the CIVIL SERVICE. Lemos was also made LABOUR Party Comissioner of the AUDIT COMMISSION, another unaccountable LABOUR Party QUANGO that oversees the management and 'good running' of all Housing Associations. Lemos lives with his boyfriend Paul Crane at 7 Bisham Gardens at the top of Highgate Hill where his social research department is based in the upstairs office of the green building next to the pond nearby. Based on the guinea pigs of Notting HIll Housing Trust tenants and the Marxist ORwellian Organised Negative (MORON) experiments that took place under loony tune Lemos. What a LOONY legacy!
The Discredited Lemos was last heard of running away to a good red flag waving CHINA, clutching his little red book in hand. That is why Notting Hill Housing Trust have introduced the RED Lotus - the sign of a corrupted and corroded LABOUR Party discredited by lies and deceit, rocked to the core with internal corruption, harassment of tenants, endless complaints, confrontation, discredited solicitors, discredited housing advisers, now wars of conquest, completed by the sinking ship of continuing corruption.
LABOUR MELTDOWN
From poacher [esteemed Rev. bruce Kenrick] to gamekeeper [discredited peter rachman]!
Notting HIll Housing Trust we know use:
C - CONFRONTATION - CONFRONTATION - CONFRONTATION
L - LUNATIC POLICIES TO CONFRONT RESPECTABLE TENANTS
O - ORCHESTRATED FALSE RENT ARREARS
S - SERIOUS DISEPAIR TO NOT REPAIR PROPERTIES, FOR VAST NHHT PROFITS
E - EVICT DELIBERATELY TENANTS TO SELL OFF EXPENSIVE PROPERTIES
D - DISCREDITED TACTICS TO TARGET TENANTS WHO COMPLAIN LEGITIMATELY
O - ORCHESTRATED ILLEGAL INPUTING OF LIES ON COMPUTER DATABASE
W - WALK OVER TENANTS RIGHTS WITH LABOUR FUNDED ADVICE AGENCIES
N - NEVER CARE FOR TENANTS COMPLAINTS IN WRITING
N - NEVER CONSULT TENANTS - USE DODGY 'ONE-POUND SHAREHOLDERS'
H - HARASS ANY INTELLIGENT TENANTS FOR COMPLAINING
H - HANDY LABOUR POLITICIANS TRY TO 'STITCH-UP' GOOD TENANTS
T - TARGET ANY GOOD TENANT WHO LEGITIMATELY COMPLAINS IN WRITING
kat
Notting Hill Housing Trust politics - they're disgustingly evil - like Hitlers
15.02.2007 17:01
The solution is surely simple - come 3 May 2007 - faced with what we all know
What do we want?
LABOUR out
When do we want it?
We'll have it on 3 MAY 2007
NHHT are too stupid to ever know the meaning of Consulting with tenants
madge
notting hill housing trust abuse by management
17.02.2007 17:24
Yet it seems to be in line with the Labour Party tactics of confrontation and unaccountability never consultation.
mark
notting hill housing trust confrontation
17.02.2007 17:38
Not too many landlords stoop so law.
sab
Notting Hill Housing Trust confrontation
18.02.2007 21:14
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST tenant here you are - for complaining!
they revel in confronting their tenants if a tenant complains in writing, out of control, that's what they are.
scot
My MP deliberately sentenced my Islamic relatives to die in Iraq
01.03.2007 17:41
Maybe the old man should go back to his northern Ireland and leave England alone?
He said that if any of the other Labour MPs were to vote against his decision as chairman of the Labour Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) vote against the war to destroy Iraq back to the stone age the Labour Party MP would have to resign. This decision came from Labour Party prime minister Mr Tony Blair who is soon to leave after he betrayed our people. Yet he wants to live amongst our brethren at Connaught Square off Edgware Road at Marble Arch.
Seems like one - Soley - is a traitor to northern Ireland?
Seems like the other - Blair - is a traitor to Scotland?
hamdin