Is Syria Next?
un | 18.01.2005 15:12 | Anti-militarism | Repression
Once again the disinformation is being spread, that Syria is where the terrorists are coming from, that Syria is harbouring terrorist training camps, that Syria is supporting insurgents in Iraq.
Is Sryia Next?
According to the Washington Times ( http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050111-105709-6329r.htm) the Bush Nazi Family ( http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bushnonazi.html) are considering strikes into Syria 'to bolster security for the upcoming elections'.
A more likely explanation however, is that it will divert attention from a rigged election ( http://www.voices.netuxo.co.uk/library/briefing_020804.html), and from its failure in Fallujah ( http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL18Ak04.html), and its mounting record of War Crimes, and Crimes Against Humanity, and Acts Of Genocide, as defined by articles 5-8 of The ICC ( http://www.un.org/law/icc/statute/romefra.htm)
http://www.counterpunch.org/boyle11152004.html
http://www.lawyersagainstthewar.org/
http://www.counterpunch.org/sengupta11232004.html
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/19/1524257
http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/14549_Fallujah.html
Syria tried so hard as well, to help america by providing american intelligence with 'hundreds of files on Al Qaeda, crucial data on the activities of radical Islamist cells throughout the Middle East and Europe and intelligence about future terrorist plans.' ( http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031103&s=editors), and offered to let american troops stay on Syrian soil, and they have been repaid by almost continuose threats of violence.
According to the Washington Times ( http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050111-105709-6329r.htm) the Bush Nazi Family ( http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bushnonazi.html) are considering strikes into Syria 'to bolster security for the upcoming elections'.
A more likely explanation however, is that it will divert attention from a rigged election ( http://www.voices.netuxo.co.uk/library/briefing_020804.html), and from its failure in Fallujah ( http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL18Ak04.html), and its mounting record of War Crimes, and Crimes Against Humanity, and Acts Of Genocide, as defined by articles 5-8 of The ICC ( http://www.un.org/law/icc/statute/romefra.htm)
http://www.counterpunch.org/boyle11152004.html
http://www.lawyersagainstthewar.org/
http://www.counterpunch.org/sengupta11232004.html
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/19/1524257
http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/14549_Fallujah.html
Syria tried so hard as well, to help america by providing american intelligence with 'hundreds of files on Al Qaeda, crucial data on the activities of radical Islamist cells throughout the Middle East and Europe and intelligence about future terrorist plans.' ( http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20031103&s=editors), and offered to let american troops stay on Syrian soil, and they have been repaid by almost continuose threats of violence.
un
Comments
Hide the following 9 comments
Yes, but if ?
18.01.2005 18:41
What should the world community do -
Impose sanctions on Syria ?
Organise a UN led invasion ?
Apply 'Diplomatic Pressure' ?
Nothing ?
Assad
IF
18.01.2005 21:26
Just a thought...maybe you think I'm extreme ;)
Djinn
Not Extreme
19.01.2005 12:43
Lisa
No Lisa - you are the child
19.01.2005 17:27
Haidar
Your view is cleqr
19.01.2005 18:33
Thanks for clearing that up - what will be your rallying cry -
"Power to the People - as long as they're not Syrian"
Lisa
"Lisa" & "Assad" are the same zionist spook
19.01.2005 22:27
"the Syrian regime (also a B'athist Party)" - COMPLETLY DIFFERENT FROM THE "BATHIST" PARTY THAT RULED IRAQ (WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE USA). They acutally hated each other you moron. But you just play with words to confuse the Sun reading moron who take your zionist lies seriously, don't you?
"is supporting the remnants of the Saddam regime in Iraq" - say a bunch of Mossad agents and no one else ... got any proof? Is it like the WMD "proof"?
"Impose sanctions on Syria ?" - NO! Impose them on the only "state" in the Middle East with PROVEN WMDs and PROVEN nukes - the zionist entity knows as "israel".
"Organise a UN led invasion ?" - NO! We must invade Occupied Palestine to take it back from the ILLEGAL OCCUPIERS (the zionists). They are the ones in breach of MORE UN RESOLUTIONS THAN ANY OTHER NATION ON EARTH.
The "chatter" about an attack on Syria is zionist neocon propaganda - WE WILL DESTROY ALL AMERICANAZIS AND ZIONISTS IF THESE ILLEGAL ATTACKS ON NATIONS CONTINUE.
AND WE SHOULD ENCOURAGE SYRIA TO GET NUKES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO DEFEND THEM FROM AN ILLEGAL ATTACK BY THE IMPERIALIST CRUSADERS. GOOD LUCK SYRIA - SLAUGHTER THE INVADER SCUM WHEN THE ATTACK YOUR INNOCENT PEOPLE.
Angry Manc
e-mail: angry_manc@hotmail.com
My view is clear – but obviously not to Lisa
20.01.2005 11:12
Do you think it is possible that the relatives of the 10,000’s of Iraqi people that have been killed by US forces may have an axe to grind about the occupation?
Haidar
Lisa
20.01.2005 13:49
Haidar
My view is clear
20.01.2005 14:31
Ah, but THOSE despots are our FRIENDS. Our despotic allies in the war against terror.
Syria may not have a perfect government. But when you compare it to some of our friends in the region...Israel, Saudi Arabia...well, I don't see much comparison. The biggest criticism of Syria is what they did to the town of Hama, in the previous presidents reign, when it destroyed the city centre to defeat an uprising of militant muslims. But I don't think the US can complain now, seeing as it has done EXACTLY THE SAME THING in Fallujah.
And Hama happened a long time ago, under a different regime, so if you don't bring up Hama, well, I won't bring up the even greater massacre the US committed in Vietnam.
I'd be interested to know, now, exactly who commits more torture. The US or Syria. Certainly, the US is commiting a much greater amount of murder and political repression at the moment.
I find the dialogue about Syria so hypocritical by the US. It does not support democracy. In fact, it overthrows democracries ( see Haiti...also see the attempt in Venezuela ), and it supports despots. It has been in far more wars than any other country, has killed many many more people.
Actually, the most hypocritical is the US dialogue on Cuba. 'oooo, Cuba is so bad because it imprisons dissidents'. The US is detaining hundreds of people, WITHOUT CHARGE OR TRIAL. And not only that, it is torturing many of them.
WHAT A HYPOCRITE YOU ARE TO SUPPORT UNITED STATES REPRESSION AND TORTURE IN THE NAME OF FIGHTING REPRESSION AND TORTURE.
Victory to the Resistance.
Djinn