Skip to content or view screen version

Pants on Fire!

The Thinker | 10.02.2004 22:32 | Anti-militarism

"We don't know what we thought..." - George W Bush, commenting on Iraq's non-existent WMD's.

After over a decade of crippling sanctions and Desert Storm, Saddam Hussein was ordered to give UN weapons inspectors access to sensitive facilities... he did, and nothing was discovered. The regime also disclosed its weapons programs in an extensive 12,000 page dossier, which named the corporations from the US, UK, Germany, France and China who had supplied them with materials and equipment to develop biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, but this information was censored. Iraq was then given an ultimatum to disarm in accordance with Resolution 1441 or face conflict with the Nations who armed it. In response, they destroyed their remaining al-Samoud 2 missile system and allowed military scientists to be interviewed by the inspectors, a key demand.



Despite this and Scott Ritter’s revelations that Iraq was already neutered, or the general consensus that containment was working, Hussein’s compliance was dismissed by the War Party as a cynical attempt to buy more time, and he was accused of deceit. Bush, Blair, Rumsfeld, Straw, Hoon, Powell, Rice, Cheney, Howard and others, continued to insist that Iraq threatened world stability with weapons of mass destruction and confrontation was paramount because “time was running out!” But if, as President Bush has now stated, it was never claimed that Hussein was an “imminent threat” and as George Tenet said, he only hoped for a nuclear weapon, then why was ‘Shock & Awe’ necessary?



Had Hans Blix and his team been given more time - just one more year, it would have eventually come to light, as it did to David Kay, that Iraq did not possess WMD’s with the capacity to threaten it’s neighbours, (Israel) far less America or Britain, after all, they couldn’t even successfully invade Kuwait! So, war and the ensuing chaos could have been averted by diplomacy and an apology or resignations will not suffice, but with the main protagonist, Saddam Hussein now in custody, the location of any concealed weapons which may supply terrorist networks, should have been coerced from the ‘horse’s mouth’ – the alleged Taliban conscripts in Guantanamo Bay are interrogated for less and unlike the despot of Iraq, denied basic human rights and PoW status.



Since the weapons which could be activated in 45 minutes have failed to materialize, not even in retaliation after the outbreak of war, it is not Iraq who has undermined the ineffectual UN and defied International Law, but the corrupt politicians who engaged our servicemen and women in an illegal invasion of that country, justified by “dramatised” intelligence. Those who attempted to inform the public of this fact, paid with their jobs, or like Dr. David Kelly... their life. To distract people from their flagrant war crimes, the guilty keep the media embroiled in contrived inquiries which evade the real issues and treat critical political decisions as an ongoing “learning process.”



World Leaders who lent their support to the Coalition share collective responsibility for crimes against humanity, namely; the unlawful detention of combatants without trial, the use of depleted uranium and wilful ruination of infrastructure, the plunder of resources and needless death of 10,000 innocent Iraqi civilians and 600 duped troops. If that is not enough to expose our fraudulent democracy and convince the populace to run these pathological liars and murderers out of office before they commit further genocide, what will? These dangerous ‘Dark Forces’ should not be permitted to implement another single domestic policy on our behalf, or given a podium to voice an opinion on any matter concerning global security. And no, the reaction should not be a clamour for World Government as the solution... that is the problem.




The Thinker

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Infighting

11.02.2004 02:48

The important thing is that Kerry (John) is a Skull and Bonesman - part of the same lifelong club as Bush, and can therefore be entrusted with the agenda
It's like vs like. That's why he's moved centre stage
Interesting that "kittens" is a term for the establishment's sex slaves, atomic would indicate especially satisfying ones
Quite right that the other Kerry should also get the compliant public's vote


Blood brothers

or rather, bones brothers

 http://www.prisonplanet.com/020904presidentquizzed.html

 http://www.prisonplanet.com/010104kerryadmits.html



dh


Allow for some complexity, DH

11.02.2004 09:38

DH, membership of an institution may suggest a likely pattern of behaviour on the part of an individual, but it is not a good guide to who they are or what they will do. In this country Oxbridge produces people like Blair, Hutton, and John Scarlett. But it has also produced armies of people on the left. Similarly there are Freemasons who are Queen and Church, and there are others who are right of man, radical equality revolutionaries--- your Prince Philips on the one hand, and your Jose Martis on the other. There are Rhodes Scholars like Bill Clinton, and there are others like Bram Fischer the great South African Communist Party/ African National Congress martyr. The same is true about elite places in America like Harvard and Yale-- there are traditions of authority figures, and there are traditions of dissenters. Of these things I speak from experience. Individuals do not stay in one place, and those with integrity and courage will learn to betray any corrupt institutions they may have been inducted into.

At the age of 21, in his last year as an undergraduate at Yale, Kerry spent one year as a member of a student society called Skull and Bones. It is a very unusual society, to which many powerful people in America have belonged. It is a favourite object of conspiracy theory because, it is true that a conservative network of bankers, media people, intelligence people, and politicians has grown out of Bones. But not all Bonesmen will belong to it, and that network, by virtue of the shared policy and material interests of those involved would have emerged without the help of Skull and Bones.

Kerry is certainly no threat to capitalism: scion of wealthy Bostonians, independently wealthy, married to a multimillionairess. But it is not complex enough thinking to assume that because he passed through Bones, that he will simply represent continuity with another GWB (bonesman himself, son of bonesman, grandson of bonesman). Far more significant in understanding Kerry, in my view, than his nine months in New Haven as a Bonesman, is the several year period he spent as a key leader and organizer of Vietnam Veterans against the War. The courage he demonstrated at the time as a dissenting political leader, at risk to himself, given that this was a time when the FBI was at war with the anti-war movement. He has the potential to be a FDR figure. At worst he is unlikely to be as antiworker, anti-environment, warmongering as Bush.

karmamonger


Excuse me?

11.02.2004 11:01

Kerry is a millionaire initiate of a long established cult called the 'Brotherhood of Death' which is so secret he cannot talk about it, whose emblem is the "Jolly Roger" - the same Skull and Crossbones that pirates of yore, who raped, pillaged and plundered their way across the High Seas flew from their mast - and you think he could be trusted to reverse the trend of previous Bonesmen, to plunge us into a militarised New World Order?

Miaaaw


Hey don't knock the pirates

11.02.2004 14:28

The "pirates of yore", at least according to some historians (see eg. Marcus Rediker, THE MANY HEADED HYDRA) were in many cases anarchist communities escaping from the slave-naval-plantation-prison system of the 17th c. So 'Skull and Crossbones' can just celebrate the recognition of mortality rather than being a death cult.

As for Kerry and Skull and Bones, if you really do believe that institutions have this homogenizing effect, and lifelong hold, over those who pass through them, then you really don't have a very optimistic view of history.

If NWO is to be disrupted, we will need the help of insiders who decide to work against. No revolution works without class traitors.

Which reminds me of the old joke about Kruschev and Chou en Lai having a set to at a conference in the 1950s-- Kruschev says to Chou: "You are a bourgeois lickspittle, we have nothing in common!", to which Chou responds, "Excuse me Comrade, but I think we do have something in common: we both betrayed our class"!

Long John Kropotkin