Skip to content or view screen version

“Oh look, another Hutton Whitewash. We paid for your war with our education”

Mark Wood | 28.01.2004 15:49 | Analysis | London | World

“Oh look, a another Hutton Whitewash. We paid for your war with our education”

So the hutton report was a whitewash and let Blair off the hook, as most of us have come to expect from the establishment looking after its own.
Don't trust the Sun, especially after Blair's faustion deal with Murdock before Blair came to power and Murdock got his media deals.

“Oh look, a another Hutton Whitewash. We paid for your war with our education”

So the hutton report was a whitewash and let Blair off the hook, as most of us have come to expect from the establishment looking after its own.
Don't trust the Sun, especially after Blair's faustion deal with Murdock before Blair came to power and Murdock got his media deals.

As regard to the recent education fiasco, Bradley and Brown are New Labours Trojan horse's sent in to foster a channel for rebellion, only to betray them not only at the last moment, but in a multiple strategy, first Bradley with his compromises, leading to agreement with the government, and then Browns devastating change of direction at the end, all planned from the beginning, just look at the connections, PPS to agriculture, voting record, Bradley's dissent in parliamentary history is minuscule.
Enough said, they are both a pair of scoundrels, who sold down the original ideas that are the inspiration for what we now call the Labour Movement, down the river!

What’s the difference between CNN, FOX, SKY, BBC, New Labour, and the Tory’s?
Answer NONE! they all put the vested interests first, and all conspire against the population, giving our collective wealth, to the highest bidder.

What G.W.Bush and T.Blair, have done is both immoral and illegal, may future generations judge them for their actions, and learn a valuable lesson for the sake of humanity it self.

Bush and Blair the evil pair! And Hutton just repeats history and sold us all down the river just like he did before with Ireland.

We will not forget or forgive you for this destruction of democracy, and vow to join with others to expose this terrible state of affairs.

“We paid for your war with our education, WE DONT TRUST ANY OF YOU ANY MORE”

Mark Wood.
Wellington, Shropshire.

Mark Wood
- e-mail: marky_ace@yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://www.vividimage.enta.net/foi

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Scam dressed as Hutton

28.01.2004 16:17



Whatever did you expect ? Why d'you think Hutton was chosen in the first place ?

The whole thing was a charade from the beginning.

Also to get a reason to rein in the Beeb (that well known hive of revolutionaries-Lol.)
BeebSKYBeeb on the cards ??

GL


Surprise, surprise!

28.01.2004 16:24

"Government In 'Government Inquiry Clears Government' Shock!"
"Astonishing Claim! - 'Prime Minister Did Not Lie' Says Man Appointed By Prime Minister"
"Media Accused Of Spreading Stories"
"'Great Day For Us' Say ITN, Murdoch"

Now let's have the *real* inquiry : Why did Blair lie and why is he still lying?

TheJudge


Same old story, Hutton joins Scott and Widgery in whitewash hall of shame

28.01.2004 16:41

Not at all surprised.

If anyone has the time to read the whole thing or was watching it at the time can they tell me this -

Did ANYONE bring up the inconsistencies of 'confirming the name of Kelly if the media guessed' and the policy, done AT THE SAME TIME, of refusing to CONFIRM OR DENY if Freddie Scappatichi was the double agent known as "Stake-knife/steaknife"?

Scappatichi was afforded more protection than Kelly, even though Freddie's name was MUCH more likely to come out and even though, he was involved with a bunch of murders (well, more than one bunch).

I must say it was great timing from David Kay and the Guardian as well.
Hutton isn't enough to save Tony's reputation now that Kay has gone.
And Hutton says that the 45-minute claim was from a good source, while the day before, the Iraqi who gave MI6 the 45-minute claim says it was untrue (Guardian Tuesday Jan 27 2004 pg 1 "Iraqi who gave MI6 the 45-minute claim says it was untrue" .
In fact, his political associate Nick Theros, (son of former US ambassador is quoted saying the information seemed to be a "crock of shit"

The man who gave the second-hand info to MI6, Iyad Allawi, has since been appointed to the Iraqi Governing Council in Baghdad.

Did anyone mention that in Parliament?


TH


above all else..

28.01.2004 16:54

This is being spun as 'Blair proved right on WMD'.

In which case, where are they?

kurious


give it a few days...

28.01.2004 18:08

..and the leaking will have overshadowed the report.

M


From the beginning

28.01.2004 19:50

From the beginning he said 'I decided that deciding the truth of whether or not the intelligence was correct or not fell outside the remit of my report'. So from the word go, it was safe for the government. Instead, it cleared the government of telling the intelligence services to embellish the dossier any more than the original embelishment they produced. The inquiry doesn't address the fundamental issue, that the intelligence obviously WAS wrong. And why was it wrong? Are the secret service simply imcompetent? Its ridiculous, and this whole silly affair has just made me even more cynical of the establishment than I already am, and I'm already pretty damn cynical.

Hermes