Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Pro-Israel propaganda on Indymedia

- | 30.11.2003 13:05

Systematic pro-Israel posts on Indymedia are not news, not analysis, and not discussion.

Indymedia is occasionally used for systematic propaganda campaigns, and the supporters of Israel are good at such campaigns. They post items such as this one,

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2003/11/282186.html

which is agressively pro-Israel, and repeats several standard claims of pro-Israel propaganda. However, it is not a news item, it is simply a cut-and-paste of an article from the Jewish World Review (by Fiamma Nirenstein). It is not an analysis of anything, but simply a set of propaganda claims , mostly in the form of an accusation. You can find it at several aggressive right-wing pro-Israel sites such as Israpundit.

Subsequently someone - probably the original poster - added another cut-and-paste. This one is directed against an Israeli NGO and originates from the right-wing columnist Gerard Steinberg.

Why should Indymedia serve as a platform for this propaganda, especialy since its originators have their own websites? Indymedia is not a mirror site for the Jewish World Review or Israpundit, and the editors should not allow it to be used in that way.

-

Comments

Display the following 3 comments

  1. Clear neo-nazi BNP/NF/C18 anti-Israel posts on indymedia — Kalil bin Shakil Al-Jahni
  2. not as simple as palestinians being an under dog — sgfg
  3. I agree sgfg — Andrew