No Platform
Richard (socialist workers party) | 08.05.2003 15:00
If indymedia is an independent media source to provide discussion, communication of events, and therefore a democratic tool, why are BNP members/supporters allowed to post pro-nazi views and defence of this party. Which is racist, anti-democratic, asylumbashing and homophobic. Why give them a platform, what is the policy ofindymedia?
I couldn't find the policy doc of indymedia....
However, several items have appeared on this website posted by British National Party members/supporters.
I am deeply concerned that an independent media outlet whose audience, i assume, is composed of anti-racists and pro-democracy, anti-war, anti-capitalists etc, allows Nazi supporters to post on this site.
I would hope that we could prevent groups that seek to divide us and undermine our democracy from using this alternate media source to further the aims of the nazi BNP who seek to undermine our democracy.
It should be noted too that the BNP, following Hitler, ultilise the rhetoric of anti-capitalism and opposition to big business.
We should be clear that it was the fascists in Italy who sided with the police during Genoa, as posted on this site at the time, and were therefore complicit in the attack on the indymedia centre in Genoa.
I would hope that indymedia could be a tool to smash the ascendency of the far-right and racism, especially after the recent election results.
Defeating Nazis in argument didn't work in Germany, where Hitler used a combination of the democratic process and intimidation and violence to rise to power and murder 6million jews, left, trade unionists etc
Our society has not yet experienced the scale of economic crisis Germany did, nor has the backing of industrialists given to the Nazis occurred.
We can afford no indulgence in smashing the Nazi menace, this has to begin with No Platform, exposing them, and running them our streets on a mass basis.
However, several items have appeared on this website posted by British National Party members/supporters.
I am deeply concerned that an independent media outlet whose audience, i assume, is composed of anti-racists and pro-democracy, anti-war, anti-capitalists etc, allows Nazi supporters to post on this site.
I would hope that we could prevent groups that seek to divide us and undermine our democracy from using this alternate media source to further the aims of the nazi BNP who seek to undermine our democracy.
It should be noted too that the BNP, following Hitler, ultilise the rhetoric of anti-capitalism and opposition to big business.
We should be clear that it was the fascists in Italy who sided with the police during Genoa, as posted on this site at the time, and were therefore complicit in the attack on the indymedia centre in Genoa.
I would hope that indymedia could be a tool to smash the ascendency of the far-right and racism, especially after the recent election results.
Defeating Nazis in argument didn't work in Germany, where Hitler used a combination of the democratic process and intimidation and violence to rise to power and murder 6million jews, left, trade unionists etc
Our society has not yet experienced the scale of economic crisis Germany did, nor has the backing of industrialists given to the Nazis occurred.
We can afford no indulgence in smashing the Nazi menace, this has to begin with No Platform, exposing them, and running them our streets on a mass basis.
Richard (socialist workers party)
e-mail:
richmcewan@hotmail.com
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
Try here
08.05.2003 15:10
Here is where you can find the editorial guidelines of Indymedia UK. BNP postings will be pulled from the newswrire, as would any fascistic or otherwise offensive piece. However, the editorial team is a group of volunteers who have given up their spare time, and sometimes there is an enormous workload, hence it may take a while for offensive stuff to be removed.
Thomas J
Homepage: http://uk.indymedia.org/censor.php3
Thanks
08.05.2003 15:25
rich
If that was true...
08.05.2003 21:36
Sean Knighton
Bollocks
08.05.2003 22:24
Why is it only the Stalinist SWP and their bastard offspring the ANL who argue for "No Platform"? Is it because they know better than the rest of us? Is it because they wish to help their fellow man?
No - it's because they are a bunch of wasters, most of whom couldn't hold down a job, much less be a 'worker', and whose half-baked Stalinism cannot stand against reasoned arguments, whether from the racists or anyone else.
If you accept 'No Platform' for one group, you'll soon find it extending its tentacles to others. Soon it'll be 'No Platform for Employers'. or 'No Platform for Male Opressors', or any other group who falls out with the SWP authoritarians.
Bollocks to 'No Platform' - if you can't argue against racists, then we may as well give up now.
Bri.
Brian
Ermmm....
08.05.2003 22:37
Non-news: posts which are clearly purely comment, opinion or rants unrelated to a recent event or action, or contradict the imc uk mission statement in an offensive way.
natsocnet
No Platform only option
09.05.2003 16:21
The SWP welcomes our "fellow travellers" but this constant sniping undermines us all.
By the way, i'm not a student and never have been. The vast majority of SWP members in my midlands branch are over 30,in full-time employment and are trades unionists.
David J (SWP)
surely a typo?!
09.05.2003 17:49
should perhaps read:
"The SWP have consistently been jumping on the bandwagon of almost every significant protest action in the UK over the past 30 years..."
amused
propaganda = invented and used by the reds.
10.05.2003 07:24
anti_marx