Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Where are they?

jackslucid | 30.04.2003 18:04

Are we children to be treated this way?

So the dan/joel entity post the same article on these wires and a lot of commentry is produced.

Then someone takes the decision that we can no longer see those posts or those comments.

Are we being treated as children?

Do we need the nannie on our modem?

As I repeatly been told - this is not a free speech forum. I can accept this in extremise, i don't want to wade through the filthy gutters inhabitated by the sun/news of the world. Nor do I wish to see the neanderthal scrapping their intellectual knuckles across the beautiful skin of non-whites/whites/gays/lesbians etcetc.

But its too late.

I saw, read and replied to the missing posts - I KNOW there content. Whoever made the decision to remove them is either currently suffering under a mild delusion - we all go there - and has made a mistake, or [they] fundamentally have no respect for us as individual intellects and have decided for us THEMSELVES.

You play into some dangerous hands with the latter tactic, and have placed yourselves at the mercy of a very dubious and constantly encroaching agenda - sanatise this site too much and it becomes just another loud void.

Restore the threads.

jackslucid
- e-mail: jackslucid@hotmail.com

Comments

Display the following 5 comments

  1. Indymedia is not a discussion board — Thomas J
  2. Memory hole — Unperson
  3. Thomas — Brian
  4. I was talking about actual articles — Thomas J
  5. I'm with Thomas...... — anybody