Skip to content or view screen version

Earth 'will expire by 2050' and Lottocracy (revised)

Ad van der Ven | 13.07.2002 11:31

Recently Mark Townsend and Jason Burke published a paper in The Observer entitled: Earth 'will expire by 2050'. Wouldn't it be wonderful not only to report about the problem, but also about the solution, which is painless, gradual and has only to be made public. It (the solution) is described in the book: The World Solution for World Problems. The book (ISBN 90-9002592-8) is available as hard copy at the Library of Congress, Washington DC, and at the Library of Princeton University, Princeton NJ. However, it is also available as an electronic book ( http://baserv.uci.kun.nl/~adv/leonbook/leonbook.html).

Recently Mark Townsend and Jason Burke published a paper in The Observer entitled: Earth 'will expire by 2050'. Wouldn't it be wonderful not only to report about the problem, but also about the solution, which is painless, gradual and has only to be made public. It (the solution) is described in the book: The World Solution for World Problems. The book (ISBN 90-9002592-8) is available as hard copy at the Library of Congress, Washington DC, and at the Library of Princeton University, Princeton NJ. However, it is also available as an electronic book ( http://baserv.uci.kun.nl/~adv/leonbook/leonbook.html).

Firstly, the book discusses the main world problem of today, which is the gradual, but lethal change of the soil and atmosphere. The problem has also recently been described in a study by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), which has been released last Tuesday. The authors of the WWF report warn that the human race is plundering the planet at a pace that outstrips its capacity to support life. Secondly the book discusses the main cause, which is the worldwide overpopulation, and, finally, it discusses the main solution, which is world government by lottocracy. The latter is necessary to enforce a 'one child per couple per life' policy for ALL people. This, until the load is lifted from nature, which is roughly the case when the world population is about the size of five million instead of five billion (*), as it is now. According to the author lottocracy is the only obvious, and the only fair way of attaining world government.

The idea of lottocracy is shortly described at the end of the chapter: Democracy and Things. According to the author it is a logical, fair, and scientific way to form a world government. All citizens are put into a file of a computer, the computer produces two citizens at random every day, out of the group of say, 45 year olds, and they are the conscripts for a year, starting that very day. In another book of the same author, called Tao Stoics, also available as electronic book ( http://baserv.uci.kun.nl/~adv/taostoa/taostoa.html), the author suggests three persons instead of two (see Tao Stoic 200). The selected ones are conscripts in the service of mankind, and their service of one year, includes three months for instruction in procedures, and in understanding scientists. Scientists are needed for advice. When they govern, they know hardly a thing about the matter in hand but they have a conscience and the advise of scientists, to make proper decisions. Then, their office is right on the campus of a scientific establishment, so they can get all the advice necessary, and fast. Every day two (or three) join up, every day two (or three) are just finished. They need not stay on for the finishing of a job, they can just go. They are located all over the globe, they cannot therefore become a group or party with interests of their own, but are electronically linked up. There is no, absolutely no, secrecy and they are solely interested in the well being of mankind, in man's rights & duties, in human dignity. In this way they are just co-operatives. The concept of lottocracy is described in more detail in the chapter: A Concept for Government (see also  http://baserv.uci.kun.nl/~adv/lottocracy.html).

The principle of lottocracy can be used on the level of cities, of hemispheres, and, of course, for the whole planet. It is a recipe for the solution of the one and only problem that is facing mankind, which is his own extermination by his own hands. It is argued that world problems ask for world solutions and that this is solely a question of re-education. All man-made problems are ideational (and number dependent), not physical, thus, an ideational (educative) solution is required. It is furthermore held forth that the partial solutions one hears of, such as the recycling of raw materials, the use of clean energy, the purification of waste water, etc., are no solutions at all, but, in the long run, make the problem even worse. Additionally, it is contended, that, the integration of all world citizens should be enhanced by the introduction of the world-language, which is English, the mostly spoken second language today.

The whole idea of the book is also summarized in Tao Stoic 17.

"Master, the pollution of the seas, rivers, the air, famine here, rich abundance of food wastage there, the costly waste of men and material in wars, the yokels so rich yet knowing not what to do with there lives, the churches of superstition that kill and kill, the diplomats and presidents that know less about Nature than schoolboys, what human stupidity!"
"Indeed. But what is the remedy?"
"A fair and sane world-government!"
"And for that, what is needed?"
"The World-language, the integration of all world-citizens, instead of uniting them under the straightjacket of resolutions and agreements. Then, there is 'de-population', necessary because of the NUMBER-DEPENDENCY of our problems. One-Pro-Mille is enough for Earth."
"Good. But there is one thing more critical for this, one most fundamental criterion. These world-citizens should be brought up in the Way. Free Thinking, Happy, persons not under laws, but furnished with an inner code of rationality, of being gentle and always preferring the True Word."


(*) The book was written in 1985.

Ad van der Ven
- e-mail: A.vanderVen@nici.kun.nl

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Propaganda

13.07.2002 15:47

Ignore this pro-NWO crap, please.

Global Nation


Finally some common sense

15.07.2002 11:41

What a joy to read this paper. What would it be nice to have a world with only five million inhabitants instead of seven billion now. Each of them could live on an estate of at least one square mile. Not to mention the relief for all animals and plants which are now under the thread of extinction. I admire to courage of the author to discuss the last taboo: the more children we produce the less chance of survival.

Patrick of Ireland


ah the old one square mile formula is back

15.07.2002 14:38

the ideas posted in the document are very dangerous to the freedom of infividuals

lets discuss the old 1 mile per human rule, and why it is complete fuckin shit:

Total Surface Area: 197,000,000 square miles

Area of land: 148,326,000 km2 (57,268,900 square miles), this are 29% of the total surface of the Earth

Area of water: 361,740,000 km2 (139,668,500 square miles), this are 71% of the total surface of the Earth.



Assume 20% of land on earth was put asside for human agricultural use, 3% for Cities, Towns, Villages, 2% for industrial, recycling purposes, and the other 75% for Nature only (Forests, Deserts, Savanah, Mountains etc, Tundra, and Glaciers)


So we get 25% for use by us, 75% for nature to develop without our intervention. 14,317,225 square miles for human development
11,453,780 square miles for agriculture (or 7.33 billion square acres for food production)

7.33 Billion acres will supply enough food can supply enough food for up to 30 billion +-20% depending on crops/livestock grown.

a family of 5 requires 1 hectare [approx. 2.5 acres] of land to feed itself, maintain a garden, and allow for freedom of movement

To give the author a clue of how much food can be grown using non intensive and intensive farming practises I suggest you read:


 http://www.cfbf.com/info/agfacts_full.htm
 http://www.manyfoldfarm.com/comfoosys/chapter3.htm
 http://www.inverizon.com/ncgi/detail1.htm
 http://foodforeveryone.org/foundation/history.shtml
 http://www.foodsresourcebank.org/demo3.html



basically the earth can feed up to 30 billion people, but 9 billion is a more realistic figure to avoid stress to both man and the environment (this is 30 billion with the jewels of nature intact).

The article described is a dangerous new world oerder type article, it will leave no room to blacks, asians, arabs or anyone else who does not fit the exploitation raquet

Perhaps the author would like his relatives to mate, as the population base would be so sparse for any real human development......


Oh did I forget to mention the ocean, yeah I did as this system would not even exploit the ocean!!!

everyone is equal


Patrick of Ireland: FUCK YOU

16.07.2002 02:04

FUCK-You Pat, you fuckin'Nazi skinhead punk motherfucker...I can't believe you just declared genocide on a billion of the worlds people...to say that it "...would be nice to have a world with only five million inhabitants instead of seven billion now..." Ever heard of sharing and making room for your neighbor, motherfucker. This world is large enough for billions more people, but it is monarchist, aristocratic, corporate financial oligarch policies of genocide, depopulation driving the NWO that you seemed to support and approve of. Hear the children of Africa crying because they have nothing to eat because them and there parents are suffering from aids and malnutrition. It seems you have no problem with castle dwelling lunatics when you said "Each of them could live on an estate of at least one square mile" that legislate genocide in Africa, middle east and south america. There is already a population decline "motherfucker" When need to support population growth so more people live and not die. This in turn will provide more educated, more compassionate earth dwellers more concerned for eachother and the natural world. You take away that and your left with policies of genocide that Hitler, Montigue Norman and Prince Philip so greatly support. So take your NWO, NAZI loving propaganda and go fuck yourself, motherfucker. Better yet get started with the NWO and commit suicide, stupid fuck!

Patrick the NAZI


To Patrick the NAZI

02.08.2002 12:57

No one is killed. If you use contraceptives, like a condom, you do not kill anybody. How can you kill somebody who does not exisist? Finally, remember: More room for humans means less room for animals (and plants). The 'one child per woman' rule does not favor any race, religion, or what have you.

Patrick of Ireland


To everyone is equal

05.08.2002 11:24

According to your own calculations we have 57,268,900 square miles area of land available. If we take 25% for human use, we have 14,317,225 square miles. That is room for about 14 million people according to the 'one-sqaure-mile' criterion. According to the 'one-pro-mile' criterion earth can have 7 million people. These figures ( 7 million and 14 million) do not differ very much in comparison to 7 billion. So, man can finally live as a king, as he should and the animal (and plant) kingdom could finally recover. The 'one child per woman' rule does not favor (or disfavor) any race, religion, nation, or what have you. There is no question of 'a dangerous new world order'. In a lottocracy decisions are made unanimously, that is with a majority of all governors eventually minus one. If everyone in the representative organ agrees, one may expect that almost everybody in the population agrees. You really should read the book first, before making any rash conclusuions!

Patrick of Ireland