Socialist Alliance - friend of the criminal
Jack | 07.04.2002 02:07
How the disasterously deluded policies of the Socialist Alliance would increase crime dramatically if ever implemented.
Their manifesto reads: "..End the armed policing policies that led to the shooting of Harry Stanley and others. End the use of CS gas, batons, manacles and other forms of
weaponry on vulnerable people. Disband all special police units."
The police put their lives on the line day in day out to protect ordinary people, but to disarm them of CS gas and batons, is sheer madness. Firstly, this would mean they are no longer able to tackle anyone weilding a weapon without risking their lives considerably. As a result, the number of deaths on the job for policemen would rise dramatically, and the number of criminals dying would also increase as the police would have to use riskier ways of disarming them.
The banning of handcuffs would result in the same: more officer deaths from dangerous suspects, and more suspect deaths from the police having to "manually" restrain someone risking suffocation or other injuries to the suspect.
They want to disband all special police units, hmm, so that means:
No more dog units for sniffing out drugs and weapons, and missing people.
No more riot units for preventing football hooligans, drunken louts, and violent protestors from trashing your town and beating-up/killing someone.
No more armed response units to deal with gun wielding psycopaths, armed robbers, murderers etc.
No more child protection units for dealing with abusive parents who sexually or physically abuse their kids.
No more drug squads for protecting your kids from hard drugs and the vermin who deal them.
No more sub-aqua units for finding bodies and other evidence.
No more fraud squads for dealing with fraudsters out to rip you off, corrupt public officials etc.
No more major crime units for dealing with murders, rapes and other serious offences.
Great, crime would rule supreme under the Socialist Alliance, what utter lunatics they are.
weaponry on vulnerable people. Disband all special police units."
The police put their lives on the line day in day out to protect ordinary people, but to disarm them of CS gas and batons, is sheer madness. Firstly, this would mean they are no longer able to tackle anyone weilding a weapon without risking their lives considerably. As a result, the number of deaths on the job for policemen would rise dramatically, and the number of criminals dying would also increase as the police would have to use riskier ways of disarming them.
The banning of handcuffs would result in the same: more officer deaths from dangerous suspects, and more suspect deaths from the police having to "manually" restrain someone risking suffocation or other injuries to the suspect.
They want to disband all special police units, hmm, so that means:
No more dog units for sniffing out drugs and weapons, and missing people.
No more riot units for preventing football hooligans, drunken louts, and violent protestors from trashing your town and beating-up/killing someone.
No more armed response units to deal with gun wielding psycopaths, armed robbers, murderers etc.
No more child protection units for dealing with abusive parents who sexually or physically abuse their kids.
No more drug squads for protecting your kids from hard drugs and the vermin who deal them.
No more sub-aqua units for finding bodies and other evidence.
No more fraud squads for dealing with fraudsters out to rip you off, corrupt public officials etc.
No more major crime units for dealing with murders, rapes and other serious offences.
Great, crime would rule supreme under the Socialist Alliance, what utter lunatics they are.
Jack
Comments
Hide the following 19 comments
so what
07.04.2002 03:19
stevie d
WTF!!!!!!
07.04.2002 03:20
what is ur game
if u are genuine, then it is quite obvious that u have had no experience of the police first hand (except for being one urself). The police use these non-lethal wepons not to save crying childeren from the clutches of evil doers, but to bully anyone who dares to question their authority (unfortunatley this is probably a sad cycle of violence i.e. bullied becomes bully).
i shall no longer honour this any further
james
Dhampagne Socialist Alliance
07.04.2002 10:34
krug
Radical Chic !
07.04.2002 11:19
It's quite possible. Bristol seems to be having a go at it. wish them all the best . Owen the .....
owen
See for yourselves...
07.04.2002 12:43
They are good alternative electorally to the shite "main" parties and of course the fuckwit nazis of the BNP who are trying to get votes by appearing respectable. If the Socialist Alliance or Scottish Socialist Party is standing in your area then instead of wasting your vote (I had to do this in the general election),put your X in their box. Electoral politics isn't the b all and end all of activity against this system, but for many people it is a start.
Thylacine
Public Health Warning
07.04.2002 13:11
Ask yourselves a question: How many persons have been killed by anti-capitalist protestors in the past couple of years . . . Erm, the answer is - no-one.
And how many people have been killed by Jack's mates in Combat 18? Well, quite a few actually. Not to mention the race riots they started, the firebombings, the hate mail, the letter bombs, the random beatings of innocent passers-by, the attack on anti-racist football supporters' associations ad nauseum ad infinitum.
Jack will deny that he represents the BNP, because he is too ashamed to admit his real agenda. Behind his attacks on the Anti Nazi League, the Socialist Alliance and "immigrants" lies a toxic vat of hatred directed at ethnic minorities, gays and lesbians, and those interested in promoting openness and tolerance. It is a sick irony that these fascist parasites hide behind the rhetoric of "nationalism", since everything they stand for is an affront to decent English people.
Anarchist Rioter
smears
07.04.2002 13:46
My "attack" on the Socialist Alliance consisted of writing-up their own manifesto entry. You could say that was enough of an attack really, seeing as their policies would result in a massive increase in crime. The police are there for a reason, before them we had a massive crime problem, communities can't protect themselves as well because there has to be a system that deals with people in a professional way through the courts. The Socialist Alliance, being a Trotskyite organisation, would of course use all the measures they disagree with to clamp down on any anti Communists if they ever got into power. Organisations like the Socialist Alliance are completely against democracy and free speech, so to think they represent a "refreshing alternative" is sheer lunacy.
Jack
Democracy?
07.04.2002 15:24
If you want a terrorist government which tortures, rapes and murders, vote for Hitler's prodigies, the BNP - a gang of thugs whose leaders have a long list of convictions for violent racist assaults. Yep, the best way to stop violent crime is to elect violent criminals, like John Tyndall.
Hey, Jack, I'm no avid supporter of the Socialist Alliance, but at least I know they'd be on my side of the barricade and you skinheads will be with the police and their goons.
Dan Brett
e-mail:
dan@danielbrett.co.uk
the communists are as bad or worse
07.04.2002 19:05
Jack
NO PLATFORM FOR FASCISTS!
07.04.2002 21:06
rights of workers, young people and all those fighting back against the system. Why should we give freedom
of expression to those who want to take that most fundamental right that has been won ordinary people under
capitalism. These people are complete scum. They seek to deny the existance of the gas chambers and that
holocaust ever took place. They also want to return to the nazi type persecution of ethnic minorities,gays and
the disabled. We should oppose these people everywhere they seek to organise.
NO PASARAN! SMASH THE NATIONAL FRONT,BNP,COMBAT 18!
FOR A SOCIALIST SOCIETY FREE FROM RACISM AND ROOT CAUSES OF FASCIASM!
CG
Jack has a point, but do Socialist Alliance
07.04.2002 22:09
I understand how stopping the use of CS gas, handcuffs, etc, will severely cripply the ability of the police to protect innocent people (which is what it is meant for!).
However, if you read the Socialist Alliance manifesto, at Jack's quote can be found at
Personally, I would have no qualms about voting Socialist Alliance, purely because I feel that New Labour has betrayed me and everyone else who believed in the Labour party.
If you really want to know the facts Jack, I suggest that you e-mail the Socialist Alliance at
moderate
CG - nutter
07.04.2002 22:23
Am I racist? No.
Did I say I disagreed with democracy? No.
Did I say I wanted to take it away? No.
Did I "deny" the Holocaust? No.
Did I say I wanted gays, ethnic minorities and the disabled to be persecuted? No.
Does the BNP want these things? No.
I think you have your wires crossed in your hysterical outburst. The BNP just wants to stand-up for British people and defend their rights.
Jack
Nazi's OFF the indymedia
08.04.2002 16:03
up some provocative statement, then get a 'moderate' to
back them up! Don't be deceived both "Jack" and "Moderate" are Nazi's
Antonius Cliffus
You want to help British people?
08.04.2002 18:14
Do you include non-white british people in this category or do you think this is an oxymoron?
Personally, I do have some sympathy for some of the people who vote BNP in say, Oldham. Most of the time people aren't very 'ideological' and tend to respond to people who show an interest. The BNP have put in a lot of effort going to these areas, talking to white people and giving them one particular understanding of what is going on and why their lives are so hard ie. 'you have no money, there are no jobs, council services are shit and no-one stands up for your interests - this is the fault of the asians who are treated with kid gloves and get preferential treatment from the authorities'.
Whether you like it or not, there is some truth in this story. Labour no longer even pretends to care about these people. Money for regeneration gets spent in the poorest of the poor areas and these are often where asians live. This means that poor whites see asian areas being developed while their estates are left to rot. Official backing for something called 'Multi-culturalism' has allowed asian 'community leaders' a role in representing 'their people' ie delivering the vote to corrupt party machines in return for some community benefits and enhanced status for themselves. This can easily be interpreted as Lording it and is unfair.
I think that the problem comes when people see people vote BNP and come out with something like 'everyone who votes BNP is a thick racist'. Sure, we can all agree that BNP party members may be beyond hope and from time to time require a good kicking, but that isn't going to stop them on its own. (SWP/ANL don't even do this sort of thing - they prefer to hold a rally with the local asian community so the BNP gets loads of free publicity and the white communities is alienated even further)
What we need to do is engage white communities directly with a decent narrative which opposes the racist analysis of the BNP and encourages people to stand up for themselves against the people who hold power or choose to fuck up their communities, rather than fighting the asians who are just more visible. I reckon that this should include ideas about how to deal with shits who mug people, like they have done in Bristol.
Oh yeah, I like the 'Have I said anything racist?' line. The political class, of which Jack appears to aspire to belong, hardly ever says anything overtly racist but their immigration policies are based on an acceptance that racial tension is an inevitable, (ie understandable) reaction to all those strange looking people coming into your neighbourhood - so that's racist isn't it?
Christopher Spence
I AM NOT A NAZI!
08.04.2002 18:14
moderate
BNP voters
08.04.2002 18:18
Do you include non-white british people in this category or do you think this is an oxymoron?
Personally, I do have some sympathy for some of the people who vote BNP in say, Oldham. Most of the time people aren't very 'ideological' and tend to respond to people who show an interest. The BNP have put in a lot of effort going to these areas, talking to white people and giving them one particular understanding of what is going on and why their lives are so hard ie. 'you have no money, there are no jobs, council services are shit and no-one stands up for your interests - this is the fault of the asians who are treated with kid gloves and get preferential treatment from the authorities'.
Whether you like it or not, there is some truth in this story. Labour no longer even pretends to care about these people. Money for regeneration gets spent in the poorest of the poor areas and these are often where asians live. This means that poor whites see asian areas being developed while their estates are left to rot. Official backing for something called 'Multi-culturalism' has allowed asian 'community leaders' a role in representing 'their people' ie delivering the vote to corrupt party machines in return for some community benefits and enhanced status for themselves. This can easily be interpreted as Lording it and is unfair.
I think that the problem comes when people see people vote BNP and come out with something like 'everyone who votes BNP is a thick racist'. Sure, we can all agree that BNP party members may be beyond hope and from time to time require a good kicking, but that isn't going to stop them on its own. (SWP/ANL don't even do this sort of thing - they prefer to hold a rally with the local asian community so the BNP gets loads of free publicity and the white communities is alienated even further)
What we need to do is engage white communities directly with a decent narrative which opposes the racist analysis of the BNP and encourages people to stand up for themselves against the people who hold power or choose to fuck up their communities, rather than fighting the asians who are just more visible. I reckon that this should include ideas about how to deal with shits who mug people, like they have done in Bristol.
Oh yeah, I like the 'Have I said anything racist?' line. The political class, of which you aspire to belong, hardly ever says anything overtly racist but their immigration policies are based on an acceptance that racial tension is an inevitable, (ie understandable) reaction to all those strange looking people coming into your neighbourhood - so that's racist isn't it?
Christopher Spence
By the way Jack...
08.04.2002 18:34
moderate (and leftist pacifist)
Well, I wonder...
09.04.2002 11:52
Spike Militant
right wing PIGS alliance=FRIENDS OF CRIMINALS
09.04.2002 20:30
clodaghvandervan