Socialist Alliance - friend of the criminal
Jack | 07.04.2002 02:07
How the disasterously deluded policies of the Socialist Alliance would increase crime dramatically if ever implemented.
Their manifesto reads: "..End the armed policing policies that led to the shooting of Harry Stanley and others. End the use of CS gas, batons, manacles and other forms of
weaponry on vulnerable people. Disband all special police units."
The police put their lives on the line day in day out to protect ordinary people, but to disarm them of CS gas and batons, is sheer madness. Firstly, this would mean they are no longer able to tackle anyone weilding a weapon without risking their lives considerably. As a result, the number of deaths on the job for policemen would rise dramatically, and the number of criminals dying would also increase as the police would have to use riskier ways of disarming them.
The banning of handcuffs would result in the same: more officer deaths from dangerous suspects, and more suspect deaths from the police having to "manually" restrain someone risking suffocation or other injuries to the suspect.
They want to disband all special police units, hmm, so that means:
No more dog units for sniffing out drugs and weapons, and missing people.
No more riot units for preventing football hooligans, drunken louts, and violent protestors from trashing your town and beating-up/killing someone.
No more armed response units to deal with gun wielding psycopaths, armed robbers, murderers etc.
No more child protection units for dealing with abusive parents who sexually or physically abuse their kids.
No more drug squads for protecting your kids from hard drugs and the vermin who deal them.
No more sub-aqua units for finding bodies and other evidence.
No more fraud squads for dealing with fraudsters out to rip you off, corrupt public officials etc.
No more major crime units for dealing with murders, rapes and other serious offences.
Great, crime would rule supreme under the Socialist Alliance, what utter lunatics they are.
weaponry on vulnerable people. Disband all special police units."
The police put their lives on the line day in day out to protect ordinary people, but to disarm them of CS gas and batons, is sheer madness. Firstly, this would mean they are no longer able to tackle anyone weilding a weapon without risking their lives considerably. As a result, the number of deaths on the job for policemen would rise dramatically, and the number of criminals dying would also increase as the police would have to use riskier ways of disarming them.
The banning of handcuffs would result in the same: more officer deaths from dangerous suspects, and more suspect deaths from the police having to "manually" restrain someone risking suffocation or other injuries to the suspect.
They want to disband all special police units, hmm, so that means:
No more dog units for sniffing out drugs and weapons, and missing people.
No more riot units for preventing football hooligans, drunken louts, and violent protestors from trashing your town and beating-up/killing someone.
No more armed response units to deal with gun wielding psycopaths, armed robbers, murderers etc.
No more child protection units for dealing with abusive parents who sexually or physically abuse their kids.
No more drug squads for protecting your kids from hard drugs and the vermin who deal them.
No more sub-aqua units for finding bodies and other evidence.
No more fraud squads for dealing with fraudsters out to rip you off, corrupt public officials etc.
No more major crime units for dealing with murders, rapes and other serious offences.
Great, crime would rule supreme under the Socialist Alliance, what utter lunatics they are.
Jack
Comments
Display the following 19 comments