Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

manchester Indymedia

Is Greenpeace sabotaging the ‘Great Climate Swoop’?

Ant. | 22.09.2009 11:40 | COP15 Climate Summit 2009 | Climate Chaos

Greenpeace is encouragung its supporters to engage in other campaigns on the weekend of the 'Great Climate Swoop' rather than backing the protest at Ratcliffe.

The ‘Great Climate Swoop’ against Ratcliffe power station on October 17th - 18th is arguably one of the most important protests this year. If it succeeds in closing down the site, it could lead to a massive upsurge in climate change campaigning. Unfortunately there is evidence that Greenpeace is not only indifferent to the protest but is subtly encouraging its supporters not to attend.

In recent weeks, there has been a lot of internal criticism from some of GP’s area networkers over its refusal to organise campaigns that utilise its pool of trained active supporters. It has been over a year since they have been used in a proper campaign and many local supporter groups are falling apart. In my group, instead of the 25-30 supporters that regularly attended meetings, we are now down to less than six.

One of the reasons that full-timers have been giving is that Greenpeace is suffering its own financial crisis and needs to concentrate its resources on its central activities. While I am sure that this is true, why has Greenpeace announced to its supporters in the past few days TWO separate campaigns (Heathrow and coal) that will make use of its active supporters? And why does it want them to carry out street campaigning in support of these initiatives on SAME the weekend of the ‘Great Climate Swoop’?

It may be the case that Greenpeace has made a mistake; or it may believe that encouraging its supporters to do something else is does not stop from going to Ratcliffe. But it is difficult to see these two requests as being nothing more than a subtle attempt to undermine support for the ‘Great Climate Swoop’. After all, if the Ratcliffe protest does work, then it is going to leave a lot of people, and especially those who loyalty give Greenpeace money each money, asking whether they have got their spending priorities right.

Of course us cynics in Greenpeace could be mistaken and the simple way to prove it would for Canonbury Villas to announce that a ‘Greenpeace bloc’ will be there on October 17th.

Ant.

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Additions

cocktails, anyone?

23.09.2009 11:03

Hi all,

I volunteer at GP and after some chats with people in the organisation about this article, the impression I have got is that there aren't any massed actions planned by the GP UK office over those two weekends. There is / might be a regional or local thing going on at a festival, but as far as I can tell there hasn't been a UK wide call for everyone to clear their diaries.

I agree with the comment about there not having been anough actions for the grass roots activists over the last year. I would not, however, follow this by insinuating that Greenpeace is now organisaing an action, but only to undermine the climate swoop.

A comment from a colleague was that not everyone would be interested in taking part in an action such as the climate swoop.

In this case, a more general / fluffy activity at a festival would only further the aims of the environmental cause, not lessen it.

I would also think that those more inclined to more radical action would go on the climate swoop, rather than doing a fluffier action with GP.

I'll certainly be attending the swoop.

Also, on the 'not being enough actions' comment, despite me agreeing, this shouldn't simply lead to someone criticising GP, but should, and I think, has, lead to people organising their own actions. A plethora of new environmental activist groups have sprung up over the last few years and are doing great things.

GP does have the advantage of having large resources that can achieve different types of actions and gain greater media attention than less well resourced groups, and thus, I beleive, have a responsibility to it's supporters to use those resources to carry out actions.

Er... I'm going to stop now as I'm going round in circles I think, and I'm a bit excited that I used the word 'plethora', which I don't think I've ever done before.


P.S. O.k. in general defence of greenpeace, we do get a fair amount of flack from various people and organisations, usually people who want to mess up the planet for money. When the criticism comes from more radical quarters, I feel compelled to contribute to the discussion as I think GP is one of the, possibly the most radical large organisations on the planet. It does a vast amount of good, and I believe overall it's intentions are overwhemingly in the right place. Those who are more radical in their defence of the planet (and people) I think should focus on criticising and combatting our mutual enemies. In fact this is why I'm with GP. I would say I'm more radical than the general membership of the organisation, but I agree with almost everything they do, hence work with them.
I would think that the original commentator will be a memeber of climate swoop and a local GP group, and feels agrieved that their local GP group is organising something else, BUT I really don't believe for one minute that GP would organise an action to undermine climate swoop. Unless of course the local group is peopled by under cover coppers, but then you're pretty much f#cked anyway. :-0

Love y'all,

Toby

toby


Comments

Display the following 7 comments

  1. Some validity — Josh
  2. Please explain? — Anon.
  3. Don't worry about what Greenpeace is doing or not doing — anon
  4. Ho ho — anon
  5. The orginal post is pointlessly destructive and ill informed — John
  6. Shum mishtake shurely — Ed
  7. correction/addition to earlier article! — Toby

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Manchester Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Manchester Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Manchester Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Manchester Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Manchester Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Manchester Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Manchester Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Manchester Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Manchester Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech